CASA ADCX 012/15 - Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2015L01297 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

CASA ADCX 012/15 Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions
(if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998. When a foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.

Repeal

This instrument repeals CASA AD/B737/23 Amdt 3 because the requirements of AD/B737/23 Amdt 3 have been superseded by United States of America AD 201515-05 issued on 10 July 2015 with an effective date of 28 August 2015.

 

Consultation

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the repeal of AD/B737/23 Amdt 3. This AD applied a foreign State of Design AD that will no longer be in force in the State of Design and its retention would have been purposeless. The repeal results in a reduction of the regulatory burden. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003.


Regulation Impact Statement

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

The instrument commences on 28 August 2015.

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 012/15]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

CASA ADCX 012/15 Repeal of Airworthiness Directive

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that has been superseded by a later foreign State of Design AD that applies to Australian aircraft.

 

The repealed AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted by the Australian Government to ensure the safety of civil aviation, aligning with the Civil Aviation Act 1988. This legislation was introduced to address the need for comprehensive regulations governing airworthiness and continuing airworthiness of aircraft within Australia. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), as the national airworthiness authority, was granted the power to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) to maintain safety standards, a responsibility delegated by the Governor-General under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The objective of this regulatory framework is to harmonise Australia’s aviation safety standards with international norms, particularly those outlined in Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. This instrument, CASA ADCX 012/15, specifically targets the repeal of CASA AD/B737/23 Amdt 3 due to its supersession by a more recent United States of America AD, thereby reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens without compromising safety.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by CASA ADCX 012/15, apply to all aircraft and aeronautical products registered in Australia, ensuring their continuing airworthiness in accordance with international standards. This regulation is applicable nationally, aligning with the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) to maintain the safety of air navigation. ADs are legislative instruments unless they specify particular persons, aircraft, or aeronautical products, and they must be accepted by CASA when issued by foreign States of Design. CASA may grant exclusions or approve alternative means of compliance. The repeal of a specific AD, CASA AD/B737/23 Amdt 3, reflects the supersession by a newer AD from the United States, reducing regulatory burden without necessitating further consultation due to its redundant nature. The repeal does not engage any human rights issues as stated in the accompanying Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) are amended by this instrument, which repeals CASA AD/B737/23 Amdt 3. This repeal occurs because the requirements previously stipulated in AD/B737/23 Amdt 3 have been superseded by a more recent directive from the United States of America, AD 2015-15-05, issued on 10 July 2015 and effective from 28 August 2015. The repealed directive pertained to the inspection and rectification or maintenance of specific aircraft or aeronautical products. By repealing AD/B737/23 Amdt 3, the regulations align with the latest international standards and ensure that Australian aviation safety requirements remain current and effective. This change reflects the dynamic nature of aviation safety standards, which must continually evolve to address new safety concerns and technological advancements. The obligations imposed by this legislative instrument primarily concern CASA and the State of Registry of the aircraft. CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, is required to ensure that any airworthiness directive issued by a foreign State of Design is accepted unless an exclusion is granted or an alternative means of compliance is approved. In this instance, the repeal of AD/B737/23 Amdt 3 reflects CASA’s responsibility to update and maintain regulatory alignment with international standards. The State of Registry must also ensure that the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft on the Australian Register complies with the latest applicable directives, ensuring that safety standards are uniformly enforced across all registered aircraft. There are no direct offences or penalties outlined in this legislative instrument concerning the repeal of AD/B737/23 Amdt 3. However, failure to comply with airworthiness directives can lead to significant civil and criminal consequences under the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and CASR 1998. These may include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the non-compliance and its impact on aviation safety. Specifically, under section 56 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, a person who contravenes a regulation or direction may be liable for a penalty. For corporations, the maximum penalty for a serious contravention is $5.25 million, while individuals face a maximum penalty of $1.05 million or imprisonment for up to five years, or both. These stringent penalties underscore the importance of adhering to airworthiness directives and maintaining the highest standards of aviation safety. The instrument also addresses the need for a Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) and public consultation. Given that ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation, an RIS is not required for this particular repeal. Furthermore, CASA deemed it unnecessary to consult the Australian public on this matter, as the repealed AD was redundant due to the issuance of a more recent directive by the State of Design. The repeal results in a reduction of the regulatory burden, aligning Australian regulations with current international standards and ensuring that the regulatory framework remains efficient and effective. Additionally, a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is provided, confirming that this legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms, thus ensuring compliance with human rights obligations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Environmental Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Commencement Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.