CASA 170/13 - Direction - number of cabin attendants (National Jet Systems)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L01501 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants (National Jet Systems)

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. Paragraph 6.1 of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 was made under regulation 208 of CAR 1988 and provides, in subparagraph (b), that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

 

The direction will allow National Jet Systems Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Airline Services (the operator), to operate Boeing 717 type aircraft with not less than 3 cabin attendants in both regular public transport, and charter, operations. This contrasts with the 4 cabin attendants it would have to provide under subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3 if the aeroplane carried more than 108 passengers up to its maximum seating capacity of 125. The direction is based on the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America (FAA) approved manufacturer’s evacuation certification for the Boeing 717 aircraft which allows operations with 3 cabin attendants.

 

CASA considers that the operator has addressed the risks associated with the proposed change and in particular has:

  • provided an adequate safety risk management plan
  • planned satisfactory processes and procedures in support of the use of 3 cabin attendants
  • provided an effective demonstration of emergency evacuation procedures in support of the safety risk management plan
  • demonstrated a process for continuing cabin crew proficiency and supporting passenger capability in operating emergency exits in evacuation conditions.

 

CASA is satisfied the evacuation of a full complement of passengers could be achieved within 90 seconds. This is an FAA and European Aviation Safety Agency safety standard.

 

When the operator considers that there are less than 8 able-bodied passengers on board, which may occur when the aircraft is carrying less than its full complement of passengers, they must occupy the emergency exit rows in the sequence set out in the conditions. This ensures that they are occupied in accordance with the aircraft’s weight and balance loading requirements.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Senate Committee concerns

This direction provides for the operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3, but it is considered to be a standard consistent with international safety standards and practice.

 

The development and preparation of suitable amendments of the Regulations to avoid the need for individual directions and set a suitable standard for cabin crew numbers is continuing.

 

Consultation

Consultation has taken place on the increase in the number of passengers to cabin attendants in relation to many instruments applying the same ratio. CASA is satisfied that it can safely continue to issue directions under regulation 208 on the basis of the criteria previously mentioned in the statement.

 

This instrument itself renews instrument CASA 364/12. The operator applied for the renewal of this instrument.

 

Making and commencement

The exemption has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

The instrument commences on the day of registration. It stops having effect at the end of 31 July 2014, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA 170/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Direction — number of cabin attendants (National Jet Systems)

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument directs National Jet Systems Pty Ltd to operate an Australian registered Boeing 717 series aircraft with not less than 3 cabin attendants.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, enacted by the Australian Parliament, provide a framework for ensuring the safety and efficiency of civil aviation within Australia. The 1988 Act was introduced to address the need for comprehensive regulation of civil aviation to protect public safety, property, and the environment. Under the authority granted by this Act, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue directions to operators to ensure compliance with safety standards. One such direction concerns the number of cabin attendants required for Boeing 717 aircraft operated by National Jet Systems Pty Ltd. This direction permits the operator to carry a reduced number of cabin attendants, provided certain safety criteria are met, aligning with international safety standards while maintaining passenger safety during evacuations. The legislative instrument is subject to disallowance in the Parliament and includes a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, confirming that it does not engage any applicable rights or freedoms under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Scope and Application

The Direction—number of cabin attendants (National Jet Systems) issued under the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 applies specifically to National Jet Systems Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Airline Services, and concerns the number of cabin attendants required on Boeing 717 type aircraft. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 provides the legislative framework, enabling the Governor-General to make regulations for air navigation safety, which in turn allows the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions regarding operating crew. This particular direction is grounded in the Federal Aviation Administration's approved evacuation certification for the Boeing 717, allowing for operations with three cabin attendants instead of the four required under existing regulations when carrying more than 108 passengers. The direction aims to maintain safety standards while aligning with international practices. The application of this direction is national, impacting operations within Australia, and it is subject to disallowance in the Parliament under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003. The direction is also accompanied by a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights, asserting that the instrument does not engage any rights or freedoms under international human rights instruments.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) relevant to this direction are sections 98(1), 208, and the specific provisions of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3, particularly subparagraph 6.1(b). Section 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 allows the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act, including ensuring the safety of air navigation. Under section 208 of the CAR 1988, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) can issue directions regarding the operating crew required on an aircraft, taking into account safety. Paragraph 6.1(b) of CAO 20.16.3 mandates that aircraft carrying more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers must have a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number. The direction issued under this regulation allows National Jet Systems Pty Ltd, trading as Cobham Aviation Services Australia – Airline Services, to operate Boeing 717 aircraft with a minimum of 3 cabin attendants, provided the aircraft is carrying more than 36 passengers. The obligations imposed on National Jet Systems Pty Ltd by this direction are multi-faceted. Firstly, the operator must ensure that there are not less than 3 cabin attendants on board their Boeing 717 aircraft for both regular public transport and charter operations. Secondly, when the operator considers that there are fewer than 8 able-bodied passengers on board, these passengers must occupy specific emergency exit rows to comply with the aircraft's weight and balance loading requirements. Additionally, National Jet Systems must maintain an adequate safety risk management plan, implement satisfactory processes and procedures for the use of 3 cabin attendants, demonstrate effective emergency evacuation procedures, and ensure ongoing proficiency of cabin crew and passenger capability in operating emergency exits. Breaching the provisions of this direction can lead to various consequences. While specific penalties are not detailed within the explanatory statement, non-compliance with safety directives issued by CASA can generally result in enforcement actions, including fines and potential grounding of the aircraft. Under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, this direction is classified as a disallowable instrument and is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament. This means that if the Parliament wishes to disallow the direction, it can do so within a specified period, rendering the direction ineffective. Furthermore, the operator’s failure to comply with the stipulated cabin crew requirements could compromise passenger safety and result in severe regulatory repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Compliance Obligations
Safety Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.