CASA ADCX 002/13 - Revocation of Airworthiness Directives

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L00106 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

 

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

 

CASA ADCX 002/13 - Revocation of Airworthiness Directives

 

Legislation

Under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act), the Governor-General may make regulations for the purposes of the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.  Under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, CASA may issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for kinds of aircraft or aeronautical products.  Under the previous subregulation 39.001(5) of CASR 1998, an AD was a legislative instrument.  This is still the situation under subsection 98(5B) of the Act.

Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design has overall responsibility for continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type, and must provide any information necessary to ensure the continuing airworthiness of a type to appropriate States of Registry.  ADs (and their equivalents) are the most common form of continuing airworthiness information, and are issued by most ICAO Contracting States.

The State of Registry of an individual aircraft is responsible for its continuing airworthiness.  Under Annex 8, the State of Registry must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft.  When a State of Design issues an AD against a type of aircraft on the Australian Register, CASA, as Australia’s national airworthiness authority, must accept that AD.  State of Design ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are defined as ADs per Civil Aviation Safety Regulations Part 39.001A.

AD/A330/81

 

A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A.  The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0016 issued on
16 January 2013.

 

AD/BO 105/16 Amdt 1

 

A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A.  The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0015 issued on
16 January 2013.

 

AD/BO 105/21

 

A State of Design airworthiness directive issued on or after 1 October 2009 is defined as an airworthiness directive per CASR Part 39.001A.  The requirements of this airworthiness directive have been superseded by EASA AD 2013-0015 issued on
16 January 2013.


Consultation

No consultation with the Australian public has taken place on this AD cancellation, because the cancellation results in a reduction of the regulatory burden.

 

The Office of Best Practice Regulation has determined that ADs do not require a Regulatory Impact Statement.

 

Compatibility with human rights and freedoms

This instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Human Rights Implications

The instrument sets out technical requirements as detailed above.  The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights and freedoms.

 

This AD cancellation has been made by the Manager, Continuing Airworthiness in the Airworthiness and Engineering Branch, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 94 (1) of the Act.

[Instrument number CASA ADCX 002/13]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted to provide comprehensive regulations governing the safety and efficiency of civil aviation in Australia, in line with the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The legislation empowers the Governor-General to create regulations that promote the safety of air navigation, and under regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) is authorised to issue airworthiness directives (ADs) for specific aircraft types or aeronautical products. The 1988 Regulations aim to ensure that all aviation operations within Australian jurisdiction adhere to stringent safety standards, thereby safeguarding the public and maintaining the integrity of the national airspace. The policy objective is to harmonise Australian civil aviation practices with international standards and to ensure the highest level of safety and efficiency in the aviation sector.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended, pertain to the regulation of airworthiness directives (ADs) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. These regulations apply to any aircraft registered in Australia and the operators of such aircraft, ensuring compliance with air safety standards. The scope of these regulations extends to all aircraft types and aeronautical products, governed by both Australian and international standards as stipulated in Annex 8 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation. The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 further detail the process by which CASA issues ADs to maintain airworthiness. Notably, the ADs issued on or after 1 October 2009 are specifically defined in CASR Part 39.001A. While these regulations are primarily national in scope, they also align with international obligations, requiring the acceptance of ADs issued by the State of Design. The revocation of certain ADs, as outlined in CASA ADCX 002/13, reflects the dynamic nature of regulatory requirements and the adaptation to newer, more stringent standards, such as those issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). This revocation does not require public consultation or a Regulatory Impact Statement, as it reduces the regulatory burden without compromising safety standards.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by the revocation of certain Airworthiness Directives (ADs) in CASA ADCX 002/13, address the ongoing airworthiness of aircraft registered in Australia. These regulations, under section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, enable the Governor-General to make regulations that ensure the safety of air navigation (section 98). Specifically, regulation 39.001 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue airworthiness directives for specific types of aircraft or aeronautical products. The ADs that were previously issued under subregulation 39.001(5) of CASR 1998 and are now superseded under subsection 98(5B) of the Act, continue to be considered legislative instruments. The ADs listed in the document, which pertain to certain aircraft types such as the A330 and BO 105, have been revoked due to the issuance of equivalent directives by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) that meet or exceed the safety standards originally set by the Australian ADs. The obligations imposed by these regulations on the relevant parties, primarily CASA and aircraft operators, include the acceptance and implementation of the ADs issued by the State of Design. Under Annex 8 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the State of Design is responsible for the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft type and must provide necessary information to ensure that the type remains airworthy. The State of Registry, which in this case is Australia, must develop or adopt requirements to ensure the continuing airworthiness of aircraft registered within its jurisdiction. When an AD is issued by the State of Design against an aircraft type on the Australian Register, CASA must accept and enforce that AD. The revocation of certain ADs, as detailed in CASA ADCX 002/13, reflects CASA's acceptance of equivalent or superior directives issued by EASA. The revocation of these ADs does not introduce new offences or penalties; however, non-compliance with airworthiness directives, whether the original ADs or the newer ones issued by EASA, could lead to enforcement actions. Failure to adhere to the requirements of an AD can result in serious safety risks and potential legal consequences for aircraft operators. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA has the authority to take enforcement action against non-compliance, which may include fines or other penalties as prescribed by the regulations. The specific maximum penalties for breaches of airworthiness directives are not detailed in the revocation instrument but are generally outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations and can include substantial fines and, in severe cases, criminal charges against individuals or corporations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.