STATUTORY RULES.
1917. No. 279.
––––––––
REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1917.
I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1917 to come into operation forthwith.
Dated the twenty-fourth day of October, 1917.
R. M. FERGUSON,
Governor-General.
By His Excellency’s Command,
G. F. PEARCE,
Minister of State for Defence.
––––––––
Australian Military Regulations, Amendment.
A.559/1/9.
The Australian Military Regulations 1916 are amended as follows:—
Insert after Regulation 35 the following new Regulations, to take effect as from 1st August, 1914:—
“35a. (1) In time of war officers of the Permanent Forces found to be medically unfit for Active Service due to wounds or sickness contracted on Active Service may, on approval by the Military Board, be retained on the strength of their unit during the period of the war, provided that they are medically fit to undertake such duties as may be allotted to them.
(2) No officer so retained will be entitled to promotion in substantive rank.”
“35b. Notwithstanding the provisions of Regulation 35, an officer of the Militia Forces who is certified to be unfit for Active Service may in time of war be promoted in temporary or honorary rank as may be recommended by the Military Board.”
A.584/2/4.
Regulation 154 is amended as follows:—
Paragraph (iv)—For “This Regulation” substitute “Paragraphs (i), (ii), and (iii) of this Regulation.”
Add the following new paragraph:—
“v. An officer found to be permanently medically unfit owing to wounds or sickness not due to misconduct contracted on Active Service subsequent to 1st August, 1914, who has not the requisite service under paragraph (i) above, may, on the recommendation of the Military Board, be allowed to retain his rank on retirement, with the right to wear the uniform of his corps with the addition of the letter R on the shoulder strap.”
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––
Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.
C.13672—Price 3d.
Overview
The Statutory Rules 1917 No. 279, titled "Regulations Under the Defence Act 1903-1917," was enacted to address issues arising during wartime concerning the medical fitness and rank retention of officers in the Australian military. Enacted by the Governor-General in Council, these regulations amended the Australian Military Regulations 1916 to provide clarity and support for officers who were medically unfit for active service but required to remain in some capacity to support the war effort. The primary aim of these regulations, as stated in the text, was to ensure that officers who were unfit for active duty due to wounds or sickness contracted during service could still be retained and appropriately recognized within the military structure, while also clarifying their rights and entitlements concerning rank and promotion.
Scope and Application
The Australian Military Regulations, as amended by Statutory Rules 1917 No. 279, apply to officers of the Permanent Forces and the Militia Forces within the Commonwealth of Australia, particularly during times of war. These regulations concern the retention and promotion of officers who are medically unfit for active service due to wounds or sickness contracted during active service. The scope includes provisions for officers to be retained on the strength of their unit if they are medically fit for duties assigned to them, with specific limitations on their promotion in substantive rank. Additionally, officers of the Militia Forces may be promoted in temporary or honorary rank based on the recommendation of the Military Board. Furthermore, officers found permanently medically unfit, excluding cases due to misconduct, may retain their rank on retirement, with the right to wear their uniform with a specific insignia. The regulations extend their reach to officers affected by events occurring subsequent to 1st August 1914, thereby encompassing a national scope within the Commonwealth of Australia. The amendments made under this statutory instrument do not specify any exclusions, exemptions, or thresholds but rather provide a structured framework for handling the status and rights of affected officers during wartime.
Key Provisions
The main operative sections of these Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1917 pertain to the management of officers found to be medically unfit for active service during wartime. Regulation 35a(1) allows officers of the Permanent Forces, who are medically unfit due to wounds or sickness contracted on active service, to be retained on the strength of their unit during the period of the war, provided they are fit to undertake assigned duties. However, under Regulation 35a(2), these officers are not entitled to promotion in substantive rank. Regulation 35b extends this provision to officers of the Militia Forces, permitting them to be promoted in temporary or honorary rank if certified unfit for active service, based on recommendations by the Military Board.
These Regulations impose obligations on the Military Board to review and make recommendations regarding the retention and promotion of medically unfit officers. Specifically, under Regulation 35a, the Military Board must approve the retention of medically unfit officers in the Permanent Forces and determine their suitability for assigned duties. Under Regulation 35b, the Board must recommend whether an officer of the Militia Forces should be promoted in temporary or honorary rank. Furthermore, Regulation 154(v) mandates that the Military Board must recommend the retention of a rank for an officer found to be permanently medically unfit, provided they meet certain criteria, such as not having contracted their condition due to misconduct and having sufficient service.
Breach of these Regulations, while not explicitly detailed in the text, may result in various consequences. For instance, if an officer is retained without proper approval or if an unfit officer is promoted without a recommendation from the Military Board, these actions could be considered non-compliance. While the text does not specify maximum penalties, breaches of military regulations can typically lead to disciplinary actions, including discharge or other administrative penalties. Additionally, failure to adhere to the stipulated procedures for retention and promotion could result in legal ramifications, both civil and criminal, depending on the severity and intent behind the breach.