STATUTORY RULES.
1924. No. 180.
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1918.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this twenty-sixth day of November, 1924.
FORSTER,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
E. K. BOWDEN,
Minister of State for Defence.
Australian Military Regulations 1916.
(Statutory Rules 1916, No. 166, as amended to this date.)
Amendments.
A. Sub-regulation (2) of regulation 52a is amended by:
(a) re-lettering paragraph “(g)” thereof to be “(h)”, and
(b) inserting the following paragraph next after paragraph “(f)”—
(g) Members allotted for duty or attending for instruction at a school or course of instruction—the chief instructor at the school or course if appointed for that purpose by the Adjutant-General or a formation, &c., commander”.
B. Regulation 468 is repealed and the following regulation substituted:
“468. For purposes of discipline the C.O. of members of the Army Service Corps (Permanent), including the Remount Service, shall, when no C.O. has been appointed, be the senior officer of the Permanent Forces on the staff of the District Base Head-quarters who is performing the duties of the Adjutant-General’s branch at those head-quarters”.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by H. J. Green, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.17823.—Price 3d.
Overview
Statutory Rules 1924 No. 180, Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918, were enacted by the Governor-General in Council, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive, to make amendments to the Australian Military Regulations 1916. This legislative instrument addresses issues related to the command structure and disciplinary oversight within the Army Service Corps, aiming to clarify roles and responsibilities in the absence of specific commanding officers. The objective, as stated in the regulations, is to ensure that military discipline and the operational effectiveness of training institutions are maintained through the appointment of appropriate commanding officers or their equivalents. The amendments are intended to streamline the chain of command and provide clear directives on who holds disciplinary authority within the Army Service Corps under certain conditions.
Scope and Application
The Australian Military Regulations 1916, as amended, apply to members of the Australian Defence Force and their conduct in the execution of their duties. The regulations are made under the Defence Act 1903-1918 and cover various aspects of military discipline, administration, and operations. They establish the legal framework for the governance and management of military personnel and activities, including the designation of commanding officers and instructors, the enforcement of discipline, and the procedures for managing military property and conduct during operations. The regulations apply on a national level throughout the Commonwealth of Australia and are subject to amendment by subordinate instruments, as evidenced by the specific amendments outlined in the statutory rules. The application of these regulations is comprehensive, affecting all members of the Defence Force, regardless of their rank or role, and ensuring uniformity in the enforcement of military law across the nation. The regulations do not specify exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds, implying that they are broadly applicable to all relevant personnel and circumstances within the scope of military operations and discipline.
Key Provisions
The Australian Military Regulations 1916, as amended, detail several key provisions. Section 52a(2) now includes an additional paragraph (h), which pertains to members allotted for duty or attending for instruction at a school or course of instruction. The chief instructor at such schools or courses, if appointed by the Adjutant-General or a formation commander, is now responsible for these members. This addition enhances the oversight and management of training and instructional activities within the military. Regulation 468 has been replaced to clarify the disciplinary chain of command for members of the Army Service Corps (Permanent), including the Remount Service. According to this new regulation, when no Commanding Officer (C.O.) has been appointed, the senior officer of the Permanent Forces on the staff of the District Base Headquarters, who is performing the duties of the Adjutant-General’s branch at those headquarters, will act as the C.O. This ensures a clear line of authority and accountability for discipline within these units.
The Act imposes specific obligations and requirements on military personnel and commanders. Members assigned to duty or attending for instruction must adhere to the directives and oversight of the chief instructor appointed by the relevant authority. This includes following the instructor's guidance on training protocols, schedules, and performance evaluations. Additionally, the senior officer designated under Regulation 468 must ensure that discipline within the Army Service Corps is maintained in accordance with military standards and procedures. This includes implementing and enforcing disciplinary measures when necessary, ensuring that all personnel are aware of their duties and responsibilities, and reporting any disciplinary issues to higher authorities as required.
Failure to comply with these provisions can result in significant consequences. While specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the legislative instrument, breaches of military regulations can typically lead to administrative, disciplinary, or legal actions. Such actions might include court-martial proceedings for serious violations, which can result in penalties ranging from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence. Additionally, non-compliance with training directives or disciplinary protocols can lead to administrative penalties, such as demotion, loss of privileges, or other corrective measures deemed appropriate by the commanding officer or higher authority. These consequences are intended to maintain order, discipline, and operational effectiveness within the military.