CASA EX114/13 - Exemption – from standard landing minima – Boeing 737 fail-passive aircraft – Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L01882 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

Exemption  from standard landing minima – Boeing 737 fail-passive aircraft – Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and the safety of air navigation.

 

Under subregulation 257 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may determine the meteorological minima, that is the visibility requirements, for landing or takeoff at an aerodrome. Under subregulation 257 (2), the determination must be published in AIP or NOTAMS. Under subregulations 257 (3) and (4), it is an offence for an aircraft to take-off or land if an element of the meteorological minima for that operation is less than that determined for the aircraft at the aerodrome.

 

The determination of standard meteorological minima for take-off and landing was made in instrument CASA 70/11. The minima are also set out in AIP En Route 1.5. If conditions are met, the minimum visibility for landing inside or outside Australian territory is 800 metres, or 550 metres runway visual range. An exemption would be required to operate with lower minimum visibility (low visibility operations or LVO).

 

Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988, in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.

 

Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.

 

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

 

Instrument

The exemption exempts B737 (NG) aircraft with a failpassive automatic landing system operated by Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator), from the standard meteorological minima for landing. This exemption states the lower minima for the aeroplanes, in respect of Category II low visibility landings, as well as the conditions for their use. For instance, the use of the lower minima will require the maximum cross-wind component to be below a specified velocity (see clause 10 in Schedule 2).

 

In essence, the operator must ensure that specified visibility standards are met for landings that may be performed only at aerodromes properly equipped to support the low visibility operations conducted under the exemption. Flight crew training, experience and competency must meet specified benchmarks. Conditions are also prescribed for the maintenance of aircraft equipment and the operation of aircraft. Appropriate foreign approvals for operations must be obtained. A range of documents for inspection must be carried on board the aircraft.

 

The instrument revokes and replaces an earlier exemption (CASA EX86/13). The effect of this instrument is to modify recency requirements so that a captain can meet recency requirements by being an active participant in the operator’s cyclic training and proficiency program for flight crew prescribed in the operator’s operations manual.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the Regulations. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of aircraft. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

Consultation

The operator applied for the earlier exemption (CASA EX86/13) and has applied for this instrument to vary the previous exemption. This instrument is required by the operator to enable it to conduct low visibility landings inside and outside Australian territory consistent with the standards and requirements specified in the instrument which are not considered prejudicial to the interests of safety. CASA considers that no further consultation is appropriate or necessary as the instrument applies only to this aircraft operator.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the exemption is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for exemptions (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration. It expires at the end of 30 September 2016, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

[Instrument number CASA EX114/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Exemption  from standard landing minima  Boeing 737 fail-passive aircraft –
Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument permits Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator) to use minima lower than the standard landing meteorological visibility minima determined by CASA. The exemption is subject to conditions directed by CASA in the interest of safety.

 

The legislative instrument revokes and replaces an earlier exemption (CASA EX86/13) to modify the recency requirements for a captain of an aircraft operated by the operator.

 

The primary purpose of the legislative instrument is to allow aircraft operated by the operator to land using reduced visibility minima specified in the exemption. Use of the minima is subject to compliance with the stated conditions.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, address the need for flexibility in aviation safety regulations to accommodate technological advancements and operational efficiencies while maintaining high safety standards. Section 98 of the Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations concerning air navigation safety, enabling the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to determine meteorological minima for landing or take-off at aerodromes. This includes setting specific visibility requirements and prescribing conditions for low visibility operations. The authority to grant exemptions from these regulations, including the setting of lower meteorological minima, is exercised under subregulation 11.160 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, provided it does not compromise air navigation safety. The policy objective of these regulations is to facilitate safe aviation operations by allowing specific exemptions for certain aircraft and operators, as demonstrated by the exemption for Boeing 737 fail-passive aircraft operated by Virgin Australia Airlines, which permits reduced landing visibility minima subject to stringent safety conditions.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide that the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may grant exemptions from compliance with certain regulations, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998), to ensure safety in air navigation. Specifically, subregulation 11.160(1) of CASR 1998 empowers CASA to grant exemptions from provisions of the regulations in relation to a matter mentioned in subsection 98(5A) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act). This exemption instrument, CASA EX114/13, applies to Boeing 737 fail-passive aircraft operated by Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd, allowing them to operate under lower meteorological minima for landings than those set out in the CAR 1998. The exemption is subject to conditions designed to ensure safety, such as the need for flight crew training, aircraft equipment maintenance, and compliance with specified operational conditions. The exemption also modifies recency requirements for the captain's flight crew training. This legislative instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is provided, confirming that the exemption is compatible with human rights.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to grant exemptions from certain regulatory provisions, including the Civil Aviation Regulations 1998 (CAR 1998), for safety reasons. Section 98 of the Act empowers CASA to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, and under subregulation 11.160(1), CASA can grant exemptions from a provision of the regulations if it is necessary in the interest of safety. This authority is exercised through subregulations 11.160(2) and 11.205(1) of CASR 1998, which allow for the granting of exemptions to a person or a class of persons, and for imposing conditions on these exemptions to ensure safety. The obligations imposed by this legislation on the parties governed by it include adhering to the specified conditions of the exemption. For Virgin Australia Airlines Pty Ltd, this means ensuring that specified visibility standards are met, that flight crew training, experience, and competency meet certain benchmarks, that aircraft equipment is maintained appropriately, and that certain documents are carried on board the aircraft. The exemption also requires that the aircraft be operated only at aerodromes equipped to support low visibility operations and that appropriate foreign approvals are obtained. CASA must publish the exemption on the Internet under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, and the exemption will cease three years after its commencement unless a specific date is stated within it. The Act and the CASR 1998 establish various offences and penalties for non-compliance with regulatory provisions, including the standards for landing and take-off. Under subregulations 257(3) and (4) of CAR 1998, it is an offence for an aircraft to take off or land if the meteorological conditions are below the determined minima for that operation at the aerodrome, with potential penalties that may include fines or other sanctions as determined by the courts. While the specific penalties for breaching the conditions of the exemption are not detailed in the provided text, non-compliance with CASA's regulations generally carries significant civil and potentially criminal consequences, including fines and imprisonment, depending on the severity of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.