STATUTORY RULES.
1922. No. 55.
REGULATION UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN SOLDIERS’ REPATRIATION ACT 1920-1921.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1921 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twelfth day of April, 1922.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. D. MILLEN,
Minister of State for Repatriation.
Amendment of Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920.
(Statutory Rules 1920, No. 112, as amended to this date.)
Regulation 191b of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations is amended by deleting the words, “or whilst he is a patient in a Red Cross Institution to which he has been sent under agreement with the Department” and inserting in their stead the words, “or while he is a patient in any institution or hospital to which he has been sent under arrangement with the Department or in which the cost of his treatment and maintenance while therein is paid by the Department.”
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1921 was enacted to address the needs of soldiers who were returned from service and required medical treatment and support. The Act was introduced to ensure that those who had served their country were properly cared for upon their return, with a focus on repatriating soldiers and providing them with the necessary rehabilitation and ongoing support. The Australian Government, through the Governor-General in Council, has issued Statutory Rules in 1922 to amend the Australian Soldiers' Repatriation Regulations, aiming to refine the administrative processes and ensure that the benefits of the Act are effectively delivered to the soldiers. The underlying policy objective is to maintain and enhance the welfare of returned soldiers by providing them with comprehensive care and support as stipulated in the Act.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules of 1922, No. 55, represent a regulation under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920-1921, and serve to amend the existing Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920. The regulation applies to soldiers who have been repatriated under the Act and are receiving treatment in institutions or hospitals. The amendment specifically alters Regulation 191b, broadening the scope of institutions eligible for Department reimbursement, thus extending the Act’s provisions to any institution or hospital where the cost of treatment and maintenance is covered by the Department. This change effectively ensures that the Act applies to a wider range of healthcare facilities, thereby offering more comprehensive coverage to soldiers in need of medical care. The regulation, enacted by the Governor-General in the capacity of the Commonwealth of Australia, has immediate effect and encompasses all territories under the Commonwealth jurisdiction. There are no stated exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds within the regulation itself, although the overarching Act may contain such provisions. This legislative instrument demonstrates the Commonwealth’s commitment to adapting and extending support structures for soldiers in alignment with evolving healthcare landscapes.
Key Provisions
The key provision of this legislative instrument is the amendment of Regulation 191b of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920 (Regulation 1). This regulation modifies the conditions under which a soldier is considered to be receiving care and treatment under the Act. Specifically, it changes the phrasing to include any institution or hospital to which the soldier has been sent under an arrangement with the Department or in which the cost of their treatment and maintenance is paid by the Department, instead of limiting it to Red Cross Institutions.
The obligation imposed by this amendment is that the Department of Repatriation must now ensure that any institution or hospital providing treatment to soldiers under their care is covered under the agreement or cost arrangement specified in the regulation. This means that the Department must have formal arrangements in place with these institutions to ensure the treatment and maintenance costs are covered, and the soldier is receiving appropriate care under the Act.
In terms of consequences for non-compliance, the Act does not explicitly state offences or penalties for breaching this regulation. However, failure to adhere to the specified arrangements could potentially lead to disputes over the coverage and costs of treatment, which may result in legal challenges or administrative reviews. The overarching goal is to ensure that soldiers receive the care they are entitled to under the Act, and any failure to comply with the regulatory requirements could undermine this objective.
Additionally, while not explicitly stated in the text, the implications of not maintaining proper arrangements could extend to potential audits or investigations by oversight bodies to ensure compliance with the Act. If found to be in breach, institutions or the Department could face reputational damage or financial repercussions, although the specific penalties would depend on the nature and severity of the non-compliance.
Overall, the amendment aims to streamline the process of ensuring that soldiers receive necessary care and treatment by broadening the scope of eligible institutions, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of the Act.