Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Revocation of Airworthiness Directives
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Under the previous subregulation 39.001(5) of CASR 1998, an AD was a legislative instrument. This is still the situation under subsection 98(5B) of the Act.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs per Civil Aviation Safety Regulations Part 39.001A.
AD/DAUPHIN/27 Amdt 6
A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A. The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2012-0067 issued on
24 April 2012.
AD/ARRIEL/6 Amdt 1
A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A. The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2012-0071 issued on
26 April 2012.
AD/CRESCO/13
A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A. The requirements of this airworthiness directive which referred to CAA NZ DCA/CRESCO/12 have been superseded by CAA NZ DCA/CRESCO/12A issued on 26 April 2012.
AD/FU24/67
A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A. The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by CAA (NZ) DCA/FU24/178A issued on 26 April 2012.
Consultation
Foreign State of Design ADs are defined as ADs by CASR regulation 39.001A. Therefore if an Australian AD has its requirements superseded by the requirements of a State of Design AD, those requirements may under regulation 39.001A be given effect to without public consultation.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Compatibility with human rights and freedoms
This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Human Rights Implications
The instrument sets out technical requirements as detailed above. The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
The instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms.
This AD cancellation has been made by the Manager, Initial Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 010/12]
Overview
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation within the country. This legislation was introduced to address the need for stringent regulations to maintain air safety standards, and it was enacted by the Parliament of Australia. The overarching policy objective of this regulatory framework is to protect the safety of air navigation and to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft operating in Australian airspace. Specifically, the Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers the Governor-General to make regulations that serve the interests of safety in air navigation. These regulations are designed to be in line with international standards, particularly under the Convention on International Civil Aviation, where the State of Design holds the primary responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, which allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for aircraft and aeronautical products, further support these objectives by enabling CASA to implement and enforce necessary safety measures.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by the specified instrument, primarily govern the revocation of certain airworthiness directives (ADs) issued under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. This regulation applies to all aircraft registered in Australia and any aeronautical products subject to Australian civil aviation safety oversight, thereby extending its jurisdiction across the nation. The revocation of ADs concerns the formal cancellation of directives issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) or foreign states, specifically those issued on or after 1 October 2009, which have since been superseded by other regulatory instruments, such as those from the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) or the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand (CAA NZ). These revocations ensure that only the most current and relevant safety directives are in effect, maintaining the highest safety standards in line with international civil aviation conventions. The process of revoking these directives is conducted by CASA, Australia's national airworthiness authority, which ensures compliance with the Convention on International Civil Aviation and its annexes, particularly Annex 8, which pertains to airworthiness of aircraft. This legislative instrument also clarifies that the revocation of ADs does not necessitate public consultation and is deemed to be compatible with human rights and freedoms as recognised in international human rights instruments.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, in particular the revocation of certain airworthiness directives (ADs) as detailed in CASA ADCX 010/12, pertain to the regulation and oversight of airworthiness standards for aircraft and aeronautical products in Australia. Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General has the authority to make regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation. Regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These ADs are considered legislative instruments, as outlined in subsection 98(5B) of the Act.
The obligations imposed by the Act and the CASR on parties and entities include compliance with airworthiness directives issued by CASA. When a State of Design issues an AD for an aircraft type on the Australian Register, CASA must accept and implement that AD. The State of Design is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of the aircraft type and must provide necessary information to the State of Registry, which, in turn, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. These requirements must be adhered to by aircraft operators and other relevant parties.
Breaches of airworthiness directives can lead to severe consequences, including potential civil and criminal penalties. Under the Act, failure to comply with an airworthiness directive can result in significant fines and imprisonment. The specific penalties depend on the severity and intent behind the non-compliance. Civil penalties can include fines up to a substantial amount, while criminal penalties can extend to imprisonment for several years. These provisions ensure that airworthiness standards are strictly enforced to maintain the safety and integrity of air navigation in Australia.