CASA 202/11 – Direction – number of cabin attendants

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2011L00901 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. Subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3 (CAO 20.16.3) was made under regulation 208 of CAR 1988 and provides that aircraft carrying more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

CAO 20.16.3 has remained in the same form since 1960 and as such represents a 51 year gap since a reassessment of cabin attendant numbers against a criterion of allowable seating rather than passenger numbers. CASA in a report, Review of policies and practices for first-of-type certification of imported aircraft, recommended the recognition of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) certification standards. The recommendation was adopted.

The direction will allow Jetstar Airways Pty Limited (the operator) to operate Airbus A321-200 series aircraft with not less than 5 cabin attendants. CASA considers that the operator has addressed the risks associated with the proposed change to procedures. CASA also considers that the operator has increased the awareness and capability of passengers seated at emergency exit rows in a manner equivalent to, or better than, that achieved when the Airbus A321-200 series satisfied the requirements of EASA. CASA is satisfied the evacuation of a full complement of passengers could be achieved within 90 seconds, within the EASA guidelines for certification demonstrations.

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a Civil Aviation Order (CAO) and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

Consultation

CASA has consulted both internally and with the operator on the proposal. The consultation process was brought to a conclusion with CASA and the operator signing a document outlining agreements and undertakings. The instrument is similar to other instruments issued to other operators. In those instruments, the proposed change was also referred to the Office of Transport Security which has expressed no concerns.

Senate Regulations and Ordinances Committee concerns

This direction provides for the particular operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3 but it is considered to be a safe standard, consistent with international safety standards and practice.

The direction is 1 of a number of such instruments issued to, or renewed for, several operators pending CASA’s development of considered amendments to bring CAO 20.16.3 into line with new internationally recognised standards for cabin crew ratios (at least 1 cabin crew attendant for every 50 passenger seats, and 1 attendant for any incomplete part of that number).

The development and preparation of suitable CAO amendments is a more intensive and involved process than the evaluation and consideration of directions for a particular named operator. While such evaluation and consideration for an individual operator is itself detailed, and guided by the requirements of safety and prudence, it has not required extensive consultation with the broader industry.

Pending the finalisation of the project team’s work on the CAO, it is essentially unavoidable that CASA will issue or renew individual directions to operators on the same basis as has previously been done. The instrument will only be in force for a limited period pending finalisation of the project team’s work on the CAO.

The instrument commences on 1 June 2011 and stops having effect at the end of August 2011.

The direction has been issued by a delegate of CASA under subregulation 7 (1) of CAR 1988.

 

[Instrument number CASA 202/11]

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, enacted by the Parliament of Australia, provides a framework for ensuring the safety and efficiency of air navigation within Australia. In particular, the regulation empowers the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to make directions regarding the operating crew required on aircraft, with a focus on safety. One such direction pertains to the number of cabin attendants required on aircraft carrying between 36 and 216 passengers, which has not been updated since 1960. This long-standing regulation has prompted CASA to align with international standards, such as those set by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), by allowing Jetstar Airways Pty Limited to operate Airbus A321-200 series aircraft with a reduced number of cabin attendants, provided certain safety criteria are met. The policy objective is to maintain and enhance passenger safety during evacuation while adapting to modern operational standards.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and their associated orders and directions apply to all persons and entities involved in civil aviation operations within Australia, including aircraft operators, pilots, and cabin crew. The specific regulation in question, concerning the number of cabin attendants on aircraft, applies to aircraft operators who carry more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers. The Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3, under which the regulation falls, establishes the requirement for cabin attendants on aircraft based on passenger numbers. However, the direction issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) allows Jetstar Airways Pty Limited to operate Airbus A321-200 series aircraft with fewer cabin attendants, provided certain safety conditions are met. This direction is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is subject to disallowance by Parliament. The direction is limited in scope and duration, effective from 1 June 2011 to the end of August 2011, until CASA can finalise amendments to the Civil Aviation Order to align with international safety standards.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, through a specific direction, mandates that Jetstar Airways Pty Limited operating Airbus A321-200 series aircraft must carry a minimum of 5 cabin attendants (subsection 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, and subparagraph 6.1(b) of Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3). This requirement deviates from the previous standard which stipulated a cabin attendant for every 36 passengers or part thereof, a criterion that has remained unchanged since 1960. The Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) has deemed this new standard to be safe, aligning with international safety standards, particularly those of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). The obligations imposed by this direction on Jetstar Airways include ensuring that their operational procedures and crewing configurations meet the new cabin attendant requirements. The airline must demonstrate that they have adequately addressed the safety risks associated with this change and that they have enhanced passenger awareness and capability, particularly for those seated in emergency exit rows, to a level equivalent to, or better than, that achieved under EASA standards. CASA's satisfaction is contingent on the operator's ability to evacuate all passengers within 90 seconds, in accordance with EASA guidelines for certification demonstrations. Failure to comply with the provisions of this direction may result in significant legal consequences. Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, the direction is considered a disallowable instrument and is thus subject to tabling and disallowance in Parliament. The instrument itself is not exempt from these parliamentary scrutiny processes. Non-compliance with the safety directives or failure to meet the specified cabin crew numbers could lead to penalties that may include civil or criminal sanctions. Although the exact penalties are not specified in the provided text, such violations typically result in substantial fines and other regulatory actions that can severely impact the operator's reputation and operational capabilities.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations
Compliance Obligations
Consultation Requirements

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.