CASA 48/17 - Repeal of authorisation and permission — helicopter winching operations

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2017L00647 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Repeal of authorisation and permission — helicopter winching operations

 

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under subregulation 151 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR), it is an offence for the pilot in command of an aircraft to allow persons or objects to be picked up by the aircraft. However, under subregulation 151 (3), it is a defence if CASA gives prior written authority and conditions mentioned in the authority are complied with.

 

Under paragraphs 250 (1) (c) and 250 (1A) (c) of CAR, it is an offence for the operator or the pilot in command to permit a person to be carried on anything attached to the aircraft. However, under subregulation 250 (2), CASA may give permission for a person to be carried in this way, subject to compliance with conditions specified under subregulation 250 (3).

 

These provisions have the effect of preventing helicopter winching operations. However, by means of Civil Aviation Order 29.11 (CAO 29.11), CASA has given authority and permission under subregulations 151 (3) and 250 (2) of CAR, therefore, allowing helicopters to conduct winching operations, subject to various conditions mentioned in CAO 29.11.

 

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

 

Background

From time to time, helicopters malfunction or require maintenance while servicing sites with helidecks. Helicopter winching to land and take off maintenance personnel and spares may be required. Most helidecks would not comply with the dimensional requirements for an operating area in paragraph 5.1 of CAO 29.11. Also, the operation may not comply with the helicopter performance requirements of paragraph 7.1 of CAO 29.11.

 

By instrument CASA 33/16, CASA granted Bond Helicopters Australia Pty Ltd (the operator) an authority and permission under subregulations 151 (3) and 250 (2) of CAR to enable its helicopter pilots to winch maintenance personnel and spares to and from sites without compliance with paragraphs 5.1 and 7.1 of CAO 29.11, but subject to a series of safety conditions.

 

Instrument

This instrument repeals instrument CASA 33/16.

 

The operator has changed its name to Babcock Offshore Services Australasia Pty Ltd and has requested that the authorisations in CASA 33/16 be extended to an additional type of helicopter. A new non-legislative instrument, CASA EX61/17, has being issued to the operator for those purposes.

 

Consequently, CASA 33/16 is no longer required and is being repealed by this instrument.

 

Legislation Act 2003 (the LA)

Under subsection 8 (5) and paragraph 10 (1) (c) of the LA, an instrument is a legislative instrument if it includes a provision that repeals another legislative instrument. This instrument repeals CASA 33/16, which is a legislative instrument.

 

Therefore, this instrument is also a legislative instrument within the meaning of the LA, and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LA.

 

Consultation

The operator has requested a change to the authorisation in CASA 33/16. CASA has issued a new instrument in accordance with the operator’s request and CASA 33/16 is no longer required. In these circumstances, it is CASA’s view that it is not necessary or appropriate to undertake any further consultation under section 17 of the LA.

 

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because the instrument is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required for this type of instrument (OBPR id: 14507).

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

The instrument commences on the day after registration. Under section 48A of the LA, it is repealed on the day after registration.

 

[Instrument number CASA 48/17]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Repeal of authorisation and permission — helicopter winching operations

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument repeals instrument CASA 33/16, which enabled the conduct of certain helicopter winching operations conducted by Bond Helicopters Australia Pty Ltd (now known as Babcock Offshore Services Australasia Pty Ltd). The instrument allowed maintenance personnel and equipment to be winched by helicopter on or off an offshore platform or vessel, subject to conditions imposed by CASA in the interests of air safety.

 

The operator has changed its name and has requested that the authorisations in CASA 33/16 be extended to an additional type of helicopter. A new non-legislative instrument, CASA EX61/17, has being issued to the operator for those purposes.

 

Consequently, CASA 33/16 is no longer required and is being repealed.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended, regulate helicopter winching operations in Australia under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988. These regulations were introduced to address safety concerns related to air navigation and the carrying of persons or objects by aircraft. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), established under the Civil Aviation Act, has the power to issue regulations and permissions for these operations, subject to compliance with specified conditions. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 originally prohibited such operations but allowed for exceptions under CASA's authority. In 2016, CASA issued instrument CASA 33/16 to Bond Helicopters Australia Pty Ltd (now Babcock Offshore Services Australasia Pty Ltd) to permit specific winching operations with certain safety conditions. Given changes in the operator's circumstances, CASA has issued a new instrument, CASA EX61/17, rendering CASA 33/16 obsolete. Consequently, CASA 33/16 is repealed by this new legislative instrument, which is subject to tabling and disallowance under the Legislation Act 2003. The repeal does not necessitate further consultation or a Regulation Impact Statement, as it is covered by a standing agreement between CASA and the Office of Best Practice Regulation. The instrument is also compatible with human rights as it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by instrument CASA 48/17, concern the repeal of authorisation and permission for helicopter winching operations. This legislation applies to the operator, in this instance Babcock Offshore Services Australasia Pty Ltd, previously known as Bond Helicopters Australia Pty Ltd, and its pilots who are involved in winching operations using helicopters. The geographic scope of this regulation is national, as it pertains to the safety of air navigation within Australia. The repeal of instrument CASA 33/16, which previously allowed specific winching operations under certain conditions, is a legislative action taken under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Acts Interpretation Act 1901. The instrument also extends to the issuance of a new non-legislative instrument, CASA EX61/17, to accommodate the operator's request for extending authorisations to an additional type of helicopter. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds in this particular repeal; however, the operations remain subject to the conditions specified by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to ensure air safety. Further, the instrument complies with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues, as evidenced by the Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights. The instrument was made by a delegate of CASA under the authority of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 and comes into effect on the day after registration, with its repeal also scheduled for the day after registration.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR) contain several key provisions that govern the safety of air navigation in Australia. Under subregulation 151(1) of the CAR, it is an offence for the pilot in command of an aircraft to allow persons or objects to be picked up by the aircraft. However, subregulation 151(3) provides a defence if the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) grants prior written authority and the conditions mentioned in the authority are complied with. Similarly, under paragraphs 250(1)(c) and 250(1A)(c) of the CAR, it is an offence for the operator or the pilot in command to permit a person to be carried on anything attached to the aircraft. However, subregulation 250(2) allows CASA to give permission for a person to be carried in this way, subject to compliance with conditions specified under subregulation 250(3). These provisions effectively prevent helicopter winching operations, but Civil Aviation Order 29.11 (CAO 29.11) allows for such operations under certain conditions. CASA has previously granted Bond Helicopters Australia Pty Ltd (now known as Babcock Offshore Services Australasia Pty Ltd) authority and permission under subregulations 151(3) and 250(2) of the CAR, enabling its helicopter pilots to winch maintenance personnel and spares to and from sites, subject to a series of safety conditions. This was done through instrument CASA 33/16. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act and the CAR on the parties it governs include strict adherence to the conditions set by CASA for helicopter winching operations. Any deviation from these conditions can result in serious consequences. The Act and the CAR mandate that any helicopter winching operations must be conducted in a manner that ensures the safety of air navigation, and any authorisations or permissions granted by CASA must be strictly followed. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act and the CAR can result in civil or criminal consequences. Under the CAR, the pilot in command of an aircraft who allows persons or objects to be picked up by the aircraft without the necessary authority from CASA can face penalties. Similarly, operators or pilots who permit a person to be carried on anything attached to the aircraft without the required permission can also face penalties. The maximum penalties for these offences are not specified in the explanatory statement but can be found in the relevant sections of the CAR. Additionally, CASA has the authority to revoke any authorisations or permissions granted if the conditions are not met, which can further lead to legal repercussions for the operators. In summary, the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and related instruments provide a framework for ensuring the safety of air navigation, including specific provisions that allow for helicopter winching operations under certain conditions. The obligations on the parties involved are clear and strict, and any breaches can result in significant legal consequences. The repeal of instrument CASA 33/16 and the issuance of a new instrument, CASA EX61/17, reflect changes in the operational requirements and ensure that safety remains the paramount concern in all helicopter winching operations.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Regulatory Standards
Prohibited Conduct
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.