EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
BOUNTY (SHIPS) ACT 1980
BOUNTY (SHIPS) (RESERVATION OF BOUNTY REGULATIONS (AMENDMENT)
STATUTORY RULES 1988 NO. 360
ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR INDUSTRY, TECHNOLOGY AND COMMERCE
Statutory Rules 1988 No. 176, amongst other things, amended subregulation 3(1) of the Bounty (Ships) (Reservation of Bounty) Regulations to allow registered shipbuilders who are “associates of the owner” (a term defined in subsection 3(3) of the Bounty (Ships) Act 1980) to reserve amounts of bounty. This amendment took effect from the date of gazettal of the Statutory Rules (8 July 1988).
However, it has since come to light that this amendment will adversely effect some shipbuilders who have entered into contracts with associated parties between 15 June 1987 (the date of gazettal of Statutory Rules 1987 No. 116 which were the Statutory Rules which gave effect to the new reservation policy for the Bounty Ships regime) and 8 July 1988. To overcome this, new subregulation 3(3) is inserted which provides that any shipbuilder who was an associate of the owner of a bountiable vessel between 15 June 1987 and 8 July 1988 will not, because of that association, be ineligible to apply for a reservation of bounty.
As these Statutory Rules confer a benefit, subsection 48(2) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is not offended.
Overview
The Bounty (Ships) Act 1980 was enacted to address the issue of providing financial assistance, or bounty, to Australian shipbuilders for the construction of eligible ships. The Act aims to support the Australian shipbuilding industry by ensuring that shipbuilders receive financial rewards for their work on qualifying vessels. The policy objective behind the Act is to bolster the competitiveness of the Australian maritime sector, encourage shipbuilding activities, and maintain employment within the industry. The Bounty (Ships) (Reservation of Bounty) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1988 No. 360, issued under the authority of the Minister of State for Industry, Technology and Commerce, sought to refine the eligibility criteria for shipbuilders to reserve bounty amounts. However, it was identified that these amendments would disadvantage certain shipbuilders who had entered into contracts with associated parties during a specific transitional period. To rectify this, the new subregulation 3(3) was introduced to ensure that shipbuilders who were associates of vessel owners between 15 June 1987 and 8 July 1988 are not rendered ineligible for bounty reservations due to their association. This adjustment aims to provide a more equitable outcome for affected shipbuilders while maintaining the overall intent of the Bounty (Ships) Act.
Scope and Application
The Bounty (Ships) (Reservation of Bounty) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1988 No. 360, issued by the authority of the Minister of State for Industry, Technology and Commerce, amends the Bounty (Ships) (Reservation of Bounty) Regulations to provide that registered shipbuilders who are associates of the owner of a bountiable vessel can reserve amounts of bounty. This amendment extends the eligibility for bounty reservation to a broader category of shipbuilders, specifically those who are associated with the ship owner, a term defined in the Bounty (Ships) Act 1980. The amendment aims to rectify an unintended consequence of a previous regulation (Statutory Rules 1987 No. 116) that came into effect on 15 June 1987, by ensuring that shipbuilders who were associates of the owner between 15 June 1987 and 8 July 1988 are not excluded from applying for bounty reservation. This change is designed to support those shipbuilders who entered into contracts during this transitional period, ensuring they are not disadvantaged by the change in policy. The application of these rules is governed by the Acts Interpretation Act 1901, which allows for the conferral of benefits through statutory rules without contravening subsection 48(2).
Key Provisions
The Bounty (Ships) (Reservation of Bounty) Regulations (Amendment) Statutory Rules 1988 No. 360, which were issued by the authority of the Minister of State for Industry, Technology and Commerces, include key provisions that amend the existing Bounty (Ships) Act 1980. The primary change introduced by these rules, as mentioned in the Explanatory Statement, is the amendment of subregulation 3(1) to allow registered shipbuilders who are "associates of the owner" to reserve bounty amounts. This term, "associates of the owner," is defined in subsection 3(3) of the Bounty (Ships) Act 1980. The amendment came into effect on the date of gazettal of the Statutory Rules, which was 8 July 1988.
The Act imposes certain obligations on the parties it governs. Registered shipbuilders who are associates of the ship owner now have the right to reserve bounty amounts, a privilege previously not extended to them. This change is intended to provide clarity and fairness in the Bounty (Ships) regime by ensuring that shipbuilders who were associated with the owner during the specified period are not disadvantaged. Specifically, the new subregulation 3(3) ensures that any shipbuilder who was an associate of the owner of a bountable vessel between 15 June 1987 and 8 July 1988 will not be ineligible to apply for a reservation of bounty due to that association.
The implications of failing to comply with the provisions of these Statutory Rules can lead to significant consequences. Although the Explanatory Statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences, it is reasonable to infer that breaches of these regulations could lead to legal action. The Acts Interpretation Act 1901 provides that these Statutory Rules do not contravene subsection 48(2), suggesting that the rules are within the legislative framework. However, non-compliance with the specific provisions of the Bounty (Ships) Act 1980 and its regulations could potentially result in civil or administrative penalties, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. It is crucial for parties involved in the Bounty (Ships) regime to adhere to these regulations to avoid any adverse legal consequences.