STATUTORY RULES.
1927. No. 110.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN SOLDIERS’ REPATRIATION ACT 1920-1922.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1922, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-eighth day of September, 1927.
STONEHAVEN,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
NEVILLE HOWSE,
Minister in Charge of Repatriation.
Amendment of Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations.
(Statutory Rules 1925, No. 110, as amended to this date.)
After Regulation 192 of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations, the following regulation is inserted:—
192a. All moneys vested in or held by the Commission subject to any trust, and any income received therefrom, may, until disposition in accordance with the trust, be invested by the Commission—
“(a) in securities of the Commonwealth;
(b) in securities of the States;
(c) in loans to local governing bodies in Australia;
(d) upon mortgage of land in Australia of an estate of inheritance in fee simple or on mortgage of leasehold interests in such land; or
(e) in any other manner for the time being allowed by any Act or State Act for the investment of trust funds in Australia; or
(f) may be lodged by the Commission at call or on fixed deposit, or partly at call or partly on fixed deposit, with the Commonwealth Bank.”
By Authority: H. J. Green, Government Printer, Canberra.
797.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1927, No. 110, under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1922, were enacted by the Governor-General in Council to amend the existing Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations. These regulations were introduced to address the need for more flexible investment options for the funds held by the Repatriation Commission in trust for the benefit of returned soldiers and their dependants. This legislative instrument was intended to ensure that the Commission could manage and grow these funds efficiently, thereby securing the financial future of those who had served the nation. The policy objective is to provide a secure and stable financial environment for the administration of repatriation benefits, which was an essential step in fulfilling the Commonwealth's commitment to support veterans and their families.
Scope and Application
The Australian Soldiers' Repatriation Regulations, established under the Australian Soldiers' Repatriation Act 1920-1922, govern the administration and financial management of funds held by the Repatriation Commission. These regulations apply specifically to the Commission, which is tasked with the responsibility of managing and investing the funds intended for the repatriation and welfare of Australian soldiers. The geographic scope of these regulations is national, as they pertain to the investment of funds across various Australian jurisdictions, including federal, state, and local government securities and loans, as well as real estate within Australia. The regulations allow for flexibility in the investment of trust funds, encompassing securities, mortgages, and deposits within authorised financial institutions like the Commonwealth Bank. This broad scope ensures that the Commission can prudently manage and grow the funds to better support the intended beneficiaries, which are Australian soldiers and their families. The inclusion of specific investment avenues, such as Commonwealth and state securities, ensures a diversified approach to fund management within the constraints of Australian law.
Key Provisions
The main operative section of these Regulations, introduced under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1922, is regulation 192a (1). This regulation allows the Commission to invest funds held by it, under any trust, in various forms of securities or loans. Specifically, the Commission can invest in Commonwealth or State securities (192a(a), (b)), loans to local governing bodies in Australia (192a(c)), mortgages of land in Australia (192a(d)), or in any other manner permitted by any Act or State Act for the investment of trust funds in Australia (192a(e)). Furthermore, the funds can be lodged at call or on fixed deposit, or partly at call or partly on fixed deposit, with the Commonwealth Bank (192a(f)).
The Regulations impose several obligations and requirements on the parties involved. Firstly, the Commission must ensure that any investments made with the trust funds comply with the prescribed methods and forms of investment outlined in regulation 192a. This includes adhering to the types of securities, loans, mortgages, or deposits specified. Secondly, the Commission must maintain proper records and documentation of these investments to ensure transparency and accountability. This ensures that the funds are managed in a manner consistent with the trust and the overall objectives of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act.
Failure to comply with the provisions of these Regulations could lead to various consequences. While the Regulations themselves do not explicitly state specific offences or penalties for non-compliance, breaches of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act or associated regulations may result in civil or criminal liabilities. Under the Act, penalties for breaches could include fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity and nature of the breach. The maximum penalties would be determined by the courts based on the specific circumstances of the case and applicable laws at the time of the breach.
In summary, regulation 192a of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations permits the Commission to invest trust funds in a variety of approved financial instruments and deposits. It imposes obligations on the Commission to ensure compliance with these investment methods and to maintain accurate records of such investments. Non-compliance with these provisions could lead to civil or criminal penalties under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act, with the exact penalties depending on the nature and severity of the breach.