Statutory Rules
1979 No. 242
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 19031
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903.
Dated this seventh day of November 1979.
ZELMAN COWEN
Governor-General
By His Excellency’s Command,
J. E. McLEAY
Minister of State for Administrative Services for an on behalf of the
Minister of State for Defence
_______________
AMENDMENTS OF THE AUSTRALIAN MILITARY
REGULATIONS2
1 Review of convictions and sentences by a superior authority
Regulation 265 of the Australian Military Regulations is amended by adding at the end thereof the following sub-regulation:
“(5) Where a superior authority has reviewed a sentence under sub-regulation (3) or (4) and has substituted a less severe sentence for the sentence originally imposed, the less severe sentence has effect as if it had been imposed on the day on which the original sentence was imposed by the commanding officer.”.
2 Adaptation of section 57 of the Army Act
Regulation 344 of the Australian Military Regulations is amended by adding at the end thereof the following sub-regulation:
“(3) For the purpose of its application to the Army whether on war service or not, section 57 of the Army Act shall be read as if sub-section (5) were omitted and the following sub‑section substituted:
‘(5) The provisions of this Act with respect to an original sentence apply to a sentence imposed by way of mitigation, remission or commutation.’.”.
3 Authority to disclose
Regulation 770 of the Australian Military Regulations is amended by omitting from paragraph (d) of sub-regulation (1) “an officer” and substituting “a person”.
1. Notified in the Commonwealth of Australia Gazette on 14 November 1979.
2. Statutory Rules 1927 No. 149 as amended to date. For previous amendments see Note 2 to Statutory Rules 1979 No. 20 and see also Statutory Rules 1979 Nos. 20, 30, 169 and 170.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1979 No. 242, made under the Defence Act 1903, were enacted to amend the Australian Military Regulations and address certain gaps in military justice procedures. These amendments were introduced by the Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting on the advice of the Federal Executive Council. The primary aim of these regulations is to ensure that military sentences are reviewed and adapted in line with broader legal standards, providing a more balanced approach to military justice. The regulations modify the review process for sentences, clarify the application of certain sections of the Army Act, and expand the authority to disclose information, reflecting a policy objective to maintain fairness and effectiveness in military disciplinary actions.
Scope and Application
The Statutory Rules 1979 No. 242, made under the Defence Act 1903, amend the Australian Military Regulations to address specific aspects of military law and procedure. These regulations apply to all members of the Australian Defence Force, including regular and reserve personnel, as well as civilians employed by or under the control of the Defence Force. The amendments primarily affect the procedures for reviewing sentences, adapting the application of the Army Act, and the authority to disclose information. Geographically, these regulations have a national reach, applying across all states and territories within Australia, and they extend to all military operations, whether in peacetime or during war. The scope of these regulations is limited to the specific provisions outlined within the document, and they do not extend to civilian criminal law or other areas outside the Defence Act 1903. There are no specific exclusions or thresholds mentioned in the regulations, but they do provide detailed procedures for the application and interpretation of military justice within the Australian Defence Force.
Key Provisions
The Regulations under the Defence Act 1903, made under the authority of the Governor-General, introduce significant amendments to the Australian Military Regulations. These amendments primarily focus on the review of sentences by a superior authority, the adaptation of Army Act provisions, and the authority to disclose information. Firstly, Regulation 265 is amended to allow a superior authority to review a sentence and, if deemed necessary, substitute a less severe sentence. This substituted sentence is deemed to have been imposed on the original date of the commanding officer’s decision (Regulation 265(5)). Secondly, Regulation 344 modifies the application of section 57 of the Army Act, ensuring that the provisions regarding an original sentence apply equally to any sentence imposed by way of mitigation, remission, or commutation (Regulation 344(3)). Thirdly, Regulation 770 is amended to broaden the scope of those who can be the subject of disclosure, removing the limitation to officers and extending it to any person (Regulation 770(1)(d)).
The Regulations impose specific obligations on military personnel and authorities. Commanding officers are required to ensure that any sentences they impose are subject to review by a superior authority, who has the authority to substitute a less severe sentence if appropriate. This review process aims to ensure fairness and consistency in the application of military justice. Additionally, the adaptation of section 57 of the Army Act means that the application of the Act’s provisions to sentences imposed by way of mitigation, remission, or commutation must be consistent with those applied to original sentences. This ensures that the principles of justice and fairness are upheld in all sentencing decisions. Furthermore, the authority to disclose information is extended to any person, rather than just officers, which broadens the scope of who can be subject to disclosure and ensures that relevant information can be shared appropriately.
The Regulations include provisions that outline the consequences of non-compliance. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed within these amendments, general Defence Act provisions and other relevant military regulations would apply. Non-compliance with military justice procedures could result in administrative or disciplinary actions, including the possibility of further review and appeal processes. The potential penalties could range from reprimands to more severe disciplinary measures, depending on the nature and severity of the breach. These provisions underscore the importance of adhering to the stipulated procedures and the potential repercussions for failing to do so.