Australian Military Regulations (Amendment)

Administered by Department of Defence

Legislation au F1997B00153 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1964. No. 93.

 

REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1956.*

I, THE ADMINISTRATOR of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1956.

Dated this twenty third day of July, 1964.

E. W. WOODWARD

Administrator.

By His Excellency’s Command,

A. J. FORBES

Minister of State for the Army.

 

Amendments of the Australian Military Regulations.

1. Regulation 73 of the Australian Military Regulations is repealed and the following regulation inserted in its stead:—

Nationality of officers.

“73.—(1.) A person shall not be appointed an officer of the Military Forces unless he is a British subject or an Australian protected person.

“(2.) For the purposes of this regulation, ‘Australian protected person’ has the same meaning as in regulation 5 of the Citizenship Regulations.”.

Eligibility for promotion in Citizen Forces.

2. Regulation 88 of the Australian Military Regulations is amended by omitting sub-regulation (2.) and inserting in its stead the following sub-regulations:—

“(2.) An officer of the Citizen Military Forces, other than a C.O., is not eligible for promotion unless his C.O. certifies that he is in all respects fitted for promotion.

“(2a.) In giving a certificate under the last preceding sub-regulation, the C.O. shall not have regard to whether or not the officer has passed the appropriate examination for promotion to a higher rank.”.

Chaplains-General.

3. Regulation 595 of the Australian Military Regulations is amended by omitting from sub-regulation (4.) the words “, selected and appointed as Chaplain-General, United Churches, by the Governor-General” and inserting in their stead the words “appointed upon the recommendation of the body known as the Federal United Churches Chaplaincy Board”.

* Notified in the Commonwealth Gazette on 30th July, 1964.

† Statutory Rules 1927, No. 149 as amended to date. For previous amendments of the Australian Military Regulations see footnote † to Statutory Rules 1964, No. 62, and see also Statutory Rules 1964, Nos. 62 and 83.

 

By Authority: A. J. Arthur, Commonwealth Government Printer, Canberra.

7403/64. 9/18.6.1964

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1964 No. 93, made under the Defence Act 1903-1956, were introduced to amend certain regulations of the Australian Military Regulations, specifically targeting eligibility for officer appointments, promotion criteria within the Citizen Forces, and the appointment process for Chaplains-General. Enacted by the Administrator of the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia, with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, these regulations were designed to refine the administrative and operational framework governing the Australian Military Forces. The policy objective underpinning these amendments appears to be to ensure that military leadership and chaplaincy appointments are managed according to updated criteria that reflect both the evolving nature of military service and the administrative efficiency within the Defence forces.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules of 1964, No. 93, under the Defence Act 1903-1956, modify existing Australian Military Regulations to alter the criteria for officer appointments, eligibility for promotion within the Citizen Forces, and the appointment process for Chaplains-General. These regulations apply to individuals aspiring to or currently holding positions within the Military Forces, specifically affecting officers of the Citizen Military Forces and Chaplains-General. Geographically, these regulations have a national scope as they are enacted under the Commonwealth authority. Notably, the regulations exclude any provisions that may have been previously stipulated under the Australian Military Regulations, as they are repealed or amended to reflect the current legislative intent. The application and interpretation of these regulations can be further defined through subordinate instruments as necessary, ensuring that the legislative framework remains responsive to the evolving needs of the defence sector.

Key Provisions

The Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1956, made on July 23, 1964, introduce several key amendments to the Australian Military Regulations. Regulation 73 has been replaced to stipulate that only British subjects or Australian protected persons can be appointed as officers in the Military Forces (section 1). Regulation 88 has been amended to specify that officers in the Citizen Military Forces, excluding Commanding Officers, are not eligible for promotion unless their Commanding Officer certifies their fitness for promotion, irrespective of whether they have passed the relevant examination (section 2). Lastly, Regulation 595 has been modified to change the selection process for Chaplain-Generals, now appointed based on the recommendation of the Federal United Churches Chaplaincy Board instead of being selected and appointed by the Governor-General (section 3). The obligations under these Regulations require that any individual aspiring to be appointed as an officer in the Military Forces must meet the nationality criteria specified (section 1). Additionally, Commanding Officers are tasked with certifying the fitness of their subordinates for promotion, without considering examination results (section 2). The appointment of Chaplain-Generals now hinges on the recommendation of the Federal United Churches Chaplaincy Board, shifting the selection authority away from the Governor-General (section 3). These obligations ensure a structured and standardised approach to appointments and promotions within the Military Forces. Violations or non-compliance with these Regulations may not explicitly outline specific penalties within the provided text, but breaches of military regulations generally carry severe consequences, potentially including disciplinary actions, administrative penalties, or legal ramifications under broader military law. The absence of detailed penalties in this specific legislative instrument suggests that existing military law provisions would apply, which could include fines, imprisonment, or other disciplinary measures as deemed appropriate by military tribunals or courts.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Legislative Instrument
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.