CASA 46/19 — Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2019L01003 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

CASA 46/19 Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019

Purpose

The purpose of CASA 46/19 — Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019 (the instrument) is to repeal instrument CASA 44/19 — Temporary Prohibition of Operations (GippsAero GA8 Airvan) Direction 2019, that temporarily prohibited the operation of GippsAero GA8 and GA8-TC 320 aircraft in Australian territory and, if Australian-registered, overseas.

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Relevantly, the Governor-General has made the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) and Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR).

 

Subpart 11.G of CASR provides for the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions in relation to matters affecting the safety of air navigation. Under paragraph 11.245 (1) (a) of CASR, for subsection 98 (5A) of the Act, CASA may, by instrument, issue a direction about any matter affecting the safe navigation and operation of aircraft. Subregulation 11.245 (2) of CASR provides that CASA may issue such a direction if CASA is satisfied that it is necessary to do so in the interests of the safety of air navigation, if the direction is not inconsistent with the Act, and for the purposes of CASA’s functions.

 

Under paragraph 11.250 (a) of CASR, a direction under regulation 11.245 ceases to be in force on the day specified in the direction. Under regulation 11.255 it is an offence of strict liability for a person to contravene a direction under regulation 11.245.

 

Subsection 26 (2) of the Act, read with section 14 of the Air Navigation Act 1920 (ANA), has effect to permit a person to operate a foreign registered aircraft into Australia, and land in Australia, in a non-scheduled flight. However, in giving effect to the Convention on International Civil Aviation (Chicago Convention), section 14 of the ANA is subject to clause 9 (b) of the Chicago Convention which preserves for contracting States the right to temporarily prohibit flying over its territory, provided that the prohibition applies without restriction to aircraft of all States.

 

Under subsection 33 (3) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (the AIA), where an Act confers a power to make, grant or issue any instrument of a legislative or administrative character (including rules, regulations or by-laws), the power shall be construed as including a power exercisable in the like manner and subject to the like conditions (if any) to repeal, rescind, revoke, amend, or vary any such instrument.

 

Background

The GA8 Airvan aircraft is manufactured in Australia by GippsAero Pty Ltd at Latrobe Valley Airport in Victoria. The aircraft and its variants have been type certificated by CASA under Part 21 of CASR.

 

On 14 July 2019, a GA8-TC 320 aircraft being operated in parachuting operations lost control and impacted terrain near Umea in Sweden. The aircraft was destroyed and the 9 occupants were all fatally injured.

 

In the wake of the accident, Swedish aviation authorities, with assistance from the aviation authorities of other countries including Australia, commenced to investigate the causes of the accident.

 

Based on their initial enquiries, the Swedish aviation authorities were sufficiently concerned about the possible causes of the accident to suspend operations of the GA8 Airvan aircraft in Swedish airspace.

 

In order to understand the nature of the concerns which led to this decision, and to safeguard the interests of air safety in the meantime, CASA issued instrument CASA 44/19 — Temporary Prohibition of Operations (GippsAero GA8 Airvan) Direction 2019). Instrument CASA 44/19 directed the suspension of all operations by persons of GA8 Airvan aircraft within Australian territory or, if Australian registered, outside Australian territory, for a period of 15 days as a precaution.

 

CASA has now received further information that there is no evidence to presently indicate a potential unsafe condition associated with the aircraft. Accordingly, CASA has determined that instrument CASA 44/19, that imposed the prohibition on operation of the GA8 Airvan aircraft, be repealed.

 

Overview of instrument

The instrument repeals instrument CASA 44/19 — Temporary Prohibition of Operations (GippsAero GA8 Airvan) Direction 2019.

 

CASA has assessed the impact the instrument will have on aviation safety and is satisfied that Instrument CASA 44/19 is no longer necessary in the interests of safety of air navigation.

 

Content of instrument

The instrument repeals instrument CASA 44/19.

 

Legislation Act 2003 (the LA)

Under paragraph 10 (1) (d) of the LA, an instrument is a legislative instrument if it includes a provision that amends or repeals another legislative instrument. This instrument repeals instrument CASA 44/19, which is a legislative instrument. Therefore, this instrument is also a legislative instrument, subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LA.

 

Consultation

CASA considers that instrument CASA 44/19 is no longer necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Accordingly, CASA is satisfied that no consultation is appropriate or reasonably practicable for the instrument for section 17 of the LA.

Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR)

A Regulation Impact Statement (RIS) is not required because this instrument is covered by standing agreements between CASA and OBPR under which a RIS is not required (OBPR id: 24429, 14507).

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

The instrument is compatible with human rights. A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by the Acting Director of Aviation Safety, on behalf of CASA, in accordance with subsection 73 (2) of the Act.

 

The instrument commenced at the time it was registered, and is automatically repealed in accordance with section 48A of the LA.

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

CASA 46/19 Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms
recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The purpose of this legislative instrument is to repeal instrument CASA 44/19 — Temporary Prohibition of Operations (GippsAero GA8 Airvan) Direction 2019.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument promotes the right to work, as it lifts the prohibition on GA8 Airvan aircraft being operated in Australian territory that had the effect of preventing Australians working on or in such aircraft, whether as crew members or ground crew.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights because it promotes the protection of human rights.

 

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 were enacted to establish and maintain a robust framework for the safety of air navigation in Australia. The regulations empower the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions and instruments to ensure that the operation of aircraft does not compromise safety. The 2019 instrument CASA 46/19 — Repeal of CASA 44/19, introduced by CASA, was developed to address a temporary safety concern raised after a fatal accident involving a GippsAero GA8 Airvan aircraft in Sweden. The original instrument CASA 44/19 had temporarily prohibited the operation of GA8 and GA8-TC 320 aircraft in Australian territory and overseas if Australian-registered. Following further investigation and assessment by CASA, it was determined that the prohibition was no longer necessary to maintain the safety of air navigation. The repealing instrument CASA 46/19 was enacted under the authority provided by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and complies with the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, ensuring that the regulatory framework remains responsive and adaptive to emerging safety issues. The repeal reflects CASA’s commitment to ensuring that the aviation safety regulations are based on the most current and reliable safety information.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998, as amended by CASA 46/19 — Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019, apply to all persons and entities involved in the operation of GippsAero GA8 and GA8-TC 320 aircraft within Australian territory and, if Australian-registered, overseas. This repeal specifically targets the temporary prohibition imposed on these aircraft in the aftermath of a fatal accident in Sweden. The instrument applies nationally across Australia and is designed to ensure the safety of air navigation as mandated by the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998. The repeal is executed under the authority conferred by section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowering the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation. This instrument effectively removes the temporary prohibition that had been issued under instrument CASA 44/19, allowing the resumption of operations for these aircraft types if safety concerns are no longer substantiated. The instrument does not exclude any particular entities or operations, but rather reinstates the status quo ante in terms of permissible operations of the specified aircraft, contingent upon compliance with existing safety regulations.

Key Provisions

The primary operative sections of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR) relevant to CASA 46/19 — Repeal of CASA 44/19 Instrument 2019, include paragraph 11.245(1)(a), which allows CASA to issue directions affecting the safe navigation and operation of aircraft. Subregulation 11.245(2) stipulates the conditions under which such directions can be issued, specifically if CASA is satisfied it is necessary in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Additionally, paragraph 11.250(a) of CASR states that a direction issued under regulation 11.245 ceases to be in force on the day specified in the direction. Regulation 11.255 imposes an offence of strict liability for contravening a direction under regulation 11.245. The obligations and requirements imposed by the Act and the CASR on the parties or entities it governs include the necessity for CASA to continuously monitor the safety of air navigation and issue appropriate directions as necessary. CASA must ensure that any directions issued are in the best interest of safety and are not inconsistent with the Act. Additionally, any person operating an aircraft in Australia, or an Australian-registered aircraft overseas, must comply with any directions issued by CASA. This includes adhering to the specified timeframes for the operation of aircraft, such as the 15-day prohibition on the operation of the GippsAero GA8 Airvan aircraft. The consequences for breach of any direction issued by CASA under the CASR include strict liability offences as per regulation 11.255. This means that the burden of proof does not rest on the prosecution to demonstrate intent or negligence; it is sufficient to prove that the contravention occurred. The maximum penalties for such offences are not explicitly stated in the text provided but would typically be outlined in the relevant legislation or subsidiary regulations. The penalties could range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the contravention and any precedents set by previous cases. Civil and criminal consequences may also apply, depending on the nature and extent of the breach.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations
Enforcement Powers

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.