Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 008/13 — Revocation of Airworthiness Directives
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Under subsections 98(5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998.
Revocation
The requirements of AD/CF6/45 have been superseded by United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AD 2013-08-20 issued on 16 April 2013.
The requirements of AD/B727/192 have been superseded by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2013-0070 issued on 18 March 2013.
Consequently, these ADs are being revoked.
Consultation
No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the cancellation of these ADs because the cancellations result in a reduction of the regulatory burden. They applied airworthiness directives that were no longer in force in the State of Design and their retention would have been purposeless.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Compatibility with human rights and freedoms
A statement of compatibility with human rights is at Attachment 1.
Commencement and making
The instrument commences on 8 May 2013.
The ADs have been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 008/13]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 008/13 — Revocation of Airworthiness Directives
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to revoke legislative instruments that have been superseded.
The requirements of AD/CF6/45 have been superseded by United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) AD 2013-08-20 issued on 16 April 2013.
The requirements of AD/B727/192 have been superseded by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2013-0070 issued on 18 March 2013.
These airworthiness directives relate to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation, in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988. These regulations empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning types of aircraft or aeronautical products. Given the global nature of aviation, ADs issued by the State of Design are accepted by CASA as Australia’s national airworthiness authority. However, certain ADs may become superseded by newer directives issued by other international regulatory bodies, rendering them obsolete. To streamline regulations and reduce unnecessary burden, CASA has revoked specific ADs that have been superseded by newer directives from the United States Federal Aviation Administration and the European Aviation Safety Agency, effective from 8 May 2013. This revocation was made under the delegation powers provided in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 and the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with a statement of compatibility affirming that the revocation does not engage any human rights or freedoms.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended, and specifically under regulation 39.001, empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) concerning types of aircraft or aeronautical products to ensure the safety of air navigation. These directives are applicable to aircraft registered in Australia and are subject to the overarching responsibilities of the State of Design and the State of Registry as per Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. ADs are generally considered legislative instruments unless explicitly stated otherwise, applying to particular persons, aircraft, or aeronautical products. This legislative framework is designed to maintain the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products within Australia's jurisdiction, adhering to international standards and requirements. The revocation of certain ADs, as evidenced by CASA ADCX 008/13, is undertaken when these directives are superseded by more recent directives from other regulatory bodies, such as the FAA or EASA, which ensures that the regulatory burden is not unnecessarily increased and that only current and relevant safety requirements are enforced. This revocation process reflects CASA's role in harmonising Australian regulations with international standards while maintaining a focus on safety.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) under section 39.001 allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for types of aircraft or aeronautical products. These directives aim to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products registered in Australia. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides the legal framework for these directives, with section 98 enabling the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act, particularly for the safety of air navigation. The revocation of certain ADs, as detailed in CASA ADCX 008/13, is based on the fact that these have been superseded by directives issued by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Specifically, AD/CF6/45 has been superseded by FAA AD 2013-08-20, and AD/B727/192 has been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0070. These revocations reflect the latest international standards and practices in aviation safety.
Under the CASR 1998, the obligations of CASA include the acceptance and enforcement of ADs issued by the State of Design for aircraft types registered in Australia. When the State of Design issues an AD, CASA must accept and implement it unless it applies to a particular person, aircraft, or aeronautical product. The State of Registry is also responsible for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft. CASA must ensure that these directives are followed to maintain the safety standards of the Australian aviation industry. Additionally, under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has the responsibility to provide necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft types. CASA's role is to align with these international standards and ensure compliance within Australia.
There are no specific offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences outlined for the breach of the revoked ADs in this legislation. However, non-compliance with ADs generally can lead to serious consequences. Under CASR 1998, failure to comply with an AD can result in significant penalties. For instance, CASA can impose fines and take enforcement actions against non-compliant aircraft operators or aeronautical product manufacturers. These actions can include grounding of aircraft, suspension of airworthiness certificates, or other regulatory measures. The maximum penalties for breaches of aviation safety regulations can be substantial, reflecting the high importance of maintaining safety standards in aviation.
The legislative instrument also addresses the compatibility of the revocation of these ADs with human rights. A statement of compatibility with human rights is provided, affirming that the revocation does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. This statement, prepared in accordance with the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, ensures that the revocation of these directives does not infringe on any human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in the Act. Consequently, CASA ADCX 008/13 is deemed compatible with human rights, as it does not raise any human rights issues. The instrument comes into effect on 8 May 2013, with CASA making the ADs under delegated authority as specified in the CASR 1998 and the Civil Aviation Act 1988.