Bankruptcy Rules (Amendment) 1995 No. 251
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT STATUTORY RULES 1995 No. 251
Issued by the Authority of the Minister for justice
Bankruptcy Act 1966
Bankruptcy Rules (Amendment)
Subsection 315(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (the Act) provides that the Governor General may make rules prescribing matters that are required or permitted to be prescribed or that are necessary or convenient to be prescribed for the carrying out or giving effect to the Act.
The costs which solicitors may charge are set out in rule 162 and in Schedule 3. In 1993, in line with a recommendation by the Federal Costs Advisory Committee, subrule 162(2B) was inserted, which had the effect of increasing those costs by 2.92 per cent. The proposed rules, in line with subsequent recommendations by the Committee, further increase those costs. This is done by replacing subrule 162(2B) with a new subrule that increases the base costs in rule 162 and in Schedule 3 by 9.01 per cent.
Details of the regulations are set out below. Rule 1 - Amendment
Rule 1.1 provides that the Bankruptcy Rules are amended as set out in these rules. Rule 2 - Rule 162 (Scale of costs)
Subrule 162(2B)
Rule 2.1
Rule 162 of the Bankruptcy Rules sets out the scale of solicitors' costs in bankruptcy matters. Subrule 162(1) provides that except as otherwise ordered, in all proceedings solicitors are entitled to charge and be allowed costs as specified in Schedule 3.
Schedule 3 itemises matters in connection with which costs are payable to solicitors and the amount of costs payable in respect of each item. Subrule 162(2B), which increased the costs specified in rule 162 and in Schedule 3 by 2.92 per cent, was inserted into the Bankruptcy Rules in 1993 and commenced on 1 June 1993.
The scale of costs is reviewed regularly by the Federal Costs Advisory Committee, and in its eleventh and twelfth reports, the Committee recommended increases in the scale amounting to 3.09 per cent and 2.75 per cent respectively. These recommended
increases are to be implemented by applying a multiplier to Schedule 3. Rule 2.1 implements the recommendations of the Committee.
Rule 2.1 omits current subrule 162(2B) and inserts a new subrule 162(2B) to increase the costs specified in rule 162 and in Schedule 3 by 9.01 per cent, being costs incurred on or after the commencement of new subrule 162(2B) which commenced on Gazettal.
Overview
The Bankruptcy Rules (Amendment) 1995 No. 251 was enacted to amend the costs that solicitors may charge in bankruptcy proceedings as prescribed by the Bankruptcy Act 1966. This amendment was made under the authority of the Minister for Justice, in accordance with subsection 315(1) of the Act, which empowers the Governor General to make rules necessary or convenient for the carrying out of the Act. The policy objective, as reflected in the explanatory statement, is to adjust the scale of costs in line with recommendations from the Federal Costs Advisory Committee to ensure that solicitors' fees remain current and reflective of economic conditions. The proposed rules increase the base costs by 9.01 per cent, replacing a previous increase of 2.92 per cent implemented in 1993. This amendment was intended to address the need for regular reviews and updates to the costs structure to maintain fairness and effectiveness within the bankruptcy process.
Scope and Application
The Bankruptcy Rules (Amendment) 1995 No. 251 applies to the scale of costs that solicitors may charge in bankruptcy matters as specified in the Bankruptcy Rules 1966. This amendment is made under subsection 315(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966, which allows the Governor General to make rules necessary or convenient to carry out the provisions of the Act. The amendment affects the costs outlined in Rule 162 and Schedule 3 by increasing them by 9.01 per cent. These new rates apply to costs incurred on or after the commencement of the amended subrule 162(2B), which was gazetted on the specified date. The amendment does not alter the scope of who or what the rules apply to, meaning it still pertains to solicitors involved in bankruptcy proceedings under the Act. The jurisdictional reach of this amendment is confined to the Commonwealth of Australia, as it is an amendment to the federal legislation. There are no exclusions, exemptions, or specific thresholds noted within the text of the amendment itself, although the applicability of these costs could be influenced by other provisions within the Bankruptcy Act 1966 or related regulations.
Key Provisions
The Bankruptcy Rules (Amendment) 1995 No. 251 amends the Bankruptcy Rules in accordance with the recommendations of the Federal Costs Advisory Committee. The primary amendment is found in Rule 1.1, which states that the Bankruptcy Rules are to be amended as outlined in these rules. Specifically, Rule 2.1 replaces subrule 162(2B) of Rule 162, which had previously increased the base costs by 2.92 per cent, with a new subrule that increases the costs by 9.01 per cent. This change applies to costs incurred on or after the commencement of the new subrule, which occurred upon gazettement.
The obligations under these amended rules require solicitors to charge and be allowed costs as specified in Schedule 3, which has been adjusted to reflect the new scale. This means that the amount of costs payable for various items in connection with bankruptcy matters is now higher. The changes are intended to align the costs with the recommendations made by the Federal Costs Advisory Committee, ensuring that they are fair and reflective of the current economic conditions. Solicitors must adhere to these new cost structures when representing clients in bankruptcy proceedings.
Failure to comply with these amended rules could potentially lead to disputes over the amount of costs charged and allowed. However, the Explanatory Statement does not detail specific offences, penalties, or consequences for breach. In general, under the Bankruptcy Act 1966, any misapplication of costs or failure to comply with the rules could be considered misconduct, which may result in legal action, disciplinary measures, or other penalties as deemed appropriate by the relevant authorities. It is important for solicitors to be aware of these changes to ensure compliance and avoid any potential repercussions.