CASA ADCX 017/14 - Repeal of Airworthiness Directives

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2014L01262 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

CASA ADCX 017/14 Repeal of Airworthiness Directives

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions
(if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998. When a foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.

Repeal

This instrument repeals 3 ADs for the following reasons.

This instrument repeals AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1 because existing legislation addresses the unsafe condition identified by AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1. CASA Airworthiness Bulletin (AWB) 61-011 has been issued concurrently with this cancellation to provide guidance and recommendations on what actions are required in the event of a propeller strike event.

 

This instrument repeals AD/LEARJET 35/12 because the unsafe condition which this AD was issued to correct has now been addressed by updates to the aircraft manufacturer’s instructions for continuing airworthiness.

 

This instrument also repeals AD/RAD/93 because the requirements of AD/RAD/93 will be superseded by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2010-0003R2 issued on 17 September 2014 with an effective date of 14 October 2014.

 

Consultation

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the repeal of AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1, AD/RAD/93 and AD/LEARJET 35/12. AD/RAD/93 applied a foreign State of Design AD that will no longer be in force in the State of Design. AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1 duplicated existing legislation which addresses the unsafe condition identified by AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1. AD/LEARJET 35/12 contained corrective actions which are now contained in the aircraft manufacturer’s instructions for continuing airworthiness. The retention of these ADs would have been purposeless. The repeals result in a reduction of the regulatory burden. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.

 

Regulation Impact Statement

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

The instrument commences on 24 September 2014.

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 017/14]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

CASA ADCX 017/14  Repeal of Airworthiness Directives

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal AD/RAD/93 which applied a foreign State of Design AD that will no longer be in force in the State of Design, AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1 which duplicated existing legislation which addresses the unsafe condition identified by AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1 and AD/LEARJET 35/12 which contained corrective actions which are now contained in the aircraft manufacturer’s instructions for continuing airworthiness.

 

These ADs relate to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, allow for the creation of regulations necessary for the safety of air navigation. This particular legislative instrument, CASA ADCX 017/14, was introduced to address the redundancy and overlap in existing airworthiness directives (ADs) which had been superseded by new legislative measures or manufacturer updates. The instrument was made by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) and is consistent with international standards set by the Convention on International Civil Aviation, particularly Annex 8 which mandates the State of Design's responsibility for continuing airworthiness. The policy objective here is to streamline regulatory requirements and reduce the burden on stakeholders by repealing outdated or redundant ADs. The instrument repeals three specific ADs: AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1, AD/LEARJET 35/12, and AD/RAD/93, due to their duplication with existing legislation or updates from the aircraft manufacturer and the superseding of AD/RAD/93 by a European Aviation Safety Agency directive.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) govern the safety of air navigation in Australia, and under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General has the authority to enact regulations in the interests of air navigation safety. The Act applies to all individuals, entities, and industries involved in civil aviation within Australia, including aircraft operators, maintenance organisations, and aviation personnel. Geographically, the Act's reach extends across the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring consistent safety standards nationwide. The Act allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for aircraft and aeronautical products, which are legislative instruments unless they specifically apply to a particular person, aircraft, or product. This legislative instrument specifically repeals three ADs: AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1, AD/RAD/93, and AD/LEARJET 35/12. AD/ENG/6 Amdt 1 is repealed because existing legislation already addresses the safety issue it was intended to correct. AD/RAD/93 is repealed as it applies a foreign State of Design AD that is no longer in force. AD/LEARJET 35/12 is repealed because the corrective actions it mandated are now included in the aircraft manufacturer’s instructions for continuing airworthiness. The repeals aim to reduce regulatory burden without compromising safety. The instrument was made under delegated authority and commenced on 24 September 2014.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide the framework under which airworthiness directives (ADs) can be issued, amended, or repealed (section 39.001). These regulations permit the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue ADs for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure the safety of air navigation (section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988). The Act empowers CASA to issue ADs as legislative instruments unless they are expressly stated to apply to a particular person, aircraft, or aeronautical product (subsection 98(5B) and (5BA)). These ADs must align with international standards, particularly those outlined in Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, which mandates that the State of Design holds the overall responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type. The obligations imposed by the CASR 1998 on the parties and entities it governs include ensuring compliance with the ADs issued by CASA. Specifically, the State of Registry of an individual aircraft must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft (subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901). Additionally, CASA must accept foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009, but it may grant exclusions from these ADs or approve alternative means of compliance (regulation 39.001A). The repeal of certain ADs, as detailed in CASA ADCX 017/14, signifies that these specific ADs are no longer necessary due to existing legislation, updates in aircraft manufacturer instructions, or the superseding of requirements by other regulatory authorities. Breaches of the CASR 1998 and the Civil Aviation Act 1988 can result in both civil and criminal penalties. While the explanatory statement does not specify the exact penalties for each offence, under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, non-compliance with ADs can lead to significant fines and, in severe cases, imprisonment. The maximum penalties for breaches of safety regulations can vary, but they typically include substantial fines and potential imprisonment terms for individuals and organisations found guilty of non-compliance. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 also outline procedures for enforcement and the imposition of penalties for non-compliance with airworthiness directives.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.