CASA 880/99 - Direction under subregulation 196(3)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2005B02746 In force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INSTRUMENT NUMBER:  CASA 880/99

 

CIVIL AVIATION ACT 1988

 

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS 1988

 

DIRECTION UNDER SUBREGULATION 196(3)

 

 

I, Richard Godfrey Yates, Assistant Director, Aviation Safety Standards, CASA, a delegate of CASA, under subregulation 196 (3) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, direct that an aeroplane having Australian nationality does not have to display the anti-collision light described in that subregulation if it displays a flashing white strobe light visible at any time in all directions within 30 degrees above and 30 degrees below the aeroplane’s horizontal plane.

 

 

 

[Signed R.G. Yates]

 

 

Richard Yates

Assistant Director

Aviation Safety Standards

 

30 July 1999

Overview

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, was introduced to consolidate and modernise the legal framework governing civil aviation in the country. This legislation aimed to address the need for a comprehensive, up-to-date regulatory structure to ensure safety and efficiency in the aviation industry. One of its objectives is to provide for a robust regime that can adapt to the evolving nature of civil aviation while maintaining high standards of safety and security. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 further elaborate on the provisions of the Act, offering detailed guidelines and standards that must be adhered to by all aviation stakeholders. The regulations aim to achieve consistent and effective regulation of civil aviation activities across Australia.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Act 1988, as supplemented by the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, governs the regulation and oversight of civil aviation activities in Australia. This legislation applies to various entities, including aircraft operators, pilots, air traffic service providers, and other aviation stakeholders. It encompasses a broad spectrum of conduct and transactions related to civil aviation, ensuring the safety, efficiency, and orderly development of air navigation facilities and services. The jurisdiction of the Act is national, extending to all Commonwealth, state, and territory airspace. The regulatory reach of the Act is supplemented by subordinate instruments, including directions and regulations that may extend or restrict its application. For instance, the Direction under Subregulation 196(3) specifies that an aeroplane with Australian nationality is exempt from displaying the anti-collision light if it instead uses a flashing white strobe light visible from all directions within 30 degrees above and below the aeroplane’s horizontal plane. This direction illustrates how the Act’s application can be tailored through regulatory instruments to address specific safety and operational considerations.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of this legislative instrument are found in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically under subregulation 196(3). This subregulation allows for a deviation from the standard requirement for anti-collision lights on Australian-national aeroplanes. Instead of the mandatory anti-collision light, subregulation 196(3) permits the display of a flashing white strobe light, provided it is visible at all times in all directions within 30 degrees above and 30 degrees below the aeroplane’s horizontal plane. This is a notable exception to the usual regulatory requirements, providing flexibility in meeting the necessary aviation safety standards. The obligations imposed by this legislation primarily concern the operators and owners of Australian-national aeroplanes. They are required to ensure that any aeroplane under their control complies with the stipulated lighting conditions. This means that if an aeroplane is equipped with a flashing white strobe light that meets the specified visibility criteria, it can forego the installation of the standard anti-collision light. However, this flexibility comes with a responsibility to maintain the strobe light in good working order and ensure it is visible under all operational conditions. The ultimate goal is to maintain safety standards while providing operational flexibility. The consequences for non-compliance with the regulations, as outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, are significant. If an aeroplane operator fails to adhere to the specified lighting requirements, they could face civil penalties. The maximum penalty for non-compliance with these regulations can be substantial, reflecting the importance of adhering to safety standards. In addition to financial penalties, non-compliance may also result in operational restrictions or the grounding of the aircraft until the required standards are met, thereby impacting the operator’s business and safety protocols. In summary, the legislative instrument under discussion allows Australian-national aeroplanes to display a flashing white strobe light in lieu of a standard anti-collision light, provided it meets specific visibility criteria. This flexibility is balanced by stringent obligations on operators to ensure compliance and maintain the required lighting standards. Non-compliance carries significant penalties, including financial and operational consequences, underscoring the importance of adhering to these regulations to ensure aviation safety.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.