Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 006/17 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product. Under subsections 98 (5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. Regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998, defines “airworthiness directive” to include Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. Accordingly, when a Foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, that AD applies to Australian aircraft. However, CASA may grant an exclusion from the AD or approve an acceptable means of compliance other than that set out in the AD.
Repeal
This instrument repeals AD/JETSTREAM/69 Amdt 4 because the requirements of AD/JETSTREAM/69 Amdt 4 have been superseded by European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2017-0053 (Correction) issued on 24 March 2017 with an effective date of 7 April 2017.
EASA AD 2017-0053 (Correction) is freely available from the CASA and FAA websites.
Consultation
No public or other consultation has taken place on the repeal of AD/JETSTREAM/69 Amdt 4 because the requirements of AD/JETSTREAM/69 Amdt 4 have been superseded by EASA AD 2017-0053 (Correction), which must now be complied with because it is a Foreign State of Design AD. For this reason, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any consultation under section 17 of the Legislation Act 2003.
Regulation Impact Statement
A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because ADs are covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation under which a RIS is not required for ADs.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
The instrument commences on 7 April 2017.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 006/17]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 006/17 — Repeal of Airworthiness Directive
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal an airworthiness directive (AD) that has been superseded by a foreign State of Design AD issued by the national airworthiness authority of the State of Design of the aircraft or aeronautical product.
This AD relates to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aircraft or aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provide the framework for ensuring the safety of civil aviation in Australia. These regulations were introduced to address the need for comprehensive and enforceable safety standards within the aviation industry, ensuring both public and operational safety. Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Governor-General has the authority to make these regulations, which are designed to maintain the highest safety standards in alignment with international conventions and practices. The policy objective is to facilitate safe and efficient air navigation by imposing stringent safety requirements on aircraft and aeronautical products, ensuring compliance with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization. This legislative framework empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives, which are critical for maintaining the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) apply to the continuing airworthiness of all aircraft registered in Australia and to aeronautical products used on these aircraft. This regulatory framework is established under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for particular types of aircraft or aeronautical products. The application of ADs is not limited to Australian-designed aircraft but extends to aircraft designed in other countries, provided the State of Design complies with Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. CASA may, however, grant exclusions from these directives or approve alternative means of compliance. The repeal of AD/JETSTREAM/69 Amdt 4, as described in the legislation, reflects the authority CASA has to adjust regulations in response to updated or superseded directives from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and other international authorities. The repeal is effective as of the same date the superseding directive takes effect, ensuring that Australian aviation regulations remain aligned with international standards.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) provide a framework for the regulation of civil aviation safety in Australia. Regulation 39.001 of CASR 1998 allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue an airworthiness directive (AD) for a kind of aircraft or aeronautical product (section 39.001). An AD is a legislative instrument unless it applies to a particular person, aircraft, or aeronautical product (subsection 98(5B) and (5BA) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988). The authority to issue an AD includes the power to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument (subsection 33(3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901). The State of Design has the overall responsibility for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to ensure its airworthiness (Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation). The State of Registry is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an individual aircraft, developing or adopting requirements to ensure it (Annex 8). Regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998 defines an airworthiness directive to include Foreign State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009. Thus, when a Foreign State of Design issues an AD for a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, that AD applies to Australian aircraft, though CASA may grant an exclusion or approve an alternative means of compliance (regulation 39.001A).
The obligations imposed by this legislation on the parties and entities it governs include ensuring the continuing airworthiness of aircraft by complying with applicable ADs. The State of Design must provide necessary information to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type (Annex 8), and the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of individual aircraft (Annex 8). CASA, as the regulator, has the authority to issue, amend, or repeal ADs to ensure compliance with safety standards (subsection 98(5B) and (5BA) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988). Operators and owners of aircraft must ensure that their aircraft comply with all applicable ADs, including those issued by Foreign States of Design.
The legislation also specifies consequences for non-compliance with ADs. Failure to comply with an AD may result in civil or criminal penalties, depending on the severity of the non-compliance and the specific provisions of the AD. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, an operator of an aircraft who contravenes an AD may be guilty of an offence and subject to a penalty of up to 50 penalty units for individuals and 250 penalty units for bodies corporate (section 28). Serious non-compliance may also result in criminal charges, potentially leading to imprisonment. The penalties for non-compliance are intended to enforce compliance with safety standards and protect the public from the risks associated with non-airworthy aircraft.