CASA ADCX 017/17 - Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2017L01440 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

CASA ADCX 017/17 Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998, defines “airworthiness directive” to include Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. Accordingly, when a Foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, that AD applies to Australian aircraft. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.

Repeal

This instrument repeals AD/FPE/12 because the requirements of AD/FPE/12 are no longer required due to all affected parts having a finite service life which would now have expired. Consequently the parts should no longer be in use and the requirements of the AD are now redundant.

Consultation

No public or other consultation has taken place on the repeal of AD/FPE/12 because the requirements of AD/FPE/12 have become redundant. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any consultation under section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003.


Regulation Impact Statement

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

The instrument commences on 17 November 2017.

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 017/17]


 

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

CASA ADCX 017/17 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that is no longer required due to all affected parts having a finite service life which would now have expired. Consequently the parts should no longer be in use and the requirements of the AD are now redundant.

This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

 

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted by the Governor-General under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, aim to ensure the safety of civil aviation within Australia. These regulations, including the ability to issue airworthiness directives, are designed to uphold the safety standards required by Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This specific piece of legislation, F2017L01440, seeks to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that has become redundant due to the finite service life of the affected aircraft parts, which have now expired. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) made this legislative instrument under a delegation of authority and it commenced on 17 November 2017. This repeal addresses a gap where the continued enforcement of an obsolete AD would be unnecessary and potentially misleading, as the affected parts should no longer be in use.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), amended by CASA ADCX 017/17, primarily applies to entities and individuals involved in civil aviation in Australia, including aircraft operators, manufacturers, and maintenance providers. The regulation pertains to the airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, ensuring they meet safety standards. Geographically, its application extends to all aircraft and aeronautical products registered in Australia, aligning with the responsibilities outlined in the Convention on International Civil Aviation's Annex 8. The repeal of AD/FPE/12 under this instrument specifically targets obsolete airworthiness directives that are no longer necessary due to the expiry of service life of affected parts. This regulation does not require consultation or a Regulation Impact Statement as it addresses redundant requirements. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms, ensuring no adverse human rights implications arise from its application.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) outline the requirements and obligations for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products in Australia. Under section 39.001 of the CASR 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is empowered to issue airworthiness directives (AD) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are legislative instruments unless they are specifically directed at a particular person, aircraft, or aeronautical product (sections 98(5B) and (5BA) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988). The regulations also allow for the repeal, amendment, or variation of these ADs (subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901). The obligations imposed by the CASR 1998 and the ADs include the responsibility of the State of Design to provide information necessary for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, as well as the duty of the State of Registry to develop or adopt requirements ensuring the airworthiness of individual aircraft. CASA, as the regulator, has the authority to issue ADs, grant exclusions, or approve alternative means of compliance (regulation 39.001A of the CASR 1998). These obligations are in line with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which delineates the roles and responsibilities of the States of Design and Registry. The legislative instrument in question specifically repeals AD/FPE/12 due to the finite service life of all affected parts, which has now expired, rendering the AD redundant. Consequently, there are no longer any requirements for inspection, rectification, or maintenance as previously mandated by AD/FPE/12. The repeal does not involve any public consultation or require a Regulation Impact Statement, as the AD's requirements are no longer necessary and a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation exempts ADs from requiring a RIS. The instrument is also deemed compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms, as detailed in the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights. In terms of penalties and consequences, any breach of the CASR 1998 or non-compliance with an AD could lead to enforcement actions by CASA, including fines or other administrative penalties. While the repealed AD/FPE/12 no longer applies, adherence to other relevant ADs and regulations remains mandatory to ensure continued compliance with airworthiness standards. The maximum penalties for breaches of the CASR 1998 can vary depending on the nature and severity of the offence, with potential fines reaching up to $222,200 for corporations and $44,440 for individuals, as stipulated in the relevant sections of the Civil Aviation Act 1988.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.