Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998
CASA ADCX 004/13 — Revocation of Airworthiness Directives
Legislation
Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products. Under subsections 98(5B) and (5BA) of the Act, an AD is a legislative instrument unless it is expressed to apply in relation to a particular person, a particular aircraft or a particular aeronautical product.
Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry. ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information and are issued by most International Civil Aviation Organization Contracting States.
The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness. Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD. State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs under regulation 39.001A of CASR 1998.
Revocation
The requirements of AD/TBM 700/19 Amdt 1 have been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0035 issued on 22 February 2013.
The requirements of AD/DHC-8/135 have been superseded by Transport Canada AD CF-2007-32R1 issued on 1 March 2013.
Consequently, these ADs are being revoked.
Consultation
No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on the cancellation of these ADs because the cancellation results in a reduction of the regulatory burden.
The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.
Compatibility with human rights and freedoms
A statement of compatibility with human rights is at Attachment 1.
Commencement and making
The instrument commences on 8 March 2013.
The AD has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of CASR 1998 and subsection 94 (1) of the Act.
[Instrument number CASA ADCX 004/13]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
CASA ADCX 004/13 —- Revocation of Airworthiness Directives
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
The purpose of this legislative instrument is to revoke 2 legislative instruments that have been superseded.
The requirements of CASA airworthiness directive AD/TBM 700/19 Amdt 1 have been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0035 issued on 22 February 2013. The requirements of CASA airworthiness directive AD/DHC-8/135 have been superseded by Transport Canada AD CF-2007-32R1 issued on 1 March 2013.
Those airworthiness directives relate to inspection and rectification or maintenance of specified aeronautical products.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority
Overview
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) were enacted to ensure the safety of air navigation and to facilitate the continuing airworthiness of aircraft. This piece of legislation was introduced to address the need for a regulatory framework that aligns with international standards while ensuring the safety of civil aviation within Australia. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is the body responsible for enforcing these regulations, which are designed to maintain the safety and airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products. The policy objective of the CASR 1998 is to provide a robust regulatory framework that ensures the safety of air navigation, protects public health and safety, and minimises the regulatory burden on aviation stakeholders. This is achieved through the issuance of airworthiness directives, which are binding orders that mandate compliance with safety standards.
Scope and Application
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended, apply to various entities and individuals within the aviation industry in Australia, encompassing all aspects of civil aviation safety, including airworthiness of aircraft and aeronautical products. The scope of these regulations is expansive, covering all aircraft registered in Australia and all aeronautical products used in Australian aviation, as well as the operations and maintenance carried out by licensed aviation professionals and entities. The regulations are designed to ensure the safety of air navigation and the continuing airworthiness of aircraft, and they apply to the Commonwealth of Australia and its territories, in alignment with international standards set by the International Civil Aviation Organization. Notably, these regulations extend their reach through subordinate instruments that provide detailed specifications and operational standards. Certain exclusions and exemptions may apply based on specific circumstances or types of aircraft, but these are narrowly defined and subject to stringent safety assessments. The revocation of specific Airworthiness Directives, as outlined in CASA ADCX 004/13, is an example of how these regulations are adapted to maintain safety without unnecessary regulatory burden.
Key Provisions
The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998), as amended by CASA ADCX 004/13, primarily address the revocation of two airworthiness directives (ADs) that have been superseded by more recent directives from other authorities. Specifically, AD/TBM 700/19 Amdt 1, issued by CASA, has been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0035, while AD/DHC-8/135, also issued by CASA, has been superseded by Transport Canada AD CF-2007-32R1. These revocations reflect the supersession of the original requirements by the more recent and relevant directives from the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and Transport Canada.
The obligations imposed by this regulation include the necessity for CASA, as Australia's national airworthiness authority, to ensure that the ADs it issues are current and reflect the latest safety standards. The regulation mandates that CASA must accept and enforce ADs issued by the State of Design for aircraft types on the Australian Register. When newer, more comprehensive ADs are issued by other recognised authorities, CASA is required to revoke the outdated ADs to prevent confusion and ensure compliance with the most current safety requirements.
Breach of the obligations outlined in the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 can lead to civil and criminal consequences. Specifically, non-compliance with airworthiness directives can result in significant penalties. For corporations, the maximum penalty for each breach can be up to 500,000 Australian dollars, while individuals can face penalties of up to 55,000 Australian dollars. These penalties underscore the importance of adhering to the regulations to ensure the safety and airworthiness of aircraft operating within Australian airspace.
Additionally, the revocation of these ADs aims to reduce regulatory burdens and streamline compliance processes for aviation stakeholders. By revoking outdated directives that have been superseded by newer, more comprehensive ones, the regulation seeks to enhance efficiency and ensure that all safety-related requirements are up-to-date and based on the latest standards. The compatibility statement with human rights further assures that these changes do not infringe upon any recognised rights or freedoms, aligning with international human rights instruments.