Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 006/21 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
AD/CON/63 Amdt 2
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the purpose of carrying out and giving effect to the provisions of the Convention on International Civil Aviation relating to safety, amongst other things. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Regulation 39.001A of CASR, defines “airworthiness directive” to include foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. Accordingly, when a foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, that AD applies to Australian aircraft. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.
Repeal
This instrument repeals AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 – Connecting Rods (AD/CON/63 Amdt 2), which applies to Continental Motors piston engines, because the requirements of AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 have been incorporated into the Continental Aircraft Engine Publication M-0 “Standard Practice Maintenance Manual”.
Consultation
No public or other consultation has taken place on the repeal of AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 because the requirements of this AD have been incorporated into the engine manufacturer’s instructions for continuing airworthiness which must be complied with and therefore, AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 is no longer necessary. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any consultation under section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003.
Regulation Impact Statement
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs (OBPR id. 14507).
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
The instrument commences on 4 June 2021.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 006/21]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 006/21 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
AD/CON/63 Amdt 2
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that is no longer required.
This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted by the Australian Government, were introduced to ensure the safety of civil aviation, including the airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products, in accordance with the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the enacting body, authorised under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 to make regulations for the purpose of carrying out and giving effect to the provisions of the Convention on International Civil Aviation relating to safety. The primary policy objective of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 is to maintain the highest practicable level of safety in civil aviation through the regulation of airworthiness standards, licensing, and operational oversight. This particular legislative instrument, CASA ADCX 006/21, addresses the need to repeal an airworthiness directive that has been rendered redundant by updated manufacturer guidance, ensuring that regulations remain current and relevant.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by CASA ADCX 006/21, address the repeal of Airworthiness Directive AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 concerning Continental Motors piston engines. This regulation applies to all entities and persons responsible for the maintenance and operation of aircraft registered in Australia that use Continental Motors piston engines, ensuring compliance with updated maintenance standards. The repeal is based on the integration of the directive's requirements into the Continental Aircraft Engine Publication M-0 “Standard Practice Maintenance Manual”, which is now the authoritative source for continuing airworthiness. The regulation extends nationally within Australia, aligning with the obligations under the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The repeal does not affect the broader scope of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 or introduce any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds beyond the specific directive repealed. Subordinate instruments may further define the application of these regulations, ensuring comprehensive coverage and enforcement within the aviation sector.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation pertain to the repeal of Airworthiness Directive AD/CON/63 Amendment 2 (AD/CON/63 Amdt 2) which previously applied to Continental Motors piston engines. Section 1 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs), and regulation 39.001A of CASR defines an airworthiness directive to include foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. The repeal of AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 is detailed in section 3 of the instrument CASA ADCX 006/21. This repeal is justified because the requirements previously stipulated in AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 have been incorporated into the Continental Aircraft Engine Publication M-0 "Standard Practice Maintenance Manual". Therefore, AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 is no longer necessary for ensuring the continuing airworthiness of Australian aircraft.
The obligations imposed on parties by this legislation include the requirement for aircraft operators and maintenance personnel to adhere to the updated maintenance procedures as outlined in the Continental Aircraft Engine Publication M-0. Specifically, they must ensure that any inspection and maintenance tasks previously mandated by AD/CON/63 Amdt 2 are now performed according to the manufacturer’s latest instructions. This transition necessitates that all relevant personnel are informed of the repeal and updated procedures to maintain compliance with airworthiness standards.
There are no specific offences or penalties outlined in the instrument for the repeal itself, as the primary purpose is to streamline and update regulatory requirements rather than enforce compliance through punitive measures. However, failure to comply with airworthiness directives, including the updated maintenance instructions from the engine manufacturer, could result in serious safety issues and potential enforcement actions under other provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and CASR. Non-compliance with airworthiness requirements can lead to severe consequences such as grounding of the aircraft, fines, and in some cases, criminal charges. The penalties for breaches of airworthiness regulations can include fines of up to $222,200 for individuals and $1,111,000 for bodies corporate, as stipulated under the Civil Aviation Act 1988.
In summary, this legislation serves to repeal an outdated airworthiness directive by integrating its requirements into the manufacturer’s updated maintenance manual, ensuring that safety standards remain current and effectively enforced. It places the onus on aircraft operators and maintenance personnel to adapt to the new procedures, with the overarching goal of maintaining the highest standards of aviation safety. The potential for severe penalties underscores the importance of strict adherence to these updated regulatory requirements.