Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2017L01591 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Prepared by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)

Banking Act 1959, section 11AF

Under subsection 11AF(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), APRA has the power to determine standards (prudential standards), in writing, in relation to prudential matters to be complied with by authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and authorised non-operating holding companies (authorised NOHCs). Under subsection 11AF(3) of the Act, APRA may, in writing, vary or revoke a prudential standard.

On 28 November 2017, APRA made Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017 (the instrument), which revokes Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital made under Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 1 of 2014 and determines a new Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital (APS 111).

The instrument commences on 1 January 2018.

  1.    Background

APRA’s mandate is to ensure the safety and soundness of prudentially regulated financial institutions so that they can meet their financial promises to depositors, policyholders and fund members within a stable, efficient and competitive financial system. A core element of APRA’s prudential framework is measuring the capital adequacy of ADIs to ensure they hold adequate capital to cover the risks arising from their activities.

APS 111 sets out, among other things, the criteria that capital instruments must have to qualify as regulatory capital. This framework is largely based on the internationally agreed prudential capital framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, known as Basel III.[1] APRA implemented the Basel III framework in 2013.

One criterion is that, to qualify as regulatory capital, Additional Tier 1 (AT1) and Tier 2 (T2) capital instruments must be able to be written off or convert into ordinary shares in particular circumstances. However, because mutually owned ADIs are unable to issue ordinary shares because of their corporate structure, their AT1 and T2 capital instruments could only be written off. APRA addressed this issue by introducing a new type of instrument, a mutual equity interest that shared most of the characteristics of ordinary shares and into which AT1 and T2 capital instruments could convert. This framework was implemented in 2014.

APRA also discussed with industry its intention to expand the mutual equity interest framework to facilitate direct issuance by mutually owned ADIs. In 2016, the Senate Economic References Committee report, Cooperative, Mutual and Member-owned Firms, recommended that APRA set a target date for the outcome of these discussions and to bring them to a timely conclusion. This report was reviewed by an independent facilitator who recommended that APRA give priority to consideration of amendments to its prudential standards to permit mutually owned ADIs to directly issue Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital instruments, a recommendation supported by the Government.[2] APRA’s finalisation of the revised mutual equity framework addresses these recommendations.

2.      Purpose and operation of the instrument

The purpose of the instrument is to revoke APS 111 and replace it with a new version of APS 111 that allows mutually owned ADIs to directly issue mutual equity interests by establishing criteria that must be met for these instruments to be eligible for inclusion in CET1 Capital. These measures are intended to give mutually owned ADIs greater flexibility in their capital management without compromising their mutual corporate structure.

 

The criteria for mutual equity interests are based on the criteria for ordinary shares set out in Attachment B to APS 111, amended as appropriate for the issuance of a new type of capital instrument by a mutually owned ADI. Under these amendments:

  • the amount of mutual equity interests that may be eligible for inclusion in an ADI’s total CET1 Capital is limited to 25 per cent of CET1 Capital before applying regulatory adjustments. Any mutual equity interests on issue that exceed the limit for inclusion in CET1 Capital are eligible for inclusion in an ADI’s Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital;
  • distributions, in aggregate, on all mutual equity interests must not exceed 50 per cent of the issuing ADI’s net profit after tax for the financial year to which the distributions relate; and
  • an ADI must make specified disclosures in issue documentation and marketing material.

Other amendments to APS 111 are to:

  • remove references to the demutualisation provisions in the Corporations Act 2001 and related guidance issued by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), Regulatory Guide  147 Mutuality—Financial institutions[3];
  • make it clear that a reference to an Act, Regulation, prudential standard, Australian Accounting Standard issued by the Australian Accounting Standards Board or Australian Auditing and Assurance Standard issued by the Australian Auditing and Assurance Standards Board is a reference to the instrument as it exists from time to time. These instruments are available on the Federal Register of Legislation at www.legislation.gov.au;
  • remove out-of-date provisions in Attachment L Transitional arrangements for capital instruments;
  • make minor wording changes; and
  • update incorrect cross-references.

3.      Consultation

APRA consulted informally with industry and ASIC on its proposed amendments to the mutual equity interest framework. In July 2017, APRA commenced formal consultation on specific proposals with the release of its discussion paper Common Equity Tier 1 capital instruments for mutually owned ADIs and a draft revised APS 111.[4] APRA received eight submissions in response to this consultation from ADIs and industry associations.

Submissions were broadly supportive of the proposals to allow mutually owned ADIs to directly issue mutual equity interests. Respondents requested clarification or amendment regarding the limit on the amount of mutual equity interests that may be eligible for inclusion in an ADI’s CET1 Capital, the limit on distributions, prior approval requirements and disclosure requirements in regards to repurchase and redemption.

In November 2017, APRA released its response to submissions paper clarifying and outlining changes to its proposals in a number of areas following consideration of the issues raised in submissions.[5] The new version of APS 111 incorporates the policy changes made following consideration of the issues raised in submissions. 

4.  Regulation Impact Statement

In developing the revised mutual equity interest framework, APRA undertook a process and analysis equivalent to a Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS), which satisfies the Office of Best Practice Regulation’s requirements. The document evidencing APRA’s policy development process has been lodged as supporting material.

5. Statement of compatibility prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

A Statement of compatibility prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 is provided at Attachment A to this Explanatory Statement.


ATTACHMENT A

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017

The legislative instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instrument listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (HRPS Act).

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The purpose of the instrument is to revoke Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital determined by APRA in 2014 and replace it with a new Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital (the new APS 111).  

APS 111 sets out the characteristics that an instrument must have to qualify as regulatory capital for an authorised-deposit taking institution (ADI) and the various regulatory adjustments to be made to determine total regulatory capital for the ADI and its related companies. ADIs are body corporates that have been granted the authority, under the Banking Act 1959, to carry on banking business in Australia.

The new APS 111 introduces new provisions that allow ADIs with a mutual corporate structure (credit unions, building societies and mutual banks) to issue capital instruments (mutual equity interests) that qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1), the highest form of regulatory capital. These measures are intended to give mutually owned ADIs greater flexibility in their capital management without compromising their mutual corporate structure.

Further minor changes have been made to clarify wording and update incorrect cross-references.

Human rights implications

APRA has assessed the instrument and is of the view that it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the HRPS Act. Accordingly, in APRA’s assessment, the instrument is compatible with human rights.

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.

[1] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel III: A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems, December 2010 (revised June 2011) (Basel III) http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs189.htm

[2] The Senate Committee’s report is available at: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Cooperatives/Report, the report of the independent facilitator, Mr Greg Hammond, is available at: https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p2017-t235882/ and the Government’s response is available at: https://treasury.gov.au/publication/p2017-t235692/

[3] ASIC’s RG 147 is available at: http://asic.gov.au/regulatory-resources/find-a-document/regulatory-guides/rg-147-mutuality-financial-institutions/

[4] The discussion paper is available at: http://apra.gov.au/adi/PrudentialFramework/Pages/Consultation-CET1-Instruments-for-mutually-owned-ADIs-July-2017.aspx

[5] The response to submissions paper is available at: http://apra.gov.au/adi/PrudentialFramework/Pages/Response-CET1-instruments-for-mutually-owned-ADIs-November-2017.aspx

Overview

The Banking (Prudential Standard) Determination No. 4 of 2017 was enacted by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to address a gap in the regulatory framework concerning the capital adequacy of authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) with a mutual corporate structure. This determination was introduced under the Banking Act 1959, which empowers APRA to establish prudential standards for ADIs. The primary objective of this legislation is to revise Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital to enable mutually owned ADIs to issue capital instruments, specifically mutual equity interests, that qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital. This change aims to provide these institutions with greater flexibility in managing their capital while preserving their unique mutual corporate structure. The determination revokes the previous APS 111 issued in 2014 and introduces a new version to incorporate these enhancements, effective from 1 January 2018.

Scope and Application

The Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017 applies to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and authorised non-operating holding companies (authorised NOHCs) within Australia. These entities are subject to the regulations set out in the Banking Act 1959, and the Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital is designed to ensure that these institutions maintain adequate capital to cover the risks inherent in their activities. The standards set by the Prudential Standard APS 111 are essential for maintaining the financial stability and integrity of the Australian banking sector. The instrument, which revokes the previous Prudential Standard APS 111 and introduces a new version, aims to provide greater flexibility to mutually owned ADIs in their capital management while preserving their mutual corporate structure. This change allows these institutions to issue mutual equity interests that qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 Capital (CET1). The new standard also includes criteria for the amount of mutual equity interests that can be included in an ADI's CET1 Capital, limits on distributions, and specific disclosure requirements. The instrument is applicable nationally, aligning with the overarching goal of ensuring the safety and soundness of the banking system in Australia.

Key Provisions

Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 4 of 2017, made under the Banking Act 1959, revokes the previous Prudential Standard APS 111 Capital Adequacy: Measurement of Capital and establishes a new version, APS 111. The new APS 111 (sections 1-4) introduces criteria allowing authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) with a mutual corporate structure, such as credit unions, building societies, and mutual banks, to issue capital instruments (mutual equity interests) that qualify as Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) Capital, the highest form of regulatory capital. These provisions aim to provide greater flexibility in capital management for mutually owned ADIs without compromising their mutual corporate structure. Additionally, the new APS 111 includes criteria for mutual equity interests, such as a limit of 25% of CET1 Capital for inclusion, and requires adherence to distribution limits and disclosure requirements. The Act imposes specific obligations on the parties governed by it. Authorised deposit-taking institutions must ensure their capital instruments meet the criteria set out in the new APS 111, including the specified limits and disclosure requirements. Furthermore, these institutions must maintain adequate capital to cover risks arising from their activities, as mandated by the Act. The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is responsible for monitoring compliance with these standards and ensuring the safety and soundness of prudentially regulated financial institutions. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act and the new APS 111 may result in significant consequences. The Act does not explicitly outline specific penalties or consequences for non-compliance with the prudential standards, but breaches may lead to regulatory action by APRA, including enforcement actions, financial penalties, or other measures deemed necessary to ensure compliance. Additionally, APRA may impose administrative penalties or other regulatory sanctions as permitted by the Act and relevant regulations. It is essential for ADIs to adhere to the requirements to avoid potential legal and financial repercussions.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Finance & Banking Law
Instrument
Statutory Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Regulatory Standards
Compliance Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.