Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 018/17 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998, defines “airworthiness directive” to include Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. Accordingly, when a Foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, that AD applies to Australian aircraft. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.
Repeal
This instrument repeals AD/JBK 117/11 because the requirements of AD/JBK 117/11 have been superseded by Japan Civil Aviation Bureau (JCAB) TCD-4655A-2017 issued on 9 November 2017 with an effective date of 23 November 2017.
Consultation
No public or other consultation has taken place on the repeal of AD/JBK 117/11 because the requirements of AD/JBK 117/11 have been superseded by JCAB AD TCD-4655A-2017, which must now be complied with because it is a Foreign State of Design AD. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any consultation under section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003.
Regulation Impact Statement
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
The instrument commences on 23 November 2017.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 018/17]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 018/17 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that is no longer required as all affected parts have exceeded their service life and should no longer be in use.
This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, amended by F2017L01473, address the need to streamline airworthiness directives (AD) to ensure compliance with current safety standards and international obligations. Enacted under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs, which are legislative instruments that ensure aircraft and aeronautical products maintain their airworthiness. The repeal of AD/JBK 117/11, as detailed in F2017L01473, was necessitated by the issuance of a more recent AD by the Japan Civil Aviation Bureau. This change aligns with international standards under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which mandates the State of Design's responsibility for an aircraft type's continuing airworthiness. The repeal aims to eliminate outdated safety directives, facilitating compliance with the latest standards and ensuring the safe operation of aircraft on the Australian Register.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) govern the civil aviation sector in Australia, providing a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety of aircraft and aeronautical products. The Act applies to all aircraft, aeronautical products, and aviation-related entities operating within Australia. The geographical reach of the Act is national, with the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) being the regulatory body responsible for its enforcement. Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA can issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for types of aircraft or aeronautical products, which are legislative instruments unless they pertain to specific individuals, aircraft, or products. Additionally, CASA has the authority to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any AD, in accordance with the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The repealed AD/JBK 117/11 has been superseded by the JCAB AD TCD-4655A-2017, which now governs the continuing airworthiness of the affected aircraft. The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA and commenced on 23 November 2017. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights has been provided, indicating that the repealed directive does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide the framework for ensuring the safety and airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products within Australia. Specifically, section 39.001 of the CASR 1998 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (AD) for a type of aircraft or aeronautical product, unless such directives are explicitly limited to a particular person, aircraft, or product. Furthermore, under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General can make regulations, and these regulations can be repealed, rescinded, revoked, amended, or varied under section 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. This legislative flexibility ensures that safety standards can be updated in response to new information or technological advancements.
The CASR 1998 also places certain obligations on the parties it governs. For instance, the State of Design has a responsibility under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. This includes providing necessary information to States of Registry, who in turn must develop or adopt requirements to maintain the airworthiness of aircraft within their jurisdiction. Additionally, when a Foreign State of Design issues an AD, it applies to Australian aircraft unless CASA grants an exclusion or approves an alternative means of compliance.
Breaching the provisions of the CASR 1998 can lead to significant consequences. While the explanatory statement does not specify exact penalties, CASA has the authority to enforce compliance through various means. Offences under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 could result in both civil and criminal penalties. For example, operating an aircraft in a manner that contravenes airworthiness directives could lead to fines and imprisonment. It is essential for aircraft owners, operators, and maintenance personnel to adhere strictly to ADs to avoid legal repercussions.
In summary, the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empower CASA to issue and manage airworthiness directives that ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft. These regulations impose clear obligations on the State of Design and States of Registry, mandating them to provide and implement necessary measures for maintaining airworthiness. Non-compliance with these directives can result in severe civil and criminal penalties, underscoring the importance of adhering to the stipulated requirements.