CASA 190/13 - Approval and directions - operations without an approved digital flight data recorder system

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L01763 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Approval and directions operations without an approved digital flight data recorder system

 

Legislation

Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers the Governor-General to make regulations.

 

Subregulation 207 (2) of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) provides that an Australian aircraft must not be used in any class of operations unless it is fitted with such instruments and is fitted with or carries such equipment, including emergency equipment, as the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) approves or directs.

 

Civil Aviation Order 20.18 (CAO 20.18) sets out instruments and equipment required for Australian aircraft engaged in certain classes of operations. Paragraph 6.1 provides that certain aircraft may be flown only if equipped with an approved flight data recorder system.

 

This approval, under subregulation 207 (2) of CAR 1988, permits aircraft VH-CCJ to operate without an approved flight data recorder system while being operated in private operations. The aircraft must, however, be equipped in all other respects as required by CAO 20.18 and must not be used for training flights.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a direction in the form of a Civil Aviation Order (CAO) and later issues another direction which has the effect of amending, varying or repealing the CAO, the later instrument is a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of paragraph 6.1 of CAO 20.18.

 

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Consultation

Consultation with the aviation industry as a whole has not been undertaken in relation to this exemption. It has been granted in relation to a single aircraft only which, as a condition of exemption, must not be used for flying training and must be used for private operations only. It has been agreed that the exemption be granted for a period of 3 years, considering the high cost of installation of a flight data recorder, until a national strategy is developed in relation to the installation of such equipment in a private aircraft. It is intended that all private operators be informed of the intended national strategy, once formulated, to allow them time to comply with any intended requirements that may be in place under it, relating to the carriage of such equipment. Consultation was undertaken with the aircraft manufacturer who advised there is currently no retrofit available to install a flight data recorder in the aircraft subject to this exemption. Consequently, enforcing a requirement to retrofit the aircraft would result in a complex and costly engineering activity of an unknown duration during which time the aircraft would be inoperable.

 

Making and commencement

The instrument has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration and expires at the end of 31 August 2016, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA 190/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Approval and directions operations without an approved
digital flight data recorder system

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument permits Cessna Aircraft Company C550 (Bravo) aeroplane, serial number 550-0953, with nationality and registration marks VH-CCJ, to be operated without an approved digital flight data recorder.

 

The instrument replaces instrument CASA 113/10 and directs that the aeroplane may only be operated in private operations, must not be operated in flying training operations, and must be fitted with a serviceable cockpit voice recorder. The aircraft must comply with all other requirements of Civil Aviation Order 20.18.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

 

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, enacted to ensure safety in the civil aviation sector, were amended to introduce an exemption for a specific aircraft, the Cessna Aircraft Company C550 (Bravo) aeroplane with serial number 550-0953 and registration marks VH-CCJ, from the requirement to be equipped with an approved digital flight data recorder. This exemption was introduced to address the impracticality and prohibitive cost of retrofitting such equipment, as advised by the aircraft manufacturer. The instrument, made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and overseen by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), allows the specified aircraft to operate without a digital flight data recorder provided it is used exclusively for private operations and not for flight training, and it must be fitted with a serviceable cockpit voice recorder. The exemption is intended to remain in effect until a national strategy regarding the installation of flight data recorders in private aircraft is developed, allowing operators time to comply with any new requirements. The instrument is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and is accompanied by a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, confirming its alignment with human rights obligations.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, as amended by F2013L01763, provide specific provisions regarding the operation of aircraft without an approved digital flight data recorder system. This particular legislative instrument allows the Cessna Aircraft Company C550 (Bravo) aeroplane, serial number 550-0953, registered as VH-CCJ, to operate without such a system under certain conditions. The aircraft must be used solely for private operations and must not be used for training flights. Furthermore, the aircraft must be equipped with a serviceable cockpit voice recorder and comply with all other requirements outlined in Civil Aviation Order 20.18. The exemption is granted for a period of three years, with the intention of allowing time for the development of a national strategy concerning the installation of digital flight data recorders in private aircraft. The instrument, which is a legislative instrument under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, was made by a delegate of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament. Importantly, this instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, and is thus compatible with human rights.

Key Provisions

The key operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) and associated Civil Aviation Orders (CAO) establish the requirements for aircraft equipment and operations. Section 98 of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 grants the Governor-General the authority to create regulations. Subregulation 207(2) of CAR 1988 mandates that Australian aircraft must be equipped with instruments and equipment approved or directed by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to be used in specific classes of operations. CAO 20.18 outlines the necessary instruments and equipment for Australian aircraft, including the requirement for an approved flight data recorder system for certain classes of operations. This specific legislation allows aircraft VH-CCJ to operate without an approved flight data recorder system, provided it is used solely for private operations and not for training flights. Despite this exemption, the aircraft must still comply with all other requirements outlined in CAO 20.18 and must be fitted with a serviceable cockpit voice recorder. The exemption aims to address the high cost of installing a flight data recorder, considering there is currently no retrofit option available for the aircraft in question. The obligations imposed on the parties governed by this Act include strict adherence to the operational restrictions imposed on aircraft VH-CCJ. The aircraft must be exclusively used for private operations, cannot be used for flying training, and must be equipped with a serviceable cockpit voice recorder. Furthermore, the aircraft must comply with all other stipulated requirements under CAO 20.18. In terms of penalties and consequences for breach, the regulations do not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties in the text provided. However, as a legislative instrument, any failure to comply with the regulations could potentially lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include fines, suspension of operation permits, or other regulatory sanctions. The disallowance process under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 could also apply to any subsequent amendments or variations to the CAO, subjecting them to parliamentary scrutiny and potential disallowance. Overall, this legislative instrument aims to balance the operational needs of a specific aircraft with safety and regulatory compliance, while ensuring that the human rights and freedoms recognised in international instruments are not infringed upon.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Prohibited Conduct

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.