Australian Military Regulations 1916 (Amendment)

Legislation au C1920L00091 Regulations Not in force Legislative Instrument

Legislation content

STATUTORY RULES.

1920. No. 91.

_______

REGULATIONS UNDER THE DEFENCE ACT 1903-1918.

I, THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL in and over the Commonwealth of Australia, acting with the advice of the Federal Executive Council, hereby make the following Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918, to come into operation forthwith.

Dated this second day of June, 1920.

R. M. FERGUSON,

Governor-General.

By His Excellency’s Command,

G. F. PEARCE,

Minister of State for Defence.

______

Amendment of The Australia Military Regulations 1916.

The Australian Military Regulations 1916 are amended as follows:—

(1) Regulation 302.—The words “Inspection of Junior Cadet training in the schools when so ordered by the District Commandant” are amended to read—“Inspection of Junior Cadet training in schools not under the control of a State Education Department”.

(2) Regulation 358 is amended as follows:—

Paragraph (XI.) of sub-regulation (1) is repealed and the following sub-regulations are added:—

(3) A sentence of dismissal or discharge or discharge with ignominy, under section 97 of the Defence Act or under the Army Act, unless execution thereof is suspended under A.M.R. 645 (1) or section 57 (1) of the Army Act, will take effect on the day of promulgation, whether proceedings on discharge and a certificate of discharge are completed on that day or not.

(4) When a soldier is dismissed or discharged or discharged with ignominy by sentence of court martial, the usual proceedings on discharge and certificate of discharge will be prepared in such a way as to record that the dismissal, discharge or discharge with ignominy took place on the day of promulgation, or if there has been a suspension of the execution of the sentence, on the day on which the suspension ceased. When the person to whom the certificate relates is in prison the certificate will be sent to the Governor of the prison.

(3) Sub-regulation (3) of regulation 364 is repealed.

(4) Next after regulation 478 the following regulation is inserted:—

478a. Officers and soldiers should at all times guard against being placed in it position which might lay them open to suspicion of being influenced in the discharge of their military duty by other than purely public consideration.

They should be scrupulously careful, in their relations with persons supplying or intending to supply goods for military purposes or performing or intending to perform paid services for the benefit of His Majesty’s Military Forces or any party thereof, to avoid entering into any transactions which might give rise to such a suspicion.

(5) Regulation 647a is amended by inserting next after the word “remitted” the words “or quashed” and by inserting next after the word “remission” the words “or quashing if the conviction stands”.

 


(6) Regulation 653 is amended by inserting next after sub-regulation (3) the following

sub-regulation:—

3a. If after confirmation has been completed it appears that a sentence is invalid and a valid sentence cannot be substituted under the powers conferred by these Regulations or by the Rules of Procedure made under the Army Act the sentence shall be quashed.

(7) Regulation 656 is amended as follows:—

The figure “(1)” is inserted next after the figures “656”. The words “except as mentioned in sub-regulation (2) of this regulation” are inserted next after the word “however”.

The following sub-regulations are added:—

(2) If at the time of signing the minute of confirmation or at any time thereafter, the authority who confirms or any authority for the time being qualified to confirm, signs on the proceedings a minute in or to the effect of the form contained in this sub-regulation, publication of the charge finding sentence and confirmation and recommendation to mercy, if any, as directed by the minute last aforesaid shall be sufficient promulgation.

form.

It appears to me to be impracticable to communicate with the accused personally owing to (here state cause of impracticability), and I direct that the charge (s) finding sentence and confirmation (add, if any, “and recommendation to mercy”) be published (here state the orders or other medium of publication selected).

Signature—

Date—

(3) Notwithstanding promulgation in accordance with sub-regulation (2) of this regulation, the charge, finding, sentence and confirmation and recommendation to mercy, if any, shall be communicated to the accused personally as soon as practicable but omission of such communication shall not invalidate the promulgation.

(8) Next after regulation 657a the following regulation is inserted:—

657b. (1) A sentence of cashiering or dismissal of an officer under the Army Act or the Defence Act, unless execution of the sentence, is suspended under section 57 (1) of the Army Act or A. M. R. 645 (1), will take effect on the day of promulgation.

(2) A sentence of cashiering or dismissal of an officer will be notified in the Gazette as having, taken effect on the day of promulgation, or if there has been a suspension of the execution of the sentence, on the day on, which the suspension ceased.

(Regulation 785—

(9) The figure “(1)” is inserted next after the figures “785” and the following sub-regulation

  is added:

(2) The Area Officer may, for the purpose of ascertaining whether any person who has received a certificate of exemption under the last preceding sub-regulation is fit for service, order that person to attend at such time and place as the Area Officer specifics, and to submit himself to a further examination by a prescribed medical authority.

 

 

________________

Printed and Published for the Government of the Commonwealth of Australia by Albert J. Mullett, Government Printer for the State of Victoria.

 

Overview

The Statutory Rules 1920 No. 91, titled "Regulations under the Defence Act 1903-1918," were enacted to amend the Australian Military Regulations of 1916. These regulations were introduced to address specific issues within the military justice system, ensuring the swift and clear execution of sentences handed down by courts martial. The enactment was carried out by the Governor-General in Council, under the authority granted by the Defence Act 1903-1918. The overarching policy objective of these regulations is to maintain the efficiency and fairness of military disciplinary procedures, ensuring sentences are executed promptly and effectively, while also providing mechanisms for the review and potential quashing of invalid sentences.

Scope and Application

The Statutory Rules 1920 No. 91, made under the Defence Act 1903-1918, amend the Australian Military Regulations 1916 to revise various provisions concerning military discipline and procedure. These regulations apply to military personnel, including officers and soldiers, within the Australian Defence Force and are enforced throughout the Commonwealth of Australia. They establish new rules regarding the inspection of cadet training, the timing of the execution of disciplinary sentences, and the conduct of officers and soldiers in relation to commercial dealings. Furthermore, these regulations allow for the quashing of invalid sentences and provide mechanisms for promulgating disciplinary actions, including the publication of charges and sentences in cases where personal communication with the accused is not feasible. The amendments clarify and refine the existing framework for military discipline, ensuring that disciplinary processes are conducted efficiently and effectively.

Key Provisions

The main operative sections of the Statutory Rules 1920 No. 91 involve several significant amendments to the Australian Military Regulations 1916. Firstly, Regulation 302 has been amended to specify the inspection of Junior Cadet training in schools not under the control of a State Education Department. Secondly, Regulation 358 has been altered to ensure that sentences of dismissal or discharge take effect on the day of promulgation, regardless of whether the proceedings have been completed. Thirdly, the insertion of Regulation 478a highlights the need for officers and soldiers to avoid any transactions that might lead to suspicion of being influenced by non-public considerations. Additionally, Regulation 647a now allows for the quashing of convictions under certain circumstances, and Regulation 653 introduces a sub-regulation to quash sentences that are found to be invalid. Furthermore, Regulation 656 allows for alternative means of promulgating sentences if personal communication with the accused is impractical, and Regulation 657b mandates the notification of cashiering or dismissal of an officer in the Gazette. Lastly, Regulation 785 has been amended to give the Area Officer the authority to re-examine individuals who have received a certificate of exemption to determine their fitness for service. These regulations impose several obligations on military personnel and authorities. They require meticulous adherence to procedures for the execution and communication of sentences, ensuring that all legal requirements are met. Officers and soldiers must exercise caution in their dealings with suppliers and service providers to avoid any potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, authorities must follow specific protocols for the promulgation of sentences and the notification of dismissals or cashierings, ensuring transparency and legal compliance. Medical examinations and evaluations are also mandated to ascertain the fitness of individuals for service. Breach of these regulations can lead to various civil and criminal consequences. Invalid sentences may result in their quashing, which can have significant implications for the individuals involved. Failure to communicate sentences or dismissals as required can also result in legal challenges and administrative issues. Non-compliance with the stipulations regarding conflicts of interest may lead to disciplinary actions against officers and soldiers. Furthermore, the regulations provide a framework for handling cases where personal communication with the accused is impractical, ensuring that due process is maintained even under challenging circumstances.

Legal classification tags

Area of Law
Defence & Military Law
Instrument
Regulation
Concepts
Definitions & Interpretation
Repeal & Amendment
Offence Provisions
Enforcement Powers
Reporting & Disclosure Obligations

Interactions

Authorises

All Versions

Sourced from the Federal Register of Legislation at 26 August 2026. For the latest information on Australian Government law please go to https://www.legislation.gov.au.