Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 015/16 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions
(if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998. When a foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.
Repeal
This instrument repeals AD/CESSNA 170/84 because the requirements of AD/CESSNA 170/84 have been superseded by United States of America Federal Aviation Administration AD 2016-14-05 issued on 28 June 2016 with an effective date of 11 August 2016.
Consultation
No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the repeal of AD/CESSNA 170/84. This AD applied a foreign State of Design AD that will no longer be in force in the State of Design and its retention would have been purposeless. The repeal results in a reduction of the regulatory burden. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003.
Regulation Impact Statement
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
The instrument commences on 11 August 2016.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 015/16]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 015/16 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that has been superseded by a foreign State of Design AD issued by the national airworthiness authority of the State of Design of the aircraft or aeronautical product.
This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were enacted by the Australian Government to ensure the safety of air navigation and to provide a regulatory framework for civil aviation safety in Australia. This legislation allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. ADs are essential for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, ensuring compliance with safety standards, and preventing accidents. The regulations were introduced to address the need for a unified and stringent safety framework, given the complexity and risk associated with aviation. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 grants CASA the authority to make these regulations, aiming to protect public safety and facilitate the orderly development of civil aviation in Australia. The repeal of certain ADs, as seen in the recent amendment, reflects the dynamic nature of aviation safety standards and the necessity to align Australian regulations with international best practices.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, governs the safety of air navigation within Australia and applies to aircraft registered in Australia, aircraft operators, and other entities involved in civil aviation. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is empowered under the Act to issue airworthiness directives (AD) concerning aircraft or aeronautical products, with these directives being legislative instruments unless they pertain to a specific person, aircraft, or aeronautical product. The scope of this legislation extends to all aircraft registered in Australia and to entities involved in the manufacture, maintenance, and operation of these aircraft. Geographically, its jurisdiction covers the entire Commonwealth of Australia, aligning with national aviation safety standards and international obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The regulations permit CASA to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any AD as necessary, which is exercised through subordinate instruments under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. This particular legislative instrument, CASA ADCX 015/16, repeals AD/CESSNA 170/84 due to its supersession by a newer directive issued by the United States Federal Aviation Administration, thus reducing regulatory burden without requiring further public consultation or a Regulation Impact Statement. The instrument is deemed compatible with human rights as it does not engage any of the rights or freedoms recognised under relevant international instruments.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) contain provisions that allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure safety (section 39.001). This instrument specifically repeals AD/CESSNA 170/84, which required inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products. The repeal is due to the fact that AD/CESSNA 170/84 has been superseded by a more recent AD issued by the United States of America Federal Aviation Administration (AD 2016-14-05). This new AD, issued on 28 June 2016, became effective on 11 August 2016, rendering the older directive obsolete.
The repeal of AD/CESSNA 170/84 places obligations on CASA, as the national airworthiness authority, to accept the new AD 2016-14-05 for aircraft types registered in Australia. CASA is also permitted to grant an exclusion from the new AD or approve alternative means of compliance that meet the safety standards set forth by the original AD, provided these alternatives do not compromise safety. This process ensures that the regulatory framework remains aligned with international safety standards while offering flexibility to address specific circumstances that may arise.
Failure to comply with the provisions of an AD can result in severe consequences, including potential criminal penalties for operators who fail to adhere to the safety requirements. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (section 33) provides that non-compliance with airworthiness directives can lead to fines and imprisonment for individuals and corporations. The maximum penalties for breaches of airworthiness directives are substantial, reflecting the critical importance of safety in civil aviation. CASA has the authority to enforce these provisions rigorously to maintain the high safety standards expected in the industry.
In summary, the key operative sections of this legislation pertain to the repeal of an outdated AD in favour of a more current directive issued by the relevant national authority. The obligations imposed on CASA and aircraft operators include the acceptance and implementation of the new AD, with provisions for exceptions or alternative compliance methods where appropriate. The potential civil and criminal consequences for non-compliance are significant, underscoring the importance of adhering to the airworthiness directives issued under CASR 1998.