CASA 518/09 – Direction – number of cabin attendants

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2009L04115 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants

Legislation
Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. Subsection 7 and subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3 (CAO 20.16.3) were made under regulation 208 and provide, among other things, that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

CAO 20.16.3 has remained in the same form since 1960 and as such represents a 49 year gap since a reassessment of cabin attendant numbers against a criterion of allowable seating rather than passenger numbers. CASA in a report, Review of policies and practices for first-of-type certification of imported aircraft, recommended the recognition of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America (the FAA) certification standards and the Joint Aviation Authorities (Europe), now European Aviation Safety Agency, standards. The recommendation was adopted.

The Fokker F28 MK 0100 certification of the aircraft relates to the design of the floor plan and the seating configuration in relation to the location of exits. CASA does not call for a reevaluation of the aircraft design; instead, CASA accepts the design criterion. CASA does require operators to demonstrate the safety procedures that are specific to the operator, which are evaluated, thus there is a distinction between the certification criterion and an operatorimposed safety procedure which may, or may not, enhance the evacuation of the aircraft in an emergency evacuation. Fokker Services Technical Services undertook an analysis of the certification processes which demonstrated that a 2 cabin crew member operation with up to 100 passengers was in full compliance with the applicable design and operational requirements of Joint Aviation Authorities (Europe), now European Aviation Safety Agency.

CASA is satisfied that the evacuation of a full complement of passengers for the Fokker F28 MK 0100 is able to be achieved in a time of 90 seconds. CASA is satisfied that the evacuation procedures adopted by the operator to support their application to operate with the certification criterion of 2 cabin attendants have been demonstrated successfully. The maximum permitted time of 90 seconds is set out as a condition in Schedule 1 of the instrument.

CASA does not consider that safety would be compromised if a Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft carried cabin attendants during operations with a complement of 1 cabin attendant to 50 seats, or part of that number, fitted to the aircraft.

The conditions include a requirement that the briefing of passengers in self-help exit rows must be as approved by CASA and in the manner set out in the operator’s operations manual, as well as the requirement that the evacuation must be completed in not more than 90 seconds.

The conditions state that the number of able-bodied persons available to occupy seats in the self-help exit rows must be determined only after the weight and balance requirements applicable to the loading of the aircraft have been complied with.

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a Civil Aviation Order (CAO), and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (a) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation

Consultation has not been undertaken because the instrument remakes CASA 427/09 which ceases to have effect at the end of 31 August 2011. The remake is to correct a minor error in the description of the aircraft by removing the reference FK series” in the aircraft description.  CASA had consulted on the making of the previous instrument.

Senate Regulations and Ordinances Committee concerns

This Direction provides for the particular operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3 but it is considered to be a safe standard, consistent with international safety standards and practice.

The direction is the latest of a small number of such instruments issued to, or renewed for, several operators pending CASA’s development of considered amendments to bring CAO 20.16.3 into line with new internationally recognised standards for cabin crew ratios (at least 1 cabin crew attendant for every 50 passenger seats, and 1 attendant for any incomplete part of that number).

The development and preparation of suitable CAO amendments is a more intensive and involved process than the evaluation and consideration of directions for a particular named operator. While such evaluation and consideration for an individual operator is itself detailed, and guided by the requirements of safety and prudence, it has not required extensive consultation with the broader industry.

However, the Senate Standing Committee on Regulations and Ordinances has commented on the absence of broader industry consultation for the particular measures. As a result, CASA has accelerated the creation of a joint CASA/industry Cabin Crew Ratio Project Team (CCRPT) with a view to extensive industry consultation on proposals to amend CAO 20.16.3 in relation to cabin crew ratios.

The CCRPT had its first meeting on 10 June 2009, attended by representatives of the industry most likely to be affected by changes to the current cabin crew standard, including, the Australian and International Airline Pilots Association (AIPA), the Flight Attendants Association of Australia (FAAA), Qantas Airways Limited, QantasLink, Virgin Blue Airlines Pty Ltd, National Jet Systems Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Airline Services, and Skywest Airlines Pty Ltd. The project teams also include a CASA expert on the subject of cabin crew ratios.

Work and discussions are underway with a view to the production of a draft Civil Aviation Advisory Publication (CAAP), CAO drafting instructions and public Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM). Proposed application of the 1:50 international standard for charter and regular public transport operations generally gives rise to the need to consider various safety-related matters and this is currently underway through the joint project team.

When finalised and registered, the CAO amendments would contain new standard and relevant conditions. These would remove the current need to issue, if appropriate, directions requested by individual operators for their particular operations.

However, pending the finalisation of the project team’s work on the CAO, it is essentially unavoidable that CASA will issue or renew a small number of individual directions to operators on the same basis as has previously been done.

The instrument commences on the day after it is registered and stops having effect at the end of 31 August 2011.

The Direction has been issued by a delegate of CASA under subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.

[Instrument number CASA 518/09]

Overview

The Civil Aviation (Cabin Attendants) Direction 2009 (F2009L04115) was introduced to address a long-standing issue with the cabin attendant requirements for specific aircraft types, particularly the Fokker F28 MK 0100. Enacted under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, the Direction aims to ensure the safety of air navigation by allowing the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to provide specific operational directions. The Direction is a legislative instrument subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and it was issued by CASA to meet an immediate safety requirement for a particular aircraft model, pending broader industry consultation and potential amendments to the Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3. The policy objective is to align with internationally recognised standards for cabin crew ratios while maintaining stringent safety protocols. CASA's decision to issue this Direction was influenced by a recommendation to adopt international certification standards from the Federal Aviation Administration and the European Aviation Safety Agency. The Direction allows for a reduced cabin crew requirement for the Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, provided specific safety conditions are met, including passenger briefing and emergency evacuation procedures. This approach is a temporary measure until broader industry consultation and potential amendments to the Civil Aviation Order are finalised. The Direction commences on the day after its registration and ceases to have effect at the end of 31 August 2011, reflecting CASA's commitment to safety and compliance with international standards.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by this instrument, apply to the specific operations of the Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft operated by a particular airline. This Act mandates the safety standards for air navigation and allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions concerning the operating crew, including cabin attendants, based on safety considerations. The regulation is tailored to the operational needs of the specified aircraft and ensures compliance with international safety standards. The geographic reach of this legislation is national, encompassing all operations within Australia. The Act does not specify exclusions or exemptions but relies on the operational specifics of the aircraft and the conditions set forth in the direction. The application of the Act may be extended or restricted through subordinate instruments, such as Civil Aviation Orders, which are subject to parliamentary disallowance processes.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically subsection 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empower the Governor-General to create regulations in the interest of air navigation safety. Regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 allows CASA to issue directions concerning the operating crew required on an aircraft, considering safety factors. Under Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3, aircraft carrying between 37 and 216 passengers must have a cabin attendant for every 36 passengers or part thereof. The current standards have remained unchanged since 1960, prompting CASA to reassess cabin attendant numbers against allowable seating criteria instead of passenger numbers. CASA has recommended adopting Federal Aviation Administration and European Aviation Safety Agency standards, which led to the certification of the Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, confirming that two cabin crew members can safely operate the aircraft with up to 100 passengers, adhering to applicable design and operational requirements. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties involved. Operators must ensure that passengers in self-help exit rows are briefed in a manner approved by CASA and outlined in the operator’s operations manual. They must also guarantee that the evacuation of passengers is completed within 90 seconds. The number of able-bodied persons in self-help exit rows must be determined after complying with the weight and balance requirements for aircraft loading. Additionally, CASA’s direction affects subparagraph 6.1(a) of CAO 20.16.3 and is subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act and the regulations can lead to various consequences. Operators who do not adhere to the prescribed safety procedures or fail to ensure timely evacuations can face penalties. The maximum penalties for breaches are not explicitly stated in the text, but the seriousness of non-compliance suggests potential fines or other legal actions under civil or criminal law. CASA’s directions are essential to maintain safety standards, and non-compliance can result in the revocation of operational permits or other regulatory sanctions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Safety Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.