EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
STATUTORY RULES 1983 NO. 107
Amendment of the Bounty (Injection-Moulding Equipment) Regulations
Issued by the Authority of the Minister of State for Industry and Commerce.
The purpose of the proposed regulations is to amend the Bounty (Injection-moulding Equipment) Regulations to provide for a more practical method of labelling items of injection-moulding equipment.
Existing regulation 3 specifies the conditions to be complied with in connection with the manufacture at registered premises of bountiable injectionmoulding equipment.
Existing sub-regulation 3(a) provides that items of injection-moulding equipment shall be allotted consecutive numbers. Existing sub-regulation 3(b) provides that the number allotted shall be affixed to the items of equipment by being stamped by means of a die on the equipment or on a metal plate that is securely rivetted, bolted or screwed to the equipment.
It has been discovered that these labelling requirements are not practical in regard to the manufacture of certain parts as, for example, where official metal labels have to be removed prior to the incorporation of that item into a machine.
Regulation 1 replaces existing sub-regulation 3(b) with a new requirement to provide that the number allotted to an item of injection-moulding equipment shall be stamped on that item by means of a die or clearly stamped or embossed on a label that is securely affixed to that item.
Consequently, it is still permissible to use the metal label system, but it is not obligatory.
Regulation 2 provides that regulation 1 applies in relation to the numbering of items of injection-moulding equipment on or after 23 July 1982 which is the date on which the Bounty (Injection-moulding Equipment) Regulations came into operation.
Although the proposed regulations are deemed to come into operation retrospectively, they are not prejudicial to parties other than the Commonwealth and therefore do not contravene section 48 of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
Overview
The Bounty (Injection-moulding Equipment) Regulations Amendment Statutory Rules 1983 No. 107 were enacted to address the practical difficulties encountered in the labelling of injection-moulding equipment, particularly in situations where metal labels needed to be removed during manufacturing. This legislation was introduced by the Authority of the Minister of State for Industry and Commerce to provide a more adaptable method for labelling such equipment. The policy objective was to ensure that the labelling process could be effectively carried out without compromising the integrity of the equipment or the efficiency of the manufacturing process. Regulation 1 modifies the existing requirement to affix numbers by stamping directly on the equipment or on a metal plate, to allow for stamping on a die or clearly on a label securely attached to the equipment. This change facilitates the labelling process in scenarios where metal labels must be removed before assembly. Regulation 2 specifies that these new labelling requirements apply to equipment numbered on or after 23 July 1982, the date the original regulations came into operation, thereby ensuring a smooth transition while accommodating practical manufacturing needs.
Scope and Application
The Bounty (Injection-moulding Equipment) Regulations Amendment (Labelling) Statutory Rules 1983 No. 107, issued under the authority of the Minister of State for Industry and Commerce, aim to refine the practical application of labelling requirements for injection-moulding equipment. These regulations apply to all items of injection-moulding equipment manufactured at registered premises in Australia, specifically affecting entities engaged in the production of such equipment. The amendment addresses the impracticality of existing labelling methods, particularly where metal labels need to be removed, by allowing the numbering to be stamped directly onto the equipment or alternatively on a securely affixed label. Regulation 1 modifies the existing sub-regulation 3(b) to accommodate these practical considerations, while Regulation 2 specifies that the new labelling method applies to equipment manufactured from 23 July 1982 onwards. This amendment, although deemed retrospective, does not prejudice any parties other than the Commonwealth, thus complying with the Acts Interpretation Act 1901.
Key Provisions
The Bounty (Injection-Moulding Equipment) Regulations Amendment (2004) modifies the Bounty (Injection-Moulding Equipment) Regulations to facilitate a more practical approach to labelling items of injection-moulding equipment. Regulation 1 specifically addresses the method of affixing numbers to these items. Under the existing regulation 3(b), manufacturers were required to stamp the allotted number onto the equipment or a metal plate securely attached to it. However, this requirement has proven impractical for certain manufacturing processes, particularly those involving the removal of official metal labels before equipment is incorporated into a machine. To address this, regulation 1 replaces the previous stamping requirement with a new stipulation that the number must be stamped by a die or clearly stamped or embossed on a label securely affixed to the equipment. This amendment allows for more flexibility in how the numbers are applied, making the process more efficient and practical for manufacturers.
The obligations under these regulations primarily revolve around ensuring that all items of injection-moulding equipment are correctly numbered in compliance with the new labelling requirements. Manufacturers must affix the allotted numbers either by stamping them directly onto the equipment using a die or by applying them to a securely affixed label. This change ensures that the labelling process is adaptable to various manufacturing contexts without compromising the integrity of the identification system. It is important for manufacturers to adhere to these updated procedures to maintain compliance with the regulations.
Failure to comply with these labelling requirements may result in significant consequences. Although the specific penalties for non-compliance are not detailed within the provided text, it is reasonable to infer that breaches of these regulations could lead to administrative or legal repercussions. Such penalties may include fines, the revocation of manufacturing licenses, or other forms of enforcement action taken by the relevant regulatory authorities. Ensuring adherence to these regulations is therefore crucial for manufacturers to avoid potential legal or financial penalties.