STATUTORY RULES.
1920. No. 151.
————
REGULATIONS UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN SOLDIERS’ REPATRIATION ACT 1920.
I, SIR WILLIAM HILL IRVINE, the Deputy of the Governor-General in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following regulations under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this first day of September, 1920.
W. H. IRVINE,
Deputy of the Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. D. MILLEN,
Minister of State for Repatriation.
——
Amendment of Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920.
(Statutory Rules 1920, No. 112, as amended by Statutory Rules 1920, No. 125.)
1. Regulation 183 of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920 is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (1) thereof the word “his,” and inserting in its stead the word “its.”
2. Regulation 92 of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920 is amended by adding after the word “soldier” in sub-regulation (6) thereof the following words:—
“or in the case of a widow within two years after the date of the notification of the death of her husband”.
Binding of proof of lawful consent or excuse on accused.
3. After Regulation 195 of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920 the following regulation is inserted:—
“195a. Where under these Regulations any act if done without lawful consent or without lawful excuse is an offence against these Regulations, the burden of proving that the act was done with lawful consent shall rest on the person accused.”
4. Form E. of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920 is deleted, and the following Form substituted in its stead:—
FORM E.
Register of Securities.
Securities. | Person Giving Security. | Amount Secured. |
No. | Date. | Nature of Security. | Regtl. No. | Rank. | Unit. | Name in full. | Address. | Occupation. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Rate of Interest Payable. | Repayment. | Property over which Security Given. | Remarks. | Security Discharged. |
Instalments due. Monthly, &c. | Amount. | Repayable by. | Extended to. | Description of. | Where situated. | Date of Discharge. | Manner of Discharge. |
| | | | | | | | | |
|
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
Overview
The Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920, introduced by the Commonwealth Parliament, were enacted to provide for the implementation of the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920. This legislative instrument aims to address the needs of soldiers and their families by ensuring that they receive adequate care, benefits, and support after their service. The policy objective is to provide a comprehensive framework that includes medical care, financial assistance, and rehabilitation services, reflecting the government's commitment to repatriating and supporting those who have served in the military. These regulations serve to operationalise the overarching Act by providing detailed procedural and administrative guidelines necessary for its effective implementation.
Scope and Application
The Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920, as amended by Statutory Rules 1920, No. 151, apply to individuals and entities involved in the repatriation of Australian soldiers, specifically focusing on the administrative and procedural aspects of such repatriations. These regulations are implemented under the Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920, extending their reach across the Commonwealth of Australia. The regulations primarily concern the rights and responsibilities of soldiers, their families, and the relevant authorities in the repatriation process, ensuring lawful consent and excuse are adequately addressed in any legal proceedings. Specific amendments include changes to the burden of proof for acts done without lawful consent or excuse, and the introduction of new forms to better manage securities and registrations related to repatriation. The regulations also make adjustments to existing forms and sub-regulations, reflecting the evolving needs of the repatriation process.
Key Provisions
The Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Regulations 1920, as amended by Statutory Rules 1920, No. 151, introduce several key changes to the existing regulations. Regulation 183(1) is amended to replace the word "his" with "its," which appears to correct a grammatical error without altering the substantive meaning of the regulation. Regulation 92 is further amended to include provisions regarding the timeframe for widows to make claims, stipulating that they must do so within two years from the date of notification of their husband’s death. This addition ensures that widows have a clear timeframe within which to submit their claims. Additionally, Regulation 195a introduces a new rule where the burden of proof for lawful consent or excuse for any act deemed an offence under these regulations lies with the accused. This shifts the onus from the regulator to the individual accused of committing the offence to demonstrate that their actions were lawful.
These regulations impose specific obligations on the parties they govern. For instance, widows of deceased soldiers must ensure they submit their claims within the stipulated two-year period from the date of notification of their husband's death, as per the amendment to Regulation 92. Furthermore, individuals accused of committing acts without lawful consent or excuse under these regulations must bear the burden of proving their actions were lawful, as outlined in Regulation 195a. This regulatory framework aims to streamline the claims process and ensure accountability among the parties involved.
Failure to comply with these regulations can result in various legal consequences. While the statutory rules do not explicitly detail penalties for non-compliance, breaches of these regulations could potentially lead to civil or criminal liabilities under the broader Australian Soldiers’ Repatriation Act 1920. The specific penalties for such breaches would typically depend on the nature and severity of the offence, as well as any relevant provisions within the overarching Act. However, the amendments and clarifications introduced by these regulations serve to underscore the importance of adherence to the stipulated timelines and legal requirements.