Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
Exemption — for grant of procedure design certificate
Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Terminal instrument flight procedure design
Under subregulation 173.035 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), it is an offence for a person to carry out design work on a terminal instrument flight procedure (a TIFP) for use by an Australian aircraft operating under the I.F.R. unless the person is a certified designer authorised by a procedure design certificate to design such a TIFP.
Under subregulation 173.045 (1) of CASR 1998, a person must apply to CASA for the grant of a procedure design certificate. Under regulation 173.050, the applicant must be able to show that if a procedure design certificate were granted, he or she would be able to comply with the requirements that certified designers must comply with (the criteria). Under regulation 173.350, decisions on applications must be made within 6 months of receipt unless the time is extended by CASA’s requests for further information.
Under subregulation 173.335 (1), CASA must grant the certificate if the applicant meets the criteria, otherwise complies with the requirements of the regulations and the granting of the certificate would not be likely to have an adverse effect on the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 173.340, in deciding whether any such adverse effect would be likely, CASA may take various matters into account (for example, the applicant’s record, experience and knowledge). Under subregulation 173.345, CASA may grant a procedure design certificate subject to conditions necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Under subregulation 173.065 (1), a procedure design certificate comes into force on the date stated in it and remains in force unless it is cancelled.
Under subregulation 173.085 (1), a certified designer must ensure that a TIFP designed under his or her procedure design certificate is designed in accordance with the standards in the relevant CASA Manual of Standards and also in accordance with the standards promulgated by ICAO in ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS).
Under regulation 173.090, a certified designer must have verification procedures involving 2 qualified designers independently checking the design of each TIFP designed under the certificate. For this purpose, a qualified designer means the holder, or the employee of the holder, of a procedure design certificate who has successfully completed an approved course of training in the methods and practices contained in ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS).
Under subregulation 173.100 (1), a certified designer must ensure that each TIFP is given to the AIS for publication in the AIP together with a certificate by the chief designer certifying that the TIFP is designed and validated in accordance with the applicable standards set out in ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS).
2
Exemptions from CASA 1998
Under subregulation 11.160 (1), CASA may grant an exemption from compliance with a provision of CASR 1998. Under regulation 11.165, a person may apply for an exemption.
Under subregulation 11.170 (3), in deciding whether to grant an exemption, CASA must regard as paramount the preservation of an acceptable level of safety. Under subregulation 11.205 (1), CASA may impose conditions on an exemption if this is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 11.210, it is an offence to fail to comply with a condition of an exemption.
Under regulation 11.225, an exemption must be published on the World Wide Web. Under subregulation 11.230 (1), an exemption ceases on the day specified within it (but no longer than 2 years after its commencement), or if no day is specified, 2 years after commencement.
Naverus Inc.
Naverus Inc., based in Seattle in the USA (Naverus), is an international consulting corporation which designs terminal instrument flight procedures. Naverus has developed design criteria, not available in the public domain, which differ from the criteria set out in ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS). The Naverus design rules accommodate the use of advanced navigation capabilities available on modern transport aircraft such as the Boeing 737, and provide substantially increased safety over procedures designed using conventional criteria of the kind found in ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS). For reference purposes, the special Naverus TIFP is known as Area Navigation (Required Navigation Performance — Authorisation Required) (an RNAV (RNP-AR)).
Safety evaluation
The FAA has issued a number of documents that enable the design of a TIFP based largely on the same design concepts as the Naverus design criteria. The FAA criteria are designated Special Aircrew, Aircraft and Authorization Required procedures. This has led to the recently issued FAA Order 8260.52 which makes advanced RNAV (RNP-AR) approach design criteria available in the public domain in the US. ICAO, through its Obstacle Clearance Panel, is developing similar design criteria which will be harmonised with the FAA Order 8260.52. The FAA/ICAO criteria do not include departure criteria, although development of this is planned for 2006.
While both the FAA and the proposed ICAO approach criteria are similar in concept to the Naverus design criteria, Naverus also incorporates several features which permit additional safety and operational benefits.
CASA conducted an independent evaluation of the Naverus design criteria by considering CAA NZ RNAV (RNP) operations at Queenstown NZ, and by consulting with Transport Canada, the FAA and CAA NZ about the safety aspects of procedures designed using Naverus design criteria. CASA has concluded that the trial use of the Naverus design criteria instead of ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS) for a TIFP in Australia would preserve a level of aviation safety that was at least comparable to that which would be provided by use of ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS). CASA also concluded that the level of safety was at least acceptable to it.
3
Qantas trial of RNAV (RNP-AR) in Australia
Qantas Airways Ltd (Qantas) wishes to conduct a trial of Naverus-designed RNAV (RNP-AR) approach and departure procedures at suitable airports in Australia, as
previously conducted at Queenstown, NZ. However, Qantas may not yet do so because Naverus is not a certified designer and may not design a TIFP in Australia, or for Australian aircraft. Naverus has, therefore, applied to CASA for a procedure design certificate under Part 173 of CASR 1998 for the purpose of designing RNAV (RNP‑AR) TIFP for the Qantas trial.
However, since Naverus designs a TIFP to the Naverus design criteria and not ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS), it is not be possible for Naverus to be issued with a procedure design certificate unless it is exempt, both as an applicant for a certificate and as a certified designer, from certain requirements in Part 173 of CASR 1998.
Exemption — for the application
The instrument therefore exempts Naverus, as an applicant for a procedure design certificate, from compliance with regulation 173.050 of CASR 1998 for the requirements that the application must meet. These are essentially that the applicant must demonstrate the capacity to meet the requirements of Division 173.B.2 of CASR 1998. However, as Naverus will be exempted from some of these, exemption from this threshold requirement for the application is also required.
Exemption — from requirements to be complied with for designing
The instrument also exempts Naverus from compliance with those aspects of the regulations and the related Manual of Standards (MOS) that refer to ICAO Doc. 8186 (PANS-OPS).
The TIFP in which Naverus specialises is designated as RNAV (RNP-AR), a procedure that is not included in the TIFP listed in the MOS. The instrument, therefore, also exempts Naverus from compliance with those aspects of the MOS that refer to the other TIFPs that are not relevant for Naverus purposes.
There is also an exemption from the requirements of regulation 173.100 of CASR 1998 to publish a TIFP in the AIP. Normally TIFPs are published in the AIP to be made available to other operators. However, as RNAV (RNP-AR) TIFPs are authorisation‑required they may not be used by other operators until CASA is satisfied that they are safe. This is the rationale behind the Qantas trial mentioned above and also the reason why publication in the AIP is not required.
Conditions
The exemptions made by the instrument are subject to various conditions. For example, Naverus must comply with the relevant provisions of Part 173 of CASR 1998 and the MOS from which it is not exempt.
Naverus may design only in accordance with both the procedure design certificate issued to it by CASA, its CASA-approved design criteria and the Naverus operations manual over which CASA has directive control. This means also that Naverus may only design RNAV (RNP-AR) TIFPs and no other forms of TIFP.
4
Designs must be certified by the chief designer and provided to CASA at least 28 days before they are used. They must be clearly marked “For CASA approved operators only”. The chief designer, all supervisory staff, design staff and design verification staff must be trained in CASA-approved training. The Naverus operations manual must contain the approved design criteria, this instrument and any other CASA directions.
The Naverus safety management system must cover compliance with the safety standards in the design criteria. Responsibility for maintaining an RNAV (RNP-AR) may not be transferred without CASA’s written approval. Naverus must permit inspectors to exercise their powers under the regulations.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Regulation 11.215 of CASR 1998 declares an exemption of this kind to be a disallowable instrument. The exemption is, therefore, a legislative instrument and it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.
Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case. The instrument is to enable Naverus to design a TIFP in circumstances that CASA considers are safe.
The instrument comes into effect on 18 January 2006 after having been registered. It stops having effect at the end of 31 December 2007.
The exemption has been made by the Deputy Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer, a delegate of CASA, in accordance with subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.
[Instrument number CASA EX01/06]