CASA 81/18 — Number of Cabin Attendants (Network Aviation) Direction 2018

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2018L01651 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

CASA 81/18 — Number of Cabin Attendants (Network Aviation) Direction 2018

Purpose

The direction enables Network Aviation Pty Ltd (Network Aviation) to operate relevant aircraft with 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number, subject to required risk reduction measures.

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and for the safety of air navigation. Relevantly, the GovernorGeneral has made the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR).

Under regulation 208 of CAR, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may give directions relating to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft, having regard to the safety of air navigation.

Subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 was made under regulation 208 of CAR and provides that aircraft carrying more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers shall carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or bylaws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

Background

The standard in subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3 is a unique Australian requirement that is more onerous than the cabin attendant ratio required elsewhere in the world. The ratio permitted in Europe, the USA and most other countries is for an airline to provide 1 cabin attendant for every 50 seats on the aircraft or part of that number. CASA permits operators to use the internationally-accepted ratio in certain circumstances, assessed on a casebycase basis.

Instrument

By directing that Network Aviation can operate relevant aircraft with a cabin attendant to passenger seat ratio of 1:50, the instrument allows Network Aviation to operate Airbus A320 series aircraft with 4 cabin attendants.

The instrument also directs Network Aviation to give CASA 14 days written notice before revising any part of its operations manual relating to emergency procedures for relevant aircraft. That direction ensures that CASA maintains visibility of appropriate risk reduction measures in Network Aviation’s operations manual, enforceable under CAR. 

Legislation Act 2003 (the LA)

The instrument is being registered as a legislative instrument and is, therefore, a legislative instrument in accordance with subsection 8 (3) of the LA, and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LA.

Consultation

Initial consultation under section 17 of the LA was undertaken following the issue of the CASA report that recommended the recognition of the US Federal Aviation Administration and EASA certification standards in relation to setting the ratio of cabin attendants to passenger seats.

The instrument has been issued at the request of Network Aviation, and is similar to instruments issued to other operators that appear to be accepted by industry. In those circumstances, CASA is satisfied that, for section 17 of the LA, no further consultation is appropriate or reasonably practicable for the instrument.

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) is not required in this case as the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for directions (OBPR id: 14507).

Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances concerns

The instrument provides for Network Aviation to meet a standard for cabin attendant numbers that differs from the standard currently set down in CAO 20.16.3, but is considered to be a standard consistent with international safety standards and practice.

The development and preparation of suitable standards with appropriate conditions is continuing in conjunction with the preparation of new regulations applicable to all air transport operators.

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

The Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights at Attachment 1 has been prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011. The instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms, and is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

The instrument commences on 1 December 2018 and will be repealed at the end of 30 November 2020.

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

CASA 81/18 — Number of Cabin Attendants (Network Aviation) Direction 2018

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument allows Network Aviation Pty Ltd to operate designated aircraft with 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number.

 

Human rights implications

The legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

The legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The CASA 81/18 – Number of Cabin Attendants (Network Aviation) Direction 2018 was enacted to enable Network Aviation Pty Ltd to operate certain aircraft with a cabin attendant to passenger seat ratio of 1:50, in line with international safety standards. This direction was introduced to address the unique Australian requirement that had been more stringent than global practices, requiring a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number for aircraft carrying between 36 and 216 passengers. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has the authority to issue such directions under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, which allows for variations in crew requirements for aircraft safety. This direction is also in accordance with the Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislation Act 2003. The policy objective is to ensure that Network Aviation can comply with internationally recognised safety standards while maintaining the safety of air navigation. The instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues, as stated in the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights.

Scope and Application

The CASA 81/18 — Number of Cabin Attendants (Network Aviation) Direction 2018 pertains specifically to Network Aviation Pty Ltd, allowing the company to operate certain aircraft with a cabin attendant to passenger seat ratio of 1:50, which is consistent with international safety standards and practices. This direction, issued under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowers Network Aviation to operate Airbus A320 series aircraft with four cabin attendants instead of adhering to the more stringent Australian requirement of a 1:36 ratio for aircraft carrying between 37 and 216 passengers. The direction is in line with the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and Civil Aviation Orders, ensuring that Network Aviation implements necessary risk reduction measures. Furthermore, the direction mandates that Network Aviation provides CASA with 14 days' written notice before modifying any part of its operations manual concerning emergency procedures for the specified aircraft, thereby ensuring CASA's oversight of these critical safety measures. The instrument is subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament and is registered as a legislative instrument under the Legislation Act 2003. It was made in response to Network Aviation's request and aligns with ongoing efforts to harmonise Australian standards with international norms.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR) and the associated Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 establish the requirements for cabin attendants on aircraft. These regulations typically require a cabin attendant for every 36 passengers or part of that number for aircraft carrying more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers. However, the CASA 81/18 Direction 2018 allows Network Aviation Pty Ltd to deviate from this standard for certain aircraft, permitting them to operate with a cabin attendant for every 50 passengers or part of that number, subject to specific risk reduction measures (section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and regulation 208 of CAR). Network Aviation is obligated to implement the risk reduction measures stipulated by CASA to ensure safety standards are maintained. These measures are designed to mitigate any safety risks associated with the reduced number of cabin attendants. Additionally, Network Aviation must notify CASA 14 days prior to making any changes to their operations manual that pertain to emergency procedures for the relevant aircraft. This requirement ensures CASA remains informed about any changes that could affect safety, thereby allowing them to enforce compliance with CAR (CAO 20.16.3, subparagraph 6.1(b)). Failure to comply with the provisions of the Direction or the mandated risk reduction measures may result in regulatory action. Potential consequences include fines, penalties, or other enforcement actions under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed in the Direction but would be consistent with those applicable under the Act, which can include substantial financial penalties and other legal repercussions depending on the severity and nature of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.