CASA ADCX 020/13 - Revocation of Airworthiness Directive

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L01828 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

CASA ADCX 020/13  Revocation of Airworthiness Directive

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions
(if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998. When a foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.

Revocation

This instrument revokes AD/A320/56 because the requirements of AD/A320/56 have been superseded by European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2013-0226 issued on 23 September 2013.

 

Consultation

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the revocation of AD/A320/56. This AD applied a foreign State of Design AD that was no longer in force in the State of Design and its retention would have been purposeless. The revocation results in a reduction of the regulatory burden. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

Regulation Impact Statement

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

 

The instrument commences on 25 October 2013.

 

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 020/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

CASA ADCX 020/13 Revocation of Airworthiness Directive

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to revoke an airworthiness directive (AD) that has been superseded by a foreign State of Design AD issued by the national airworthiness authority of the State of Design of the aeronautical product.

 

This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of a specified aeronautical product.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, were introduced to ensure the safety of air navigation in Australia. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the power to issue airworthiness directives (AD) for aircraft and aeronautical products to maintain and ensure safety standards. However, as international standards and practices evolve, it becomes necessary to revoke outdated or superseded ADs to streamline regulations and reduce the regulatory burden. This revocation of AD/A320/56, made under the authority delegated to CASA, addresses the problem of retaining unnecessary directives that no longer align with current safety standards. The revocation reduces the administrative load without compromising safety, as the superseded directive has been replaced by a more current and relevant European Aviation Safety Agency directive. The decision to revoke the directive was made without public consultation as it pertains to technical aviation safety standards rather than broader public interest matters.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended, apply to persons and entities involved in the operation, maintenance, and management of aircraft registered in Australia, including aircraft manufacturers, operators, maintenance service providers, and aviation personnel. These regulations are instrumental in ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, aligning with the international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). The geographic scope of these regulations extends nationally, overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), Australia's national airworthiness authority. CASA has the authority to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) that are binding unless specifically tailored to a particular person, aircraft, or aeronautical product. Additionally, the regulations allow for the acceptance and potential modification of foreign ADs issued by the State of Design of an aircraft type, ensuring a comprehensive approach to aviation safety that is consistent with international norms. Exclusions and exemptions from these regulations are limited and must be explicitly stated within the ADs themselves or through specific CASA approvals. Subordinate instruments may further refine the application of these regulations, allowing CASA to adapt to new safety standards and technological advancements in aviation.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide a framework for ensuring the safety of air navigation in Australia. Under regulation 39.001, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. This directive, as a legislative instrument, must be aligned with the overarching safety objectives stipulated in the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (sections 98(5B) and 98(5BA)). Furthermore, section 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 supports CASA's authority to revoke or amend such directives as necessary. The obligations imposed by these regulations on CASA include the acceptance of ADs issued by foreign States of Design, particularly those issued on or after 1 October 2013, as defined by regulation 39.001A of the CASR 1998. CASA must also ensure that these directives are either enforced or appropriately adjusted for the Australian context. This includes the ability to grant exclusions or approve alternative means of compliance when an AD is deemed unnecessary or inappropriate for specific circumstances. Such measures are designed to maintain the highest safety standards while also allowing flexibility where needed. In terms of compliance and enforcement, any breach of the ADs, including failure to comply with the revoked AD/A320/56, could result in significant civil or criminal penalties. Although the specific penalties for non-compliance with ADs are not detailed in the explanatory statement, they generally include fines and potential imprisonment, in line with the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and other relevant aviation safety legislation. These penalties serve as deterrents to non-compliance and ensure that all stakeholders adhere to the safety standards set forth by CASA. The revocation of AD/A320/56 as outlined in CASA ADCX 020/13 is justified due to the directive being superseded by a more recent and relevant AD issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA AD 2013-0226). The decision to revoke was made without further public consultation, as it was deemed unnecessary and inappropriate given the context and the superseded nature of the directive. This revocation aims to streamline regulations and reduce unnecessary regulatory burdens, thereby enhancing operational efficiency while maintaining safety standards.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Offence Provisions
Repeal & Amendment

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.