Commonwealth of Australia
Broadcasting Services Act 1992
Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice
No. 1 of 1994 (Amendment No. 1 of 2003)
I, RICHARD KENNETH ROBERT ALSTON, Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, being satisfied, in respect of each event that the following Notice removes from the Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice No. 1 of 1994, that:
(a) the national broadcasters and the commercial television broadcasting licensees have had a real opportunity to acquire, on a fair commercial basis, the right to televise the event; and
(b) each of those persons has declined to acquire that right;
issue the following Notice under subsection 115(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992.
Dated 11 September 2003
Minister for Communications,
Information Technology and the Arts
____________________
1. Amendment
1.1 The Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice No. 1 of 1994 is amended as set out in
this Notice.
1.2 This Notice commences on the date of signature.
2. Schedule (Events)
2.1 Item 5.1:
Omit “, other than a match of that kind played against the senior West Indian representative team in April, May or June 2003”.
2.2 Item 5.2:
Omit “played against the senior West Indian representative team in April, May or June 2003”, substitute “played in India in October or November 2003”.
____________________
Overview
The Commonwealth of Australia Broadcasting Services Act 1992 was enacted to regulate the provision of broadcasting services within Australia, aiming to ensure that broadcasting content is managed in a manner that reflects the cultural diversity of the nation and the broadcasting services provided are of high quality. The Act establishes a framework for the regulation of television and radio broadcasting services, including the licensing and classification of content, and provides mechanisms for the enforcement of these regulations. The Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice No. 1 of 1994 (Amendment No. 1 of 2003) was introduced to address specific events that the government deemed necessary to include in the list of events of national significance, ensuring these events are televised in a manner that is accessible to the public. The notice was issued by the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, Richard Kenneth Robert Alston, under subsection 115(2) of the Broadcasting Services Act 1992, following the decline of national broadcasters and commercial television broadcasting licensees to acquire the rights to televise certain cricket matches. The policy objective behind this amendment was to ensure that significant national events, such as international cricket matches, were televised to the broader public, reflecting the importance of these events to the nation's cultural and sporting life.
Scope and Application
The Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice No. 1 of 1994 (Amendment No. 1 of 2003) under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 applies to national broadcasters and commercial television broadcasting licensees, specifically targeting their rights to televise certain events. The amendment addresses the televising of cricket matches, removing the restriction on televising matches played against the senior West Indian representative team in April, May, or June 2003, and instead extending the restriction to matches played in India in October or November 2003. This amendment is issued by the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, who is satisfied that broadcasters had a fair commercial opportunity to acquire the rights to these events but declined to do so. The amendment comes into effect on the date of signature and modifies the original notice by removing specific exceptions and updating the conditions under which certain events cannot be televised. This legislative instrument underscores the importance of providing broadcasters with a fair opportunity to acquire broadcasting rights, while also adjusting the scope of restricted events based on the specific circumstances of the time.
Key Provisions
The Broadcasting Services (Events) Notice No. 1 of 1994 (Amendment No. 1 of 2003), issued by the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts, makes amendments to the original Notice. The Notice removes certain events from the list of those that require free-to-air coverage by national broadcasters and commercial television broadcasting licensees under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992. Specifically, it removes events related to cricket matches played by the Australian cricket team against the senior West Indian representative team. The original Notice had exempted certain matches from free-to-air coverage if they were played in April, May, or June 2003, but the Amendment No. 1 of 2003 changes this to include only matches played in India in October or November 2003.
Under this Amendment, the national broadcasters and commercial television broadcasting licensees must have had a real opportunity to acquire, on a fair commercial basis, the right to televise the amended events. However, they have declined to acquire that right. Consequently, these events no longer fall under the obligation of free-to-air coverage, as they have been omitted from the original Notice.
The Broadcasting Services Act 1992 imposes several obligations on the parties governed by it. The national broadcasters and commercial television broadcasting licensees must ensure they have a real opportunity to acquire the right to televise the listed events on a fair commercial basis. If they decline to acquire this right, they are exempt from the requirement to provide free-to-air coverage. This process ensures that broadcasting rights are negotiated fairly and allows broadcasters to make commercial decisions without being mandated to cover certain events.
Failure to comply with the obligations set out in the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 and the related notices can lead to various consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the Notice itself, breaches of broadcasting obligations under the Act can result in substantial fines and other civil or criminal consequences. The maximum penalties for contravening the Act can vary, but they may include fines of up to $50,000 for individuals and up to $250,000 for bodies corporate, depending on the severity and nature of the breach.