CASA ADCX 025/12 - Revocation of Airworthiness Directives

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L00005 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

 

CASA ADCX 025/12 - Revocation of Airworthiness Directives

 

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Under the previous subregulation 39.001(5) of CASR 1998, an AD was a legislative instrument.  This is still the situation under subsection 98(5B) of the Act.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD.  State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs per Civil Aviation Safety Regulations Part 39.001A.

AD/PR/40 Amdt 1

 

A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A.  The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2009-0114R1 Correction issued on 13 December 2012.

 

Consultation

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation, because the cancellation results in a reduction of the regulatory burden.

 

The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Human Rights Implications

The instrument sets out technical requirements as detailed above.  The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms.

 

This AD cancellation has been made by the Manager, Continuing Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 025/12]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, ensuring safety and efficiency in the industry. This Act was introduced to address the need for a robust legislative basis that supports the regulation of air navigation and aircraft operations within Australia. The Act empowers the Governor-General to make regulations, such as airworthiness directives, under section 98, with a primary focus on maintaining the safety of air navigation. The Civil Aviation (Safety) Regulations 1998 further elaborate on the mechanisms for issuing these directives, which are crucial for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. The revocation of certain airworthiness directives, as detailed in CASA ADCX 025/12, aims to streamline regulations and reduce the regulatory burden while maintaining high safety standards in line with international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This legislative instrument was developed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and does not require a Regulatory Impact Statement, given its minimal impact on the public.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically CASA ADCX 025/12 concerning the Revocation of Airworthiness Directives, applies to entities and individuals involved in the aviation industry, including aircraft manufacturers, operators, and regulatory authorities. This legislation falls under the purview of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which grants the Governor-General the authority to create regulations aimed at ensuring the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for various types of aircraft or aeronautical products. Notably, this act also references international obligations under Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, emphasising the State of Design's responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types and the subsequent duty of the State of Registry to ensure the ongoing airworthiness of individual aircraft. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, aligning with Australia's obligations under international civil aviation agreements. Any ADs issued by the State of Design on or after 1 October 2009 must be accepted by CASA, which acts as Australia’s national airworthiness authority. This revocation of specific airworthiness directives is an administrative measure that reduces regulatory burden without necessitating public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as determined by the Office of Best Practice Regulation.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically under CASA ADCX 025/12, revoke certain Airworthiness Directives (ADs) that were previously issued for types of aircraft or aeronautical products. This action is authorised under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which allows the Governor-General to make regulations for the purposes of the Act and to ensure the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue these ADs. It is important to note that ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined under subregulation 39.001(5) of CASR 1998, and the requirements of these ADs have been superseded by EASA AD 2009-0114R1 Correction issued on 13 December 2012. These regulations impose several obligations on the parties and entities they govern. Firstly, the State of Design has the overarching responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, as stipulated in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This responsibility includes providing necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. The State of Registry, in turn, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. Non-compliance with the provisions of these ADs can lead to various consequences. Although the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 do not explicitly detail offences or penalties for breaching ADs, failure to comply with an accepted AD can result in serious safety implications. Such non-compliance might lead to actions by CASA, including enforcement measures, which can range from fines to more severe penalties such as grounding of aircraft until compliance is achieved. Additionally, continued non-compliance may result in legal action under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, leading to substantial penalties, both civil and criminal. These could include fines up to $210,000 for corporations and $42,000 for individuals, as well as imprisonment for up to two years. The exact penalties depend on the severity of the breach and the specific provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 that are contravened.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.