Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015 - Prudential Standard APS 330 - Public Disclosure

Administered by Department of the Treasury

Legislation au F2015L01177 Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

Prepared by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA)

Banking Act 1959, section 11AF

Under subsection 11AF(1) of the Banking Act 1959 (the Act), APRA has the power to determine standards (prudential standards), in writing, in relation to prudential matters to be complied with by authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and authorised non-operating holding companies (authorised NOHCs). Under subsection 11AF(3) of the Act, APRA may, in writing, vary or revoke a prudential standard.

On 20 July 2015, APRA made the following determination (the instrument):

  • Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015, which revokes Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 2 of 2015, including Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (APS 330) made under that determination, and determines a new Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (new APS 330).

The instrument commences on 1 August 2015.

1. Background

In May 2015, APRA determined APS 330 under Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 2 of 2015. APS 330 incorporated new disclosure requirements in relation to the leverage ratio, liquidity coverage ratio and the identification of potential global systemically important banks. APS 330 took effect on 1 July 2015.

APRA has become aware that some text was inadvertently omitted from paragraph 21(b) of APS 330. This text relates to the definition of material risk-taker for the purposes of the remuneration disclosure requirements in Attachment G to APS 330.

APRA is revoking APS 330 and determining new APS 330 to correct this omission.

2. Purpose and operation of the instrument

The purpose of the instrument is to revoke APS 330 and replace it with the new APS 330.

The new APS 330 is the same in substance as APS 330 but corrects an omission in paragraph 21(b), which relates to the definition of material risk-taker for the purposes of the remuneration disclosure requirements in Attachment G to APS 330.

3. Consultation

The change with respect to the definition of ‘material risk-taker’ has not been subject to public consultation as it is consistent with, and gives effect to, APRA’s previously consulted upon position.

4. Regulation Impact Statement

The Office of Best Practice Regulation has confirmed that a Regulation Impact Statement is not required.

5. Statement of compatibility prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

A Statement of Compatibility prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 is provided at Attachment A to this Explanatory Statement.


ATTACHMENT A

Statement of Compatibility with Human Rights

Prepared in accordance with Part 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011

Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015

The instrument is compatible with the human rights and freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011 (HRPS Act).

Overview of the Legislative Instrument

The purpose of the instrument is to revoke Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (APS 330) determined by APRA in May 2015 and replace it with a new Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (new APS 330). New APS 330 rectifies an omission in APS 330 with respect to the definition of ‘material risk-taker’ for the purposes of APRA’s remuneration disclosure requirements.

Human rights implications

APRA has assessed the instrument and is of the view that it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms recognised or declared in the international instruments listed in section 3 of the HRPS Act. Accordingly, in APRA’s assessment, the instrument is compatible with human rights.

Conclusion

The instrument is compatible with human rights as it does not raise any human rights issues.


 

 

Overview

The Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015 was enacted by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) under the Banking Act 1959. This determination was introduced to address a technical error in the previously enacted Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (APS 330), which inadvertently omitted certain text relating to the definition of ‘material risk-taker’ for the purposes of remuneration disclosure requirements. APRA’s role in regulating authorised deposit-taking institutions and authorised non-operating holding companies involves setting and enforcing prudential standards to ensure financial stability. The objective of this determination was to correct the inadvertent omission and maintain the integrity of the regulatory framework by issuing a revised Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (new APS 330).

Scope and Application

The Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015, issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) under the Banking Act 1959, pertains specifically to authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and authorised non-operating holding companies (authorised NOHCs). This instrument revokes the previous Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure and introduces a new version to correct an inadvertent omission in the definition of 'material risk-taker' as it pertains to remuneration disclosure requirements. The new Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure, which commenced on 1 August 2015, aims to rectify the omission in the previously issued standard without altering its substantive requirements. The Act applies to entities within the Commonwealth of Australia, ensuring that financial institutions maintain prudential standards that safeguard the stability of the financial system. The new APS 330 is designed to ensure consistent and clear communication of critical financial metrics, including leverage ratio and liquidity coverage ratio, and to properly identify potential global systemically important banks.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015 involve the revocation of the previous Prudential Standard APS 330 Public Disclosure (APS 330) made in May 2015 and the introduction of a new APS 330 (sections 1 and 2). This new standard is substantively identical to the original, but it corrects an inadvertent omission in paragraph 21(b) concerning the definition of 'material risk-taker' in the context of remuneration disclosure requirements in Attachment G to APS 330. This determination comes into effect on 1 August 2015. The obligations imposed by this Act on authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) and authorised non-operating holding companies (authorised NOHCs) primarily revolve around the accurate and timely disclosure of certain financial metrics and risk-related information. Under the new APS 330, these entities must ensure that their public disclosures concerning leverage ratios, liquidity coverage ratios, and the identification of potential global systemically important banks are precise and complete. This includes adhering to the corrected definition of 'material risk-taker' as specified in the new APS 330. Failure to comply with these disclosure requirements can have significant regulatory and reputational consequences for the ADIs and NOHCs. The Banking (prudential standard) determination No. 3 of 2015 does not explicitly outline specific offences or penalties for non-compliance with the new APS 330. However, breaches of prudential standards under the Banking Act 1959 can lead to various enforcement actions by APRA. These may include issuing directions, imposing administrative penalties, and in severe cases, recommending the removal of directors or senior managers. While the determination itself does not state maximum penalties, the broader legislative framework allows for significant financial penalties and other regulatory sanctions for non-compliance with prudential standards. The determination also includes a Statement of Compatibility prepared under the Human Rights (Parliamentary Scrutiny) Act 2011, affirming that the new APS 330 does not adversely affect any human rights recognised in the international instruments listed in that Act. APRA has assessed that the instrument is compatible with human rights, as it does not engage any of the applicable rights or freedoms. This statement underscores the regulatory authority's commitment to ensuring that its standards do not infringe on fundamental human rights.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Finance & Banking Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Regulatory Standards

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.