CASA 133/13 - Direction — number of cabin attendants (Sunstate Airlines)

Administered by Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, Sport and the Arts

Legislation au F2013L01280 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Explanatory Statement

Civil Aviation Regulations 1988

Direction — number of cabin attendants (Sunstate Airlines)

Legislation

Subsection 98 (1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988 (the Act) provides that the Governor-General may make regulations for the Act and in the interests of the safety of air navigation.

 

Under regulation 208 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 (CAR 1988), CASA may give directions as to the operating crew required to be carried on an aircraft having regard to the safety of air navigation. Subparagraph 6.1 (b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3 was made under regulation 208 of CAR 1988 and provides, that aircraft carrying more than 36 and not more than 216 passengers must carry a cabin attendant for each unit of 36 passengers or part of that number.

 

The requirements in subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3 have remained in the same form since 1960 and as such represent a 53 year gap since a reassessment of cabin attendant numbers against a criterion of allowable seating rather than passenger numbers. CASA in a report Review of policies and practices for first-of-type certification of imported aircraft, recommended the recognition of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency certification standards. The recommendation was adopted.

 

The direction is a renewal of a former direction, CASA 206/12, which expires at the end of June 2013. The direction will allow Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited (the operator) to operate the Dash 8-400 type aircraft with 2 cabin attendants. The operator has addressed the risks associated with the proposed change to procedures. The operator has also increased passenger awareness and capability for passengers seated at self-help exit rows in a manner equivalent to, or better than, that achieved when the Dash 8-400 type satisfied the requirements of Transport Canada. CASA is satisfied the evacuation of a full complement of passengers could be achieved within 90 seconds, within the Transport Canada guidelines for certification demonstrations.

 

The question of cabin attendant ratios under CAO 20.16.3 is subject to ongoing discussion and the current instrument will only be in force up to the end of 30 June 2013. Instruments of this type are being issued for limited periods only. It is hoped that there will be a resolution of the issues involved, making the issue of individual directions to operators unnecessary.

 

Legislative Instruments Act

Under subparagraph 6 (d) (i) of the Legislative Instrument Act 2003 (the LIA), an instrument is a legislative instrument for section 5 of the LIA if it is declared to be a disallowable instrument under legislation in force before the commencement of the LIA. Under regulation 5A of CAR 1988, if CASA has issued a CAO, and CASA later issues a direction that affects the operation of the CAO, the later document is declared to be a disallowable instrument. The instrument affects the operation of subparagraph 6.1 (b) of CAO 20.16.3. As a legislative instrument, it is subject to tabling and disallowance in the Parliament under sections 38 and 42 of the LIA.

 

Consultation

Consultation under section 17 of the LIA was undertaken following the issue of the CASA report that recommended the recognition of the FAA certification standards,  in relation to setting the ratio of cabin attendants to passenger seats.

 

This instrument replaces instrument CASA 206/12, which stops having effect at the end of June 2013. CASA consulted both internally and with the operator before issuing earlier instruments to the operator that had the same effect. The instrument is similar to instruments issued to other operators that have been the subject of consultation within CASA and with other bodies.

 

Senate Committee concerns

This direction provides for the operator to meet a new standard for cabin crew numbers. The new standard differs from that currently promulgated in CAO 20.16.3, but it is considered to be a standard consistent with international safety standards and practice.

 

The development and preparation of suitable standards with appropriate conditions is also continuing in conjunction with the preparation of new regulations applicable to all air transport operators.

 

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

A Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights is at Attachment 1.

 

Commencement and making

The instrument commences on 1 July 2013 and stops having effect at the end of
30 June 2014, as if it had been repealed by another instrument.

 

The direction has been issued by a delegate of CASA relying on the power of delegation under subregulation 11.260 (1) of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998.

 

[Instrument number CASA 133/13]

Attachment 1

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Direction — number of cabin attendants (Sunstate Airlines)

This legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the
Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011.

Overview of the legislative instrument

The instrument allows Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited to operate Australian registered Dash 8- 400 aircraft if they carry 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number.

Human rights implications

This legislative instrument does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms.

Conclusion

This legislative instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Civil Aviation Safety Authority

Overview

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 were enacted by the Australian Parliament to regulate civil aviation in Australia, ensuring the safety of air navigation. The Civil Aviation (Aircrew Certification and Cabin Attendants) Direction 2013, issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA), addresses a long-standing issue regarding cabin attendant ratios on aircraft, particularly concerning the Dash 8-400 aircraft operated by Sunstate Airlines. The direction allows Sunstate Airlines to operate the Dash 8-400 with 2 cabin attendants, aligning with international safety standards while maintaining the safety of air navigation. The policy objective is to ensure that the evacuation of a full complement of passengers can be achieved within 90 seconds, consistent with Transport Canada guidelines for certification demonstrations. This legislative instrument is subject to disallowance in the Parliament and is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

Scope and Application

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988 Direction—number of cabin attendants (Sunstate Airlines) applies specifically to Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited, allowing them to operate Dash 8-400 aircraft under different cabin attendant requirements. This legislation falls within the Commonwealth jurisdiction, as it is a directive issued by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) under the Civil Aviation Act 1988. The direction modifies the existing cabin attendant requirements set forth in subparagraph 6.1(b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3, which has been unchanged since 1960. The new requirements permit Sunstate Airlines to carry 1 cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number, a change reflecting updated international safety standards. This legislative instrument is subject to disallowance under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 and was developed after consultation with the operator and internal CASA stakeholders, aligning with ongoing efforts to harmonise cabin crew standards across the aviation industry. The direction is temporary, effective until 30 June 2014, with hopes for a broader resolution to the cabin attendant ratio issue to eliminate the need for individual operator directions.

Key Provisions

The Civil Aviation Regulations 1988, specifically through the direction under subsection 98(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, have been amended to allow Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited to operate Dash 8-400 type aircraft with a reduced number of cabin attendants. Under the new provisions, Sunstate Airlines can now operate these aircraft with one cabin attendant for every 50 passenger seats or part of that number, as outlined in subparagraph 6.1(b) of Civil Aviation Order (CAO) 20.16.3. This change marks a departure from the previous requirement of one cabin attendant for every 36 passengers or part of that number, which has remained unchanged since 1960. The new requirement aligns with international safety standards and is consistent with the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America and the European Aviation Safety Agency certification standards. The obligations imposed on Sunstate Airlines under this direction include ensuring that the risks associated with the reduced number of cabin attendants are adequately managed. This involves increasing passenger awareness and capability for those seated at self-help exit rows, to ensure that the evacuation of a full complement of passengers can be achieved within 90 seconds, as per the guidelines set by Transport Canada. Sunstate Airlines must also ensure that their operational procedures remain compliant with the safety standards set forth by the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA). This includes maintaining updated safety protocols and conducting regular training and drills for both cabin crew and passengers. Breach of the provisions set forth in this direction can result in significant consequences. Under the Civil Aviation Act 1988, any non-compliance with the direction could potentially lead to enforcement actions by CASA. The potential penalties for non-compliance could include fines, operational restrictions, or even the suspension of the airline's operating certificate. The maximum penalties for such breaches are not explicitly stated in the direction but are generally governed by the broader provisions of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, which can include substantial financial penalties and other regulatory actions to ensure compliance with safety standards.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Civil Aviation Law
Instrument
Direction
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Enforcement Powers
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.