CASA 144/15 - Direction — number of cabin attendants for Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft (Alliance Airlines)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2015L01700 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants for Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft (Alliance Airlines)

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an Australian aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. In the absence of such a direction, the operator must ensure that the minimum operating crew of the aircraft is not less than that specified in the certificate of airworthiness of, or the flight manual for, the aircraft.

 

Subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 was made under regulation 208 of CAR 1988 and provides that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number. In other words, there is a requirement for a 1 cabin attendant to 36 passenger ratio.

 

Background

The requirements in subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3 have remained in the same form since 1960 and as such represent over a 50 year gap since a reassessment of cabin attendant numbers against a criterion of allowable seating rather than passenger numbers. In a report titled Review of policies and practices for first-of-type certification of imported aircraft, CASA recommended the recognition of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) certification standards. The recommendation was adopted.

 

Certification of the aircraft relates to the design of the floor plan and the seating configuration in relation to the location of exits. CASA does not call for a reevaluation of the aircraft design; instead, CASA accepts the design criterion. CASA does require operators to demonstrate the safety procedures that are specific to the operator, which are evaluated, thus there is a distinction between the certification criterion and an operatorimposed safety procedure which may, or may not, enhance the evacuation of the aircraft in an emergency evacuation. CASA has increased passenger awareness and capability for passengers seated at self-help exit rows in a manner equivalent to, or better than, that achieved when the Fokker F28 MK 0100 and Fokker F28 MK 0070 satisfied the Joint Aviation Authorities (Europe), now EASA, standards.

 

Instrument

CASA 264/14 is an instrument of direction issued by CASA in October 2014 that allowed Alliance Airlines Pty Limited (the operator) to operate Fokker F28 MK 0100 and Fokker F28 MK 0070 aircraft with a 1 cabin attendant to 50 passenger seats ratio. CASA 264/14 will expire at the end of October 2015. The operator has requested that the direction be continued for a further period. CASA 144/15 commences on 1 November 2015 and replaces CASA 264/14.

 

CASA is satisfied that the evacuation of a full complement of passengers for the 2 specified types of aircraft is able to be achieved in a time of 90 seconds. CASA is also satisfied that the evacuation procedures adopted by the operator to support its application to operate with the certification criterion for the number of cabin attendants have been demonstrated successfully. For Fokker F28 MK 0100 aircraft, the certification criterion is 2 cabin attendants to a maximum of 100 passenger seats fitted to the aircraft. For Fokker F28 MK 0070 aircraft, the certification criterion is 2 cabin attendants to a maximum of 85 passenger seats fitted to the aircraft. The maximum permitted time for evacuation of the aircraft by the operator is 90 seconds and is set out as a condition in Schedule 1 of the instrument.

 

The other conditions include a requirement that the briefing of passengers in self-help exit rows must be as approved by CASA and be conducted in the manner set out in the operator’s operations manual.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

CASA 144/15 has been issued at the request of the operator. The instrument is similar to an existing instrument of direction (CASA 264/14 refers). Earlier consultation was undertaken following the issue of the CASA report that recommended the recognition of the EASA certification standards in relation to setting the ratio of cabin attendants to passenger seats. CASA has conducted a risk assessment and considers that no further consultation is appropriate or necessary under section 17 of the LIA as the instrument applies only to aircraft operated by the operator.

 

Senate Committee concerns

This direction provides for the operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3, but it is considered to be a standard consistent with international safety standards and practice.

 

The development and preparation of suitable standards with appropriate conditions is also continuing in conjunction with the preparation of new regulations applicable to all air transport operators.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Making and commencement

The direction has been made by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

The instrument commences on 1 November 2015. It expires at the end of October 2017, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

[Instrument number CASA 144/15]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

 

Direction — number of cabin attendants for Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft (Alliance Airlines)

 

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

 

Overview of the legislative instrument

The legislative instrument directs that Alliance Airlines Pty Limited (the operator) may operate Australian registered Fokker F28 MK 0100 and Fokker F28 MK 0070 aircraft if they carry 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number.

 

The legislative instrument replaces an earlier direction (CASA 264/14) to, in effect, extend the period of the direction until the end of October 2017 and increases the maximum seating capacity of the Fokker F28 MK 0070 aircraft from 75 to 80 passengers.

 

The primary purpose of the legislative instrument is to allow the aircraft to be operated by the operator without the number of cabin attendants specified in Civil Aviation Order 20.16.3. Use of the lower number of cabin attendants is subject to compliance with the stated conditions imposed in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

 

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted to provide a comprehensive framework for the regulation of civil aviation in Australia, ensuring safety and efficiency in air navigation. This particular legislative instrument, CASA 144/15, issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in 2015, addresses a gap in the existing regulations concerning the number of cabin attendants required for Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft operated by Alliance Airlines. The Civil Aviation Act 1988 empowers CASA to issue such directions to maintain air navigation safety, and this instrument is a continuation and extension of CASA 264/14, allowing Alliance Airlines to operate these aircraft with a cabin attendant to passenger seat ratio of 1 to 50, subject to specific conditions. The policy objective is to ensure that the safety standards for aircraft operations align with international benchmarks while accommodating the unique design and seating configurations of these aircraft types.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 Direction (CASA 144/15) issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) applies specifically to Alliance Airlines Pty Limited, enabling the operator to use a different ratio of cabin attendants to passenger seats for Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft than that prescribed in the Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3. This direction allows the airline to operate these aircraft with 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number, differing from the conventional 1 cabin attendant to 36 passenger ratio. The direction is made under the authority of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and is intended to ensure the safety of air navigation. CASA has determined that this modified ratio, in conjunction with the operator's specific safety procedures, allows for an effective 90-second evacuation of the aircraft. The direction applies to Australian registered Fokker F70 and Fokker F100 aircraft operated by Alliance Airlines and includes conditions that must be met, such as the briefing of passengers in self-help exit rows. This instrument replaces an earlier direction (CASA 264/14) and extends its validity until the end of October 2017. It is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003, and a Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights confirms its alignment with international human rights standards.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988) and the Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 establish the framework for the number of cabin attendants required on aircraft based on passenger numbers, with specific provisions for aircraft types like the Fokker F28 MK 0100 and Fokker F28 MK 0070. Section 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 allows for the Governor-General to make regulations for the Act in the interests of the safety of air navigation. Regulation 208 of the CAR 1988 authorises the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) to issue directions regarding the operating crew required on Australian aircraft, taking into account safety considerations. CAO 20.16.3, made under this regulation, stipulates that aircraft carrying more than 36 but not more than 216 passengers must have one cabin attendant for every 36 passengers or part of that number. This direction aims to ensure a balance between passenger safety and operational efficiency. The obligations imposed by CASA 144/15 on Alliance Airlines Pty Limited include adhering to a cabin attendant to passenger seat ratio of 1 to 50, ensuring that passenger briefings in self-help exit rows are conducted as approved by CASA and in accordance with the operator’s operations manual, and demonstrating that the evacuation of all passengers can be achieved within 90 seconds. These obligations are designed to maintain safety standards while allowing the operator to utilise a lower number of cabin attendants compared to the general requirements set out in CAO 20.16.3. The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 and the associated orders do not specify particular offences, penalties, or civil/criminal consequences for breach in the context of CASA 144/15. However, failure to comply with CASA directions can lead to enforcement actions by CASA, which may include grounding of aircraft, fines, and other regulatory measures. The specific consequences depend on the nature and severity of the non-compliance and are determined in accordance with the Civil Aviation Act 1988 and related regulations. The Legislative Instruments Act 2003 provides a framework for the tabling and disallowance of instruments such as CASA 144/15, ensuring parliamentary oversight and accountability.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Offence Provisions

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.