CASA 229/05 — Approval and directions — flight data recorders

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2005L01879 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

 

CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS 1988

 

APPROVAL AND DIRECTION — FLIGHT DATA RECORDERS UNDER SUBREGULATION 207 (2)

 

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.

 

Subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that an Australian aircraft must not be used in any class of operations unless it is fitted with such instruments and is fitted with or carries such equipment, including emergency equipment, as the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) approves or directs.

 

Paragraph 6.5 of Civil Aviation Order 20.18 provides that an aircraft to which that Order applies must be equipped with a flight data recorder that retains its last 25 hours of recording.

 

This approval provides that BHA AS 332 L (Super Puma) helicopters operated by Bristow Helicopters Pty Ltd may be equipped with flight recorders that retain their last 5 hours of recording.

 

CASA considers that the operation of the helicopter in accordance with this approval will not affect the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a Civil Aviation Order, and CASA later issues a direction, instruction, notification, permission, approval or authority that in any way affects the operation of the Civil Aviation Orders, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument for section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.

 

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA.

 

As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA has not been undertaken in this case.  Previous approvals have been issued for the same purpose to the named operator.

 

The instrument has been issued by a delegate of CASA.  It commences on the day after it is registered on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments and stops having effect at the end of June 2008.

 

 

[Instrument number  CASA 229/05]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, enacted by the Australian Government, were introduced to regulate the safety of civil aviation within Australia. The regulations provide the framework for ensuring that aircraft operating within Australian airspace meet specific safety standards. One such regulation, Subregulation 207(2), mandates that Australian aircraft must be equipped with approved instruments and equipment, including emergency equipment, as directed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This regulation is aimed at maintaining the highest safety standards for air navigation and the operation of aircraft. The authority to create these regulations stems from Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowering the Governor-General to establish such rules. The policy objective behind these regulations is to ensure the safety and efficiency of civil aviation operations within Australia.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically subregulation 207(2) under F2005L01879, applies to Australian aircraft that are subject to the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The regulation mandates that these aircraft must be equipped with instruments and equipment approved by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) before being used in any class of operations. This requirement includes carrying emergency equipment as directed by CASA. This particular legislative instrument focuses on the approval for BHA AS 332 L (Super Puma) helicopters operated by Bristow Helicopters Pty Ltd, permitting the use of flight data recorders that retain their last 5 hours of recording, differing from the standard 25 hours retention requirement. CASA has determined that this modification does not compromise the safety of air navigation. The regulation is subject to disallowance under section 46A of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and is considered a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The instrument, issued by a delegate of CASA, comes into effect the day after its registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments and ceases to have effect at the end of June 2008.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) have been amended to allow certain BHA AS 332 L (Super Puma) helicopters operated by Bristow Helicopters Pty Ltd to be equipped with flight data recorders that retain their last 5 hours of recording, rather than the standard 25 hours (sections 98, 207(2)). This is a specific approval granted under the authority of Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, empowering the Governor-General to make regulations. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has determined that equipping these helicopters with 5-hour flight data recorders will not compromise the safety of air navigation. The approval is detailed in a Civil Aviation Order (CAO) and aligns with paragraph 6.5 of CAO 20.18, which mandates the retention of 25 hours of recording for applicable aircraft. This specific approval is subject to the disallowance process as outlined in the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 and the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (LIA), although no consultation was undertaken for this particular instrument (sections 46A, 6(d)(i), 17, 38, 42 of the LIA). The instrument, issued by a delegate of CASA, comes into effect the day after its registration on the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments and will remain in force until the end of June 2008. The obligations imposed on Bristow Helicopters Pty Ltd under this regulation are to ensure that their BHA AS 332 L (Super Puma) helicopters are fitted with flight data recorders capable of retaining the last 5 hours of flight data. This requirement is in place to comply with the specific approval granted by CASA, ensuring that these helicopters meet the necessary safety standards while operating under the unique conditions specified by CASA. Bristow Helicopters Pty Ltd must also ensure that these flight data recorders are functioning correctly at all times and that the recorded data is readily accessible for any required safety investigations or audits. The company is obligated to maintain records of these flight data recorders, including their installation, maintenance, and any incidents recorded, in accordance with the regulatory framework established by CASA. Any breach of the regulations outlined in the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 can result in significant consequences. Under section 54 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, CASA has the authority to impose penalties for non-compliance. The maximum penalty for operating an aircraft that does not meet the regulatory requirements can include fines of up to $210,000 for individuals and $1,050,000 for corporations. Additionally, CASA can take enforcement actions such as grounding the aircraft, imposing operational restrictions, or revoking the operator’s licence if the breach is deemed serious enough to impact safety. These penalties serve as a deterrent to ensure that operators adhere to the regulations designed to maintain the highest standards of aviation safety.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Delegated & Subordinate Legislation
Offence Provisions
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.