Explanatory Statement
Civil Aviation Regulations 1988
Permission and direction — helicopter operations by Northshore Holdings (NT) Pty Limited, trading as Remote Helicopters Australia
Legislation
Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) empowers the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.
Subregulation 250 (1) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that the operator of an aircraft and the pilot in command must not permit a person to be carried on the wings or undercarriage of the aircraft. Subregulation 250 (2) provides that a person may, with the permission of CASA given in respect of flights of a particular kind, be carried on, or in a part of, an aircraft that is not designed for the accommodation of the crew or passengers. Subregulation 250 (3) provides that CASA may, when granting a permission, specify conditions subject to which a person may be carried.
Subregulation 251 (1) of CAR 1988 provides that seat belts must be worn by all crew members and passengers in various circumstances, including when the aircraft is flying at less than 1 000 feet above the terrain. However, under subregulation 251 (9), CASA may direct that a seat belt need not be worn in this particular circumstance.
Subregulation 207 (2) of CAR 1988 provides that an Australian aircraft must not be used in any class of operations unless it is fitted with, or carries, such equipment, including emergency equipment, as CASA approves or directs. Subregulation 207 (3) provides that the equipment must be fitted, carried or used in accordance with the directions (if any) of CASA.
In accordance with subregulations 207 (2) and (3) of CAR 1988, paragraph 3.1 of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 provides, among other things, that each crew member and each passenger must occupy a seat of an approved type when the aircraft is flying at a height less than 1 000 feet above the terrain. Paragraph 4.1 of CAO 20.16.3 provides that seat belts must also be worn at certain times.
This instrument applies to helicopters operated by Northshore Holdings (NT) Pty Limited, trading as Remote Helicopters Australia (the operator). It allows a passenger in a helicopter to be carried on the undercarriage for the purpose of leaving or boarding the helicopter while it is in the hover. It also allows a passenger not to wear a seat belt, or occupy a seat, at a height less than 1 000 feet above the terrain, when the helicopter is in the hover for the purpose of permitting him or her to leave or board the helicopter.
The operator has a requirement from time to time, in operations of a specialist nature in remote areas, such the collection of crocodile eggs, to emplane and deplane passengers from helicopters that are in the hover. In locations where suitable landing areas are not available, emplaning and deplaning in this manner is a safer option for suitably trained and experienced operators and personnel than attempting to land.
As a condition of the permission, such an operation will have to be carried out in a manner approved by CASA and set out in the operator’s operations manual.
Legislative Instruments Act
Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues a direction, instruction, notification, permission, approval or authority that in any way affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. The instrument affects the operation of paragraphs 3.1 and 4.1 of CAO 20.16.3 which requires that passengers must occupy seats of an approved type in certain circumstances. It is, therefore, a legislative instrument for the purposes of section 5 of the LIA. It is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of that Act.
Consultation
This instrument was requested by the operator. It was requested for the collection of crocodile eggs. The season for collection had already commenced at the time of the request and the operator asked that the exemption be granted as soon as possible. In view of the urgency and the fact that the conditions of instruments granted for this purpose are standard in nature (see instrument CASA 295/14 granted for the same purpose in the same time period), CASA decided that further consultation was not necessary.
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.
Making and commencement
The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.
The instrument commences on the day of registration. It expires at the end of November 2016, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.
[Instrument number CASA 293/14]
Attachment 1
Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights
Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011
Permission and direction — helicopter operations by Northshore Holdings (NT) Pty Limited, trading as Remote Helicopters Australia
This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.
Overview of the legislative instrument
This instrument applies to helicopters operated by Northshore Holdings (NT) Pty Limited, trading as Remote Helicopters Australia (the operator). It allows a passenger in a helicopter to be carried on the undercarriage for the purpose of leaving or boarding the helicopter while it is in the hover. It also allows a passenger not to wear a seat belt, or occupy a seat, at a height less than 1 000 feet above the terrain, when the helicopter is in the hover for the purpose of permitting him or her to leave or board the helicopter.
The primary purpose of the legislative instrument is to allow the aircraft to be operated by the operator in specialist operations in a manner approved by CASA.
Human rights implications
This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.
Conclusion
This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.
Civil Aviation Safety Authority