STATUTORY RULES.
1952. No. 92.
REGULATION UNDER THE BANKING ACT 1945.*
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Banking Act 1945.
Dated this ninth day of October, 1952.
W. J. McKELL
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
Treasurer.
AMENDMENT OF THE BANKING (GOLD) REGULATIONS.†
The Schedule.
The Schedule to the Banking (Gold) Regulations is amended by omitting the words—
“The Union Bank of Australia Limited;
The Bank of Australasia;
The Queensland National Bank Limited;”.
* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on , 1952.
† Statutory Rules 1946, No. 190, as amended by Statutory Rules 1947, No. 63; 1948, No. 154; and 1951, No. 112.
By Authority: L. F. JOHNSTON, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.
2972.—Price 3D. 9/11.7.1952.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1952 No. 92, made under the Banking Act 1945, addresses a gap in the regulatory framework concerning the management of gold reserves by authorised deposit-taking institutions. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, these regulations were intended to streamline the administration of gold regulations by removing the specific listing of certain banks from the purview of the Banking (Gold) Regulations. This amendment reflects a policy objective to simplify and update the regulatory environment, ensuring it remains relevant and efficient in response to the evolving banking landscape. The regulations were designed to provide flexibility and adaptability to the banking sector while maintaining oversight over gold reserves.
Scope and Application
The Banking (Gold) Regulations, as amended by Statutory Rules 1952, No. 92, apply to the entities previously specified in the Schedule, including The Union Bank of Australia Limited, The Bank of Australasia, and The Queensland National Bank Limited. These amendments, under the overarching Banking Act 1945, specifically address the regulation of gold within the banking sector in Australia. The application of these regulations is confined to the Commonwealth level, impacting financial institutions and their handling of gold across Australia. The amendments involve the removal of specific entities from the regulatory purview, potentially reflecting changes in the banking landscape or the consolidation of banking entities. The regulations extend their reach to ensure compliance with national banking standards concerning gold transactions and holdings, thereby maintaining financial integrity and regulatory oversight across the banking industry.
Key Provisions
The Banking (Gold) Regulations 1952, as amended by Statutory Rules 1946, No. 190, and further modified by Statutory Rules 1947, No. 63; 1948, No. 154; and 1951, No. 112, make specific amendments to the existing regulations concerning gold holdings by financial institutions (Schedule). The primary amendment is the removal of certain banks from the list of institutions that are subject to the regulations on gold holdings. Specifically, the Union Bank of Australia Limited, the Bank of Australasia, and the Queensland National Bank Limited are omitted from the list in the Schedule (Schedule).
These amendments impose updated obligations on the remaining entities governed by the regulations. They require adherence to the specified gold holding requirements as outlined in the remaining parts of the Schedule, ensuring that only the named banks are subject to these particular regulatory stipulations. For any financial institution affected by this amendment, the primary obligation is to comply with the remaining regulations that govern gold holdings, ensuring that the mandated gold reserves are correctly maintained and reported as per the regulations.
Breach of these regulations could result in significant consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the legislative instrument itself, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance with the Banking Act 1945 and its regulations could lead to enforcement actions by the relevant authorities. Typically, such breaches may result in fines, legal action, or other administrative penalties as deemed appropriate by the courts or regulatory bodies overseeing banking practices. The maximum penalties would depend on the severity and nature of the breach, in line with the overarching provisions of the Banking Act 1945.