Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Amendment Orders 2004 (No. 2)
I, JOHN MENDOZA, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Sports Drug Agency, make these Orders under regulation 7 of the Australian Sports Drug Agency Regulations 1999.
Dated 5 August 2004
JOHN MENDOZA
Chief Executive Officer
1 Name of Orders
These Orders are the Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Amendment Orders 2004 (No. 2).
2 Commencement
These Orders commence on the date of their notification in the Gazette.
3 Amendment of Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Orders 1999
Schedule 1 amends the Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Orders 1999.
Schedule 1 Amendment
(section 3)
[1] Section 62
omit
32 and 33,
insert
32, 33 and 86A,
Overview
The Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Amendment Orders 2004 (No. 2) were enacted to address specific gaps within the Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Orders 1999. These amendments were made under the authority of regulation 7 of the Australian Sports Drug Agency Regulations 1999 by the Chief Executive Officer, John Mendoza, on 5 August 2004. The primary objective of these Orders, as stated in the text, is to modify the existing drug testing scheme to enhance its effectiveness and comprehensiveness. The Orders came into effect on the date of their notification in the Gazette and include amendments outlined in Schedule 1, which primarily focus on updating and expanding the existing sections to incorporate new provisions such as sections 32, 33, and 86A. The enacting body, the Australian Sports Drug Agency, aimed to ensure that the drug testing regime remains robust and capable of adapting to new challenges in sports drug regulation.
Scope and Application
The Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Amendment Orders 2004 (No. 2) apply to individuals and entities involved in the conduct and management of sports within Australia. These Orders pertain specifically to the amendment of the Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Orders 1999, thereby affecting athletes, sports organisations, and administrators who are subject to drug testing under the scheme. The geographic reach of these Orders is national, as they are promulgated under the authority of the Australian Sports Drug Agency, which operates at the Commonwealth level. These Orders do not specify any exclusions or exemptions, implying that all individuals and entities covered by the original 1999 Orders remain subject to the amended provisions. The Orders extend their application through subordinate instruments by amending the original Scheme A Orders, thereby incorporating new sections and omitting others as detailed in Schedule 1.
Key Provisions
The Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Amendment Orders 2004 (No. 2) primarily modify the Australian Sports Drug Agency Drug Testing (Scheme A) Orders 1999. The amendments introduce new sections and alter existing ones to update the drug testing scheme (Schedule 1, Amendment). Section 62, for instance, now includes sections 32, 33, and 86A, replacing the previous sections 32 and 33.
These Orders impose specific obligations on parties subject to the drug testing scheme, including athletes and sports organisations. They must comply with the updated testing procedures and requirements outlined in the amended Orders. This includes providing necessary information, samples, and cooperation with the Australian Sports Drug Agency in the testing process. The obligations also extend to ensuring that athletes and team members are informed of their responsibilities and the consequences of non-compliance.
Failure to comply with the requirements of these Orders can lead to various consequences. For instance, athletes found to be in violation of the drug testing provisions may face disciplinary action from their respective sports organisations, including suspensions or bans from competition. Additionally, under the Australian Sports Drug Agency Regulations 1999, there may be penalties imposed by the agency itself. The maximum penalties for breaches can include fines and further sanctions, as stipulated in the relevant regulations. It is crucial for all parties to adhere to the updated provisions to avoid these repercussions.