STATUTORY RULES.
1917. No. 226.
REGULATION UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1915.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulation, under the Defence Act 1903-1915, to come into operation forthwith.
Dated this thirteenth day of September, 1917.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
G. F. PEARCE,
Minister of State for Defence.
Regulation 787 of the Australian Military Regulations 1916 dated 28th July, 1916 (Statutory Rules 1916 No. 166), is repealed and the following new Regulation made in lieu thereof:—
787. The following shall be the prescribed authorities and persons who may grant or withdraw exemptions from training referred to in Section 138 of the Defence Act:—
(a) Under sub-section 1, paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), and sub-section (3)—
Area Officers.
(b) Under sub-section 1, paragraph (f) in the case of persons residing in exempt areas who registered previous to the amendment of sub-paragraph one of Section 142 of the Act or have moved into exempt areas subsequent to their registration while resident within a distance of five miles from the nearest place appointed for training—
The District Commandant or an officer appointed by him.
(c) Under the proviso of paragraph (f) of sub-section (1)—
District Commandants.
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.11258.—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1917 No. 226, issued under the Defence Act 1903-1915, were enacted to address the need for a more defined authority structure for granting or withdrawing exemptions from military training, as previously outlined in Regulation 787 of the Australian Military Regulations 1916. This legislative instrument, made by the Governor-General in Council, came into immediate effect and outlines the specific authorities and persons who are empowered to grant or withdraw such exemptions. The policy objective, as implicit in the regulation, is to ensure a clear and structured process for managing exemptions from military training, thereby maintaining the operational readiness of the military while accommodating certain exceptions.
The regulation specifies that Area Officers are the primary authorities for granting or withdrawing exemptions under most conditions, while District Commandants or their appointed officers handle cases involving persons residing in exempt areas who registered prior to amendments or moved into such areas within a specific distance from the nearest training location. This regulatory framework was established to streamline the process and ensure consistency in the administration of training exemptions.
Scope and Application
This Statutory Rule, No. 226, made under the Defence Act 1903-1915, specifies the authorities and individuals authorised to grant or withdraw exemptions from military training. The Act applies to the Commonwealth of Australia, and its provisions are enforced through the Australian Military Regulations 1916. The specified authorities and persons who may grant or withdraw exemptions from training are defined according to various subsections and paragraphs within Section 138 of the Defence Act. Area Officers are authorised to grant or withdraw exemptions under sub-section 1, paragraphs (a) to (f), and sub-section (3). For individuals residing in exempt areas who registered prior to a specific amendment or moved into such areas while living within five miles of the nearest training location, the District Commandant or an officer appointed by him has the authority. Additionally, District Commandants have the authority under the proviso of paragraph (f) of sub-section (1). This regulation is effective immediately and replaces Regulation 787 of the Australian Military Regulations 1916.
Key Provisions
The primary operative sections of the Statutory Rules 1917 No. 226, which is a regulation under the Defence Act 1903-1915, pertain to the authorities and persons who may grant or withdraw exemptions from military training as outlined in Section 138 of the Defence Act. Regulation 787 specifically identifies these authorities and persons. For instance, under sub-section 1, paragraphs (a) through (f), and sub-section (3) of Section 138, the authority to grant or withdraw exemptions rests with Area Officers (Section 787(a)). In cases involving persons residing in exempt areas who registered before an amendment to sub-paragraph one of Section 142, or who moved into such areas after registering while living within five miles of the nearest training location, the District Commandant or an officer appointed by him has the authority to grant or withdraw exemptions (Section 787(b)). Furthermore, in situations governed by the proviso of paragraph (f) of sub-section (1), District Commandants are designated as the authorities for these actions (Section 787(c)).
These regulations impose clear obligations and requirements on the identified authorities and persons. Area Officers and District Commandants, as specified, must adhere to the stipulations of Section 138 of the Defence Act when considering applications for exemptions from military training. This involves a thorough evaluation process to ensure that all applications are assessed fairly and in accordance with the legislative framework. Additionally, if an exemption has already been granted, these authorities are required to review and potentially revoke the exemption if circumstances change or if it is found that the exemption was granted erroneously.
Failure to comply with the provisions of these regulations can lead to various consequences. While the specific offences and penalties are not detailed in the text provided, it is reasonable to infer that non-compliance with the Defence Act or its regulations could result in civil or criminal penalties, as is often the case with statutory regulations. The exact penalties could include fines, imprisonment, or other sanctions as prescribed by relevant laws. The seriousness of the offence and the degree of non-compliance would typically determine the specific penalties imposed.