CASA EX03/06 - Exemption – training and checking organisation, flight check system

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2006L00351 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 regulation 308

Exemption — training and checking organisation, flight check system

 

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

Subregulation 308 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that CASA may exempt aircraft, or persons in, on, or otherwise associated with the operation of, the aircraft, from compliance with specified provisions of CAR 1988.

Subregulation 308 (2) provides that before making an exemption, CASA must take into account any relevant considerations relating to the interests of safety.

Subregulation 308 (3) of CAR 1988 provides that CASA may make an exemption subject to conditions specified in the exemption as being necessary in the interests of safety.

CAR 217 (1)

Subregulation 217 (1) of CAR 1988 requires that the operator of an aircraft with a maximum take-off weight of more than 5 700 kg must provide a training and checking organisation. However, CASA instruments EX24/2002 and EX38/2004 exempt virtually all single engine aircraft engaged in aerial work operations (for example, fire fighting) from regulation 217.

The MIL-8 multi-engine helicopter is a large, firefighting, multi-engine aircraft with a maximum take-off weight in excess of 5 700 kg. Its size brings it within the scope of regulation 217 and its multi-engines place it outside the scope of CASA EX24/2002 and EX38/2004.

No CASA Flying Operations Inspectors (FOIs) are endorsed on type. The nature of the short-term contract work of these firefighting helicopters makes it impractical to endorse CASA FOIs on type to permit a CAR 217 organisation to be established by the AOC holder.

The instrument, therefore, exempts the operator from the requirement to have a training and checking organisation. Conditions on the exemption require that the operator must hold a discrete AOC for the aircraft which may only be operated for firefighting purposes. Only pilots who meet the Civil Aviation Administration of the Republic of Moldova’s regulations and operator’s check and training proficiency requirements may fly the aircraft. The operator’s Chief Pilot must sight, verify and keep copies of the crew’s licences and proficiency check documents.

CAR 232

Subregulation 232 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that the operator of an aircraft must establish a flight check system for each type of aircraft, setting out the procedures to be followed by the pilot in command and other crew members, prior to and on takeoff, on landing and in emergency situations.

Subregulation 232 (2) of CAR 1988 provides that a flight check system is subject to prior approval of CASA and CASA may, at any time, require the system to be revised in a manner specified by CASA.


2

 

Subregulation 232 (5) of CAR 1988 provides that an aircraft must not be flown unless the flight check system has been approved by CASA and, if CASA has required the system to be revised, the system has been revised in a manner specified by CASA.

CASA considers that the requirement for the flight check system for this aircraft to be approved involves a significant resource impost on both CASA and the operator with no significant enhancement in safety.

The exemption, therefore, exempts the operator of this aircraft from the requirement to have the flight check system separately approved.

As a condition on the exemption, the operator will be required to have a flight check system that complies with the Civil Aviation Administration of the Republic of Moldova’s requirements.

Legislative Instruments Act

Subregulation 308 (4) of CAR 1988 declares an exemption to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is required by the operator to facilitate fire-fighting operations. It would be issued to any operator who requested it and could meet its safety conditions.

The instrument commences on the day after it is registered. It stops having effect at the end of 30 April 2006.

The exemption has been made by the Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer, a delegate of CASA, in accordance with subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.

 

[Instrument number CASA EX 03/06]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were amended in 2006 to introduce an exemption for certain firefighting aircraft, specifically the MIL-8 multi-engine helicopter, from certain regulatory requirements. This amendment was introduced to address the impracticality of adhering to strict regulatory requirements for these aircraft, given their unique operational context and the transient nature of their employment contracts. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to make such exemptions under Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the primary objective of ensuring safety while accommodating the practicalities of firefighting operations. The exemption exempts operators of these large, multi-engine firefighting helicopters from having to establish a training and checking organisation and from the need to separately approve a flight check system. Instead, it imposes conditions that ensure the aircraft are operated by suitably qualified pilots and that appropriate records are maintained. This legislative instrument is subject to parliamentary scrutiny under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, particularly regulation 308, provide the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) with the authority to exempt certain aircraft and their associated personnel from specific regulatory requirements, provided such exemptions do not compromise safety. This regulation empowers CASA to tailor regulatory frameworks to unique operational contexts, ensuring flexibility while maintaining a robust safety standard. The exemption pertains to large, multi-engine firefighting helicopters with a maximum take-off weight exceeding 5,700 kg, which would typically be subject to the requirements of having a training and checking organisation and a flight check system as per CAR 217 and CAR 232, respectively. However, given the impracticality of endorsing CASA inspectors on the type and the specific operational nature of these aircraft, the exemption relieves operators from these requirements. The exemption is subject to stringent conditions, including the necessity for operators to hold a discrete Air Operator Certificate (AOC) for firefighting purposes only and for the operator’s Chief Pilot to verify crew qualifications and training documents. Additionally, the exemption mandates compliance with the Civil Aviation Administration of the Republic of Moldova's requirements for flight check systems, ensuring a consistent safety framework is upheld. The exemption, as a disallowable instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, must be tabled and can be disallowed by Parliament, though it is effective from the day after registration until 30 April 2006. This regulation applies nationally, covering any operator who requests the exemption and meets the specified safety conditions.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of this regulation are 308(1), 308(2), 308(3), and 217(1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988). Section 308(1) allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to exempt aircraft or related parties from certain provisions of the CAR 1988. However, subregulation 308(2) requires CASA to consider safety-related factors before granting an exemption, and subregulation 308(3) allows CASA to impose conditions on such exemptions to ensure safety. Regulation 217(1) mandates that operators of aircraft weighing more than 5,700 kg must provide a training and checking organisation, though specific exemptions apply. This regulation exempts operators of certain large, multi-engine firefighting helicopters from the need to establish a training and checking organisation and from the requirement to have a flight check system separately approved by CASA. The obligations imposed by this regulation on the parties it governs include the necessity for operators of large multi-engine firefighting helicopters to hold a discrete Air Operator Certificate (AOC) for these aircraft, which can only be used for firefighting purposes. Pilots must comply with the Civil Aviation Administration of the Republic of Moldova’s regulations and the operator’s check and training proficiency requirements. The operator's Chief Pilot is responsible for verifying and maintaining records of the crew's licences and proficiency check documents. Additionally, the operator must ensure that their flight check system complies with the Civil Aviation Administration of the Republic of Moldova’s requirements. This system should detail the procedures for the pilot in command and other crew members before and during take-off, landing, and emergency situations. Any breach of this regulation may lead to civil or criminal consequences, although specific penalties are not outlined in the regulation itself. Given the regulatory context, potential penalties for non-compliance could include fines, suspension or revocation of the operator's AOC, and legal action under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The exemptions and conditions are subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, meaning they can be reviewed and potentially disallowed by Parliament if found to be inconsistent with law or policy. The exemption ceases to have effect at the end of 30 April 2006, unless otherwise extended or renewed.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Exemptions & Exclusions
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.