Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption — recency requirements for night flying (Tiger Airways Australia Pty Limited)
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.
Subregulation 5.109 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that a commercial (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of a commercial (aeroplane) pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.
Subregulation 5.170 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that an air transport (aeroplane) pilot (the holder of an air transport (aeroplane) pilot licence) must not fly an aeroplane carrying another person unless the pilot satisfies requirements set out in the subregulation.
Paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of CAR 1988 both mention certain requirements (recency requirements) that the pilot must have satisfied in the immediately preceding period of 90 days, being requirements relating to take-offs and landings at night. These requirements are that the pilot has, within the period, carried out at least 3 take-offs and 3 landings at night while flying the aeroplane as pilot in command, or as pilot acting in command under supervision, or in dual flying; alternatively, in that period the pilot must have satisfactorily completed an aeroplane proficiency check that was completed at night or passed a flight test that was conducted at night for the issue, or renewal, of an aeroplane pilot rating or (for paragraph 5.109 (1) (b) only) for the issue of an aeroplane pilot licence.
Subregulation 11.160 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provides that, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may grant an exemption from a provision of the regulations, including CAR 1988 or a provision of the Civil Aviation Orders (the CAOs), in relation to a matter mentioned in that subsection. Under subregulation 11.160 (2), an exemption may be granted to a person, or to a class of persons, and may specify the class by reference to membership of a specified body or any other characteristic.
Under subregulation 11.205 (1) of CASR 1998, CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.225 of CASR 1998, an exemption must be published on the Internet. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 3 years after its commencement) or, if no day is specified, 3 years after commencement.
The exemption allows Tiger Airways Australia Pty Limited (the operator) to use an approved flight simulator to satisfy recency requirements instead of relying on flights in an aeroplane. It differs from paragraphs 5.109 (1) (b) and 5.170 (1) (b) of CAR 1988 in that it allows the recency requirement to be satisfied by 3 take-offs and 3 landings in the immediately preceding 90 days that have been carried out in an approved flight simulator or an aircraft of the same type. In addition, if it appears that the required number of take-offs and landings will not be possible, that period of 90 days can be extended up to a maximum of 120 days by the pilot having carried out a take-off and landing at night, during the last 30 days, while line flying under the supervision of a pilot who holds a delegation to issue or renew a rating or conduct a flight test. If neither of the previous requirements have been satisfied, then the pilot would need to have successfully undertaken, in the immediately preceding 180 days, an approved test for requalification.
The conditions in the instrument are largely consistent with the requirements of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the European Joint Aviation Regulations.
The exemption would allow the operator to rely on normal line flying and on its training and proficiency program, instead of requiring the pilot to undergo special flight tests as may be required by CASA. The operator’s training and proficiency program contains specific night flying sequences in an approved simulator that are not ordinarily available in the aircraft. This benefits the safe conduct of night operations.
Legislative Instruments Act
For subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of the regulations or the CAOs. An instrument issued under paragraph 98 (5A) (a) of the Act is a legislative instrument if the instrument is expressed to apply to a class of persons or aircraft. The exemption applies to a class of persons. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003.
Compatibility with human rights and freedoms
This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 as it does not raise any human rights issues. It does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Consultation
Consultation within the aviation industry as a whole has not taken place. The instrument is in a form consistent with ICAO and European standards. It also renews an exemption (CASA EX58/10) granted to the operator. Any operator whose procedures include a similar training and proficiency program for night flying operations would be granted an equivalent exemption.
Commencement and making
The exemption commences on 1 August 2012. It stops having effect at the end of 31 July 2015.
The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA EX113/12]