CASA 372/11 – Direction – number of cabin attendants in Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2011L01761 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants in Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. Subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 was made under regulation 208 and provides that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

 

The requirements in subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3 have remained in the same form since 1960 and as such represents a 51 year gap since a reassessment of cabin attendant numbers against a criterion of allowable seating rather than passenger numbers. CASA in a report, Review of policies and practices for first-of-type certification of imported aircraft, recommended the recognition of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America certification standards and the Joint Aviation Authorities (Europe) (JAA), now European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), standards. The recommendation was adopted.

 

The Fokker F28 MK 0100 certification of the aircraft relates to the design of the floor plan and the seating configuration in relation to the location of exits. CASA does not call for a re-evaluation of the aircraft design; instead, CASA accepts the design criterion. CASA does require operators to demonstrate the safety procedures that are specific to the operator, which are evaluated, thus there is a distinction between the certification criterion and an operator-imposed safety procedure which may, or may not, enhance the evacuation of the aircraft in an emergency evacuation. Fokker Services Technical Services undertook an analysis of the certification processes which demonstrated that a 2 cabin crew member operation with up to 100 passengers was in full compliance with the applicable design and operational requirements of JAA, now EASA.

 

CASA is satisfied that the evacuation of a full complement of passengers for the Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft is able to be achieved in a time of 90 seconds. CASA is satisfied that the evacuation procedures adopted by Alliance Airlines Pty Ltd (the operator) to support their application to operate with the certification criterion of 2 cabin attendants have been demonstrated successfully. The maximum permitted time of 90 seconds is set out as a condition in Schedule 1 of the instrument.

 

CASA does not consider that safety would be compromised if a Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft carried cabin attendants during operations with a complement of 1 cabin attendant to 50 seats, or part of that number, fitted to the aircraft.

 

The other conditions include a requirement that the briefing of passengers in self-help exit rows must be as approved by CASA and in the manner set out in the operator’s operations manual.

 

There has been a change to the conditions in that 2 able-bodied passengers are required in each overwing exit row only when there are more than 10 passengers. This will facilitate the evacuation of the aircraft by allowing passengers to be seated towards the front of the aircraft where a cabin attendant and the main exit are located, as well as helping the loading of the aircraft so as to avoid a centre of gravity problem.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

Consultation has not been undertaken because the instrument renews CASA 518/09 which ceases to have effect at the end of 31 August 2011. Consultation was undertaken before CASA 427/09, the predecessor of CASA 518/09, was issued.

 

Senate Regulations and Ordinances Committee concerns

This direction provides for the particular operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3 but it is considered to be a safe standard, consistent with international safety standards and practice.

 

The direction is the latest of a number of such instruments issued to, or renewed for, several operators pending CASA’s development of considered amendments to bring CAO 20.16.3 into line with new internationally recognised standards for cabin crew ratios (at least 1 cabin crew attendant for every 50 passenger seats, and 1 attendant for any incomplete part of that number).

 

The development and preparation of suitable CAO amendments is a more intensive and involved process than the evaluation and consideration of directions for a particular named operator. While such evaluation and consideration for an individual operator is itself detailed, and guided by the requirements of safety and prudence, it has not required extensive consultation with the broader industry.

 

CASA has established a joint CASA/industry Cabin Crew Ratio Project Team (CCRPT) with a view to extensive industry consultation on proposals to amend CAO 20.16.3 in relation to cabin crew ratios.

 

Work and discussions are underway with a view to the production of a draft Civil Aviation Advisory Publication (CAAP), CAO drafting instructions and public Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM). Proposed application of the 1:50 international standard for charter and regular public transport operations generally gives rise to the need to consider various safety-related matters and this is currently underway through the CCRPT.

When finalised and registered, the CAO amendments would contain new standards and relevant conditions. These would remove the current need to issue, if appropriate, directions requested by individual operators for their particular operations.

 

However, pending the finalisation of the CCRPT’s work on the CAO, it is essentially unavoidable that CASA will issue or renew individual directions to operators on the same basis as has previously been done.

 

The instrument commences on 1 September 2011 and stops having effect at the end of 30 November 2011. The direction has been issued for a reduced period of approximately 3 months, pending creation of a general policy following the CCRPT discussions.

 

The direction has been issued by a delegate of CASA under regulation 11.260 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

[Instrument number CASA 372/11]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended, were enacted to regulate civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation. The Civil Aviation (Directions) Instrument 2011 (No. 1) amends these regulations by addressing a long-standing issue regarding the number of cabin attendants required for Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft. The regulation was introduced to align with international safety standards and practices, particularly those of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency. This change aims to ensure the safety of air navigation by implementing updated cabin crew standards, which have not been revised in over 50 years. The instrument was issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the authority granted by the Civil Aviation Act 1988, with the specific intent to provide a temporary measure until broader regulatory changes are finalised by CASA and industry stakeholders through the Cabin Crew Ratio Project Team. The instrument, being a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, requires tabling and disallowance in the Parliament. This direction, which affects the operation of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3, was issued to support the specific operations of an operator while broader industry consultations and policy developments are ongoing. The new standard for cabin crew numbers, which differs from the previous requirements, is considered safe and consistent with international safety standards. The instrument will remain in effect for a limited period until further amendments to the CAO are finalised and implemented.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 Direction, number of cabin attendants in Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, applies specifically to the operation of Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft within Australia. The direction is issued under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the safety of air navigation, and the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, which further delegate authority to the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions regarding operating crew requirements. This particular direction allows for a reduced number of cabin attendants on Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, aligning with international safety standards. The geographic reach of this legislation is limited to Australian airspace, as CASA is the national aviation safety regulator. While the direction sets specific standards for cabin crew ratios for Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, it does not explicitly exclude other aircraft types or operations, but rather provides a tailored solution for this specific aircraft model. The direction is issued as a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and thus, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament.

Key Provisions

The primary sections of the legislation are those that establish the requirement for a specific number of cabin attendants for Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft when carrying between 36 and 216 passengers. Section 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) authorises the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act, and under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) may issue directions regarding the operating crew required on an aircraft for safety purposes. Subparagraph 6.1(b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3, made under regulation 208, mandates that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number. The new direction under consideration modifies this requirement for Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, allowing for two cabin attendants to serve up to 100 passengers. The obligations imposed on the parties governed by this legislation include compliance with CASA's direction, which specifies that the Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft can operate with two cabin attendants for up to 100 passengers, provided that the operator has demonstrated to CASA's satisfaction that the safety procedures are adequate for such operations. Operators must also ensure that passengers in self-help exit rows are briefed in accordance with CASA-approved methods as detailed in the operator's operations manual. Additionally, when there are more than 10 passengers, two able-bodied passengers must be seated in each overwing exit row to facilitate evacuation. Breaching the conditions set out in the direction may result in various penalties and consequences. Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA), the instrument is subject to disallowance in the Parliament, which means that Parliament has the power to review and potentially reject the direction. Although specific penalties are not detailed in the legislation, non-compliance with CASA's direction could lead to enforcement actions, such as fines, operational restrictions, or other regulatory measures aimed at ensuring compliance with aviation safety standards. The consequences for failure to comply with the safety requirements could also include legal action by CASA or other regulatory bodies, potentially leading to civil or criminal liability for the operator.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Safety Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.