Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment)

Legislation au C1918L00119 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1918. No. 119.

________

REGULATION UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1917.

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation under the Defence Act 1903-1917 to come into operation forthwith.

Dated this fifteenth day of May, 1918.

R. M. FERGUSON,

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

G. F. PEARCE,

Minister of State for Defence.

_________

Amendment of Australian Military Regulations 1916.

After regulation 480 of the Australian Military Regulations 1916 the following regulation is inserted:—

“480a. No officer shall use the title of his military rank in signing any document or correspondence other than documents or correspondence signed in connexion with his military duties.”

 

 

 

 

 

________________________________

Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1918, No. 119, constitutes a legislative instrument made under the Defence Act 1903-1917, intended to address issues related to the conduct and decorum of officers within the military context. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, the regulation was introduced to maintain a clear distinction between an officer's military duties and their personal or civilian activities. This regulation was specifically aimed at ensuring that officers do not use their military rank titles in personal or civilian documents and correspondence, thereby avoiding any confusion or misperception of authority in non-military contexts. The regulation was designed to uphold the integrity and professionalism of the military by clearly delineating the use of military titles within appropriate bounds.

Scope and Application

The Legislative instrument C1918L00119 pertains to an amendment of the Australian Military Regulations 1916 under the Defence Act 1903-1917. This regulation applies specifically to military officers within the Commonwealth of Australia, prohibiting them from using their military rank titles in any documents or correspondence unless it pertains directly to their military duties. The amendment extends the existing regulatory framework by introducing an additional layer of governance concerning the professional conduct of military officers, ensuring that their official capacity is clearly distinguished from their personal or civilian activities. This regulation is intended to maintain the integrity and professionalism of military service by preventing the misuse of military rank titles in non-military contexts. The application of this regulation is nationwide, reflecting the overarching authority of the Commonwealth in matters of defence and military governance. There are no stated exclusions or exemptions within the text, implying that it applies broadly to all military officers without specific exceptions.

Key Provisions

The primary operative section of this statutory regulation, Regulation 480a, mandates that no officer shall use their military rank title when signing any document or correspondence outside of those related to their military duties (Regulation 480a). This regulation specifically targets the use of military titles in a civilian context, aiming to maintain a clear distinction between military and civilian capacities. This section applies to all officers within the Australian Defence Force, ensuring that their actions outside of their military responsibilities are not influenced by their military rank. The regulation imposes a clear obligation on all officers to refrain from using their military rank titles in civilian documents or correspondence. This requirement ensures that officers do not leverage their military status to exert undue influence or authority in non-military settings. This boundary is intended to preserve the integrity and impartiality of civilian interactions, preventing any potential conflicts of interest or misuse of military rank in personal or professional dealings outside of military duties. Breaches of Regulation 480a may result in disciplinary action under military law, as the misuse of a military rank title in civilian contexts is considered a violation of the regulation. The specific consequences for such breaches are not detailed in the regulation itself, but they would typically involve administrative or judicial processes within the Defence Force. The intent of the regulation is to uphold the standards of conduct expected from officers in their civilian capacities, and violations may lead to consequences that could affect their standing and career within the Defence Force.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Administrative Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Offence Provisions
Administrative Discretion

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.