Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984

Overview

The Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 was enacted to address the need for modifying the bounty period specified in the Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Act 1977. This amendment was necessitated to better align with the evolving technological landscape and economic conditions of the time. The Act was passed by the Queen, in and with the advice and consent of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, thereby ensuring its legislative authority and validity. The primary objective of this amendment was to adjust the period during which the bounty for the acquisition of automatic data processing equipment could be claimed, reflecting a policy intent to support technological advancement within specified timeframes.

Scope and Application

The Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 amends section 4 of the Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Act 1977. This legislation applies to the bounty paid for automatic data processing equipment, which pertains to entities and individuals involved in the acquisition of such equipment within the specified period. The Act applies on a Commonwealth level, impacting entities and individuals across Australia. The geographic reach of this Act is nationwide, ensuring uniformity in the bounty payment period across all states and territories. The Act modifies the periods during which the bounty is payable, specifically adjusting the dates from which the bounty was applicable. There are no explicit exclusions or exemptions mentioned in the text, and the amendment directly alters the Principal Act without reference to subordinate instruments extending or restricting its application. This amendment ensures that the bounty is only applicable to the period commencing on 29 March 1982 and ending on 5 July 1984, effectively clarifying the eligibility timeframe for the bounty.

Key Provisions

The Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Amendment Act (No. 2) 1984 amends section 4 of the Automatic Data Processing Equipment Bounty Act 1977. Specifically, it modifies the period during which a bounty is payable for automatic data processing equipment. The amendment replaces the previous period mentioned in the Principal Act with a new period starting on 29 March 1982 and ending on 5 July 1984. This change effectively adjusts the eligibility criteria for the bounty, ensuring that only purchases made within this specific timeframe qualify for the financial incentive. Under the amended Act, entities or individuals purchasing automatic data processing equipment during the specified period are eligible to receive the bounty. To qualify, they must adhere to the conditions and requirements outlined in the Principal Act, which may include documentation, proof of purchase, and compliance with other stipulated criteria. The bounty is intended to encourage the adoption of advanced data processing technologies by providing a financial incentive that offsets part of the purchase cost. The Act imposes several obligations on the parties it governs. Firstly, they must ensure that any claim for the bounty is made within the stipulated time frame and is supported by the necessary documentation. This includes maintaining records of the purchase and any other relevant transactions. Secondly, the claimants must comply with the terms and conditions of the bounty as set out in the Principal Act, which may involve meeting certain eligibility criteria and adhering to specific guidelines for claiming the bounty. Failure to meet these obligations could result in the denial of the bounty claim. There are potential consequences for non-compliance with the provisions of the Act. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the text provided, breaches of legislative requirements can typically result in civil or criminal penalties. For civil consequences, the Act may allow for the recovery of improperly paid bounties, with interest. Criminal penalties could include fines or, in severe cases, imprisonment. However, the exact penalties would need to be determined based on the broader legal framework and any relevant case law or regulations that apply to the administration of this Act.