STATUTORY RULES.
1920. No. 40.
REGULATION UNDER THE BEER EXCISE ACT 1901–1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Beer Excise Act 1901–1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this tenth day of March, 1920.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
W. MASSY GREENE,
Minister of State for Trade and Customs.
Amendment of Beer Excise Regulations 1913.
(Statutory Rules 1913, No. 317.)
After regulation 26 of the Beer Excise Regulations the following regulation is inserted:—
Samples.
“26A. (1) A sample taken or obtained by an officer under the provisions of section 57 of the Beer Excise Act 1901-1918 shall, when required by the Collector be dealt with in the following manner:—
(a) the officer taking or obtaining the sample shall, in the presence of the person or the agent or servant of the person, from whom the sample is taken or obtained, divide the sample into three equal parts and label or mark and securely seal each part; and
(b) the officer shall hand one part to the owner or his agent or servant, deliver for report another part to an analyst approved by the Collector, and retain the third part, if necessary, for further examination.
“(2) Delivery of the part to the analyst may be effected personally or by sending the part by registered post addressed to the analyst at his usual address, or in such other manner as the Collector approves.
“(3) In the event of any dispute as to the identity of the part received by the analyst the burden of proof shall lie upon the person complaining.
“(4) The production of a certificate of analysis of the part purporting to be signed by the analyst shall be sufficient evidence of the identity of the part and of the result of the analysis, without proof of the signature of the person purporting to have signed the certificate.” (T. & C. 20/A.185.)
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1920, No. 40, made under the authority of the Beer Excise Act 1901-1918, address a procedural gap in the handling of samples taken during the enforcement of beer excise laws. Enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia's Governor-General, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, these regulations were designed to ensure a standardised and reliable process for the division, labelling, and analysis of beer samples. The overarching policy objective is to maintain the integrity and fairness of the excise system by providing clear guidelines for the management of samples, ensuring that all parties involved in the process have a secure and identifiable part of the sample for their own records or analysis. This regulation specifically aims to prevent disputes by establishing a clear protocol for sample handling and analysis, thereby supporting the enforcement of excise regulations on beer.
Scope and Application
The Beer Excise Regulations 1913, as amended by Statutory Rules 1920, No. 40, apply to the process of taking and handling samples of beer for excise purposes under the Beer Excise Act 1901–1918. These regulations govern the procedure for officers when obtaining a sample, requiring the sample to be divided into three equal parts, each to be sealed and handled according to specific protocols. This process ensures that the sample is appropriately managed, with one part given to the owner or their representative, another sent to an approved analyst for analysis, and the third retained by the officer for any further examination. The amendments clarify the method of delivering the sample to the analyst and the burden of proof in case of disputes over the sample’s identity. The regulations extend across the Commonwealth of Australia, applying uniformly as per the legislative authority granted under the Beer Excise Act.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of this legislation, specifically the amendment to the Beer Excise Regulations 1913, introduce Regulation 26A. This new regulation pertains to the handling of beer samples taken by officers under the Beer Excise Act 1901-1918. According to Section 26A(1), when a sample is taken, it must be divided into three equal parts by the officer in the presence of the sample's owner or their representative. Each part is to be labelled, marked, and securely sealed. One part is handed to the owner or their agent, another is sent to an approved analyst for analysis, and the third part is retained by the officer for any further examination that may be necessary. The manner of delivery to the analyst can be in person, by registered post, or as approved by the Collector (Section 26A(2)). In case of any dispute regarding the identity of the sample part received by the analyst, the burden of proof lies with the complainant, as outlined in Section 26A(3). A certificate of analysis signed by the analyst is considered sufficient evidence of the sample's identity and the analysis result, without requiring proof of the analyst's signature (Section 26A(4)).
The obligations imposed by this regulation primarily concern the officers taking samples and the owners of the beer samples. Officers are required to divide the sample into three equal parts, ensure each part is properly labelled and sealed, and distribute them as specified. Owners of the beer samples are expected to cooperate with the officers during the sample division process. The analyst, upon receiving their part of the sample, must conduct the analysis and provide a certificate of their findings, which serves as evidence in any subsequent disputes.
Failure to comply with these regulations could result in legal consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the provided text, breaches of the Beer Excise Act or its regulations could lead to enforcement actions, fines, or other penalties as prescribed by the Act or relevant authorities. The exact nature and extent of these consequences would depend on the specific circumstances of the breach and any additional provisions within the broader legislative framework.